How to avoid (successful) accusations of defamation on Twitter. A few thoughts from someone who is NOT a libel lawyer, but does say very critical things about named individuals. 1/
2. When I tweet I aim to be sure A. I show the *facts* I am basing my *opinion* on. B. I have good reason to believe the *facts* are true. C. My opinion is reasonable based on the facts.
Here I am calling Arron Banks a racist (opinion). Pointing out this is because he called for mosques to be demolished (fact). 4/
I can prove this fact - and others - about what Banks has said. And I can justify why in my opinion that shows he’s a racist. 5/
It may be different if I called [person] a racist without indicating why - because that may imply to readers I know [damaging facts] that I can’t prove. 6/
3. When you tweet your facts with your opinion, you help show what you mean by your words. So “corruption” has different meanings - here I’m showing one 7/
4. If someone alleges defamation, take it seriously. Think “can I prove the fact I stated / based my opinion on? Is my opinion reasonable?” 8/
5. If you’re in doubt, ask someone you trust to read what you’ve said. And to ask you those same questions - “can you prove the facts? Is your opinion reasonable?” 9/
6. Just because someone says “that’s libel” doesn’t mean it is. Yaxley-Lennon *is* a racist. He hasn’t sued me yet. 10/
7. If you think your tweet was wrong, or you don’t think you can show the facts, I’d delete it. You can always tweet it again if you become sure enough. 11/
8. If someone tells you they think you libelled *them* (not someone else), don’t ignore them. Think about how to respond, and respond. 12/
9. A person who may have been libelled is expected by the court to try to settle the dispute without proceedings. justice.gov.uk/courts/procedu…
10. If someone tweets/DMs that you’ve libelled them but it’s not clear how, you can ask them what it is that you’ve said they disagree with - especially *factually*.
Because you may have it wrong, or they may have misunderstood you. 14/
11. Think before you *re-tweet* and *reply* to a tweet that may be libellous. Treat RTing and agreeing replies as if the tweet was in your name. 15/
Libel law is important protection.
How our friends, colleagues, the world sees us matters to many people. The law isn’t going away.
16/16
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some Leavers believe UK’s economic/political interests/qualities are fundamentally different from France & Germany. But this is so daft & so close to obvious extreme nationalism it never explained the EU’s existence for them 2/
But if UK isn’t fundamentally different from Germany & France. How to make sense of German / French EU membership? 3/
My opinion: Patel doesn’t care if immigration lawyers - or staff who work with us - get murdered. She will have been warned of the risks - she deliberately chooses to take them.
Barristers aren’t allowed - under our rules - to turn away clients because of what they’ve done. I’ve represented convicted murderers - and victims of terrible crimes.
Our job is to try & ensure law is upheld by the powerful: the courts & the state.
That’s why Patel hates us. +
My fellow lawyers & support staff - paralegals, secretaries, barristers clerks, cleaners, receptionists, IT staff, accountants, managers - we make sure justice works. For all of us.
When you protest to get arrested, *of course* you go floppy. This is 101 policing. What next - protestors should walk into the vans? theguardian.com/environment/20…
Takes me back to a protest I co-organised in Cardiff against Thatcher’s plan to close Uni College Cardiff.
We lie down in road. Police come, start arresting us & into the van.
Only problem +
... once one van of arrestees has been driven off, there aren’t enough police to keep next batch in the van *and* arrest those lying in road. The people in the van keep getting back out and lying down in the road again +
1. EU Top priority - don’t add to Johnson’s attempts to wreck Withdrawal Agreement. WA is best hope for island of Ireland, UK/EU citizens who’ve moved and much more.
2. EU Immediate - find & focus on the actual threats in the Bill & amendments to NI’s place in Single Market (not the rhetoric). Make sure Tory rebels recognise these & Johnson knows the risks of using them.
3. Use WA dispute resolution mechanisms - bring UK before CJEU for infringing WA and use dispute resolution mechanisms.
In tonight’s HoC debate, did *anyone* speak of threat from EU if UK *doesn’t back down*? Not risk of chaos in Kent, but a TRADE WAR with the world’s largest economic bloc / UK’s biggest trading partner?
Ultras going puce over confected idea of blockade in Irish Sea & EU trying to “enslave” UK.
No-one talking about EU going full-on stone-cold third country towards UK.
Maybe ultras are right - EU’s only powers are over its own members, and UK is immune from economic harm from *checks notes* a single market of 500m people.+