Tomorrow: another meeting of the Charter Commission's Government Structure Work Group, where they continue pursuit of a strong mayor system of government.
They produced a report based on conversations with unnamed former elected officials. But how am I supposed to assess their opinions if I can't know who they are? lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/File/…
Like, are these 2008-era elected officials talking about how great a job they did with their crisis compared to today's crew of feckless council members? It will remain a mystery.
This comes after last month's report summarizing conversations with department heads.
This is exactly right. Don't trade away responsiveness and transparency so you can have a strong leader who cuts out all the disagreement and divisive personalities.
None of the former elected officials like the idea of giving the mayor a line item veto, which is something the Charter Commission's work group is considering
As long as we're asking them about the mayor's catch phrases, how do they feel about policy for breakfast?
Here's an argument: give the mayor more power and it will attract better mayors.
Former elected officials giving political advice to the charter commission: if you want to diminish the power of the council to strengthen the mayor, don't give it a name that tells people that's what you're doing.
I'm still puzzling over this one. We were all focused on the mayor's direct authority over a corrupt and abusive police department. Then the charter commission decided to have a different conversation about giving the mayor that authority over all the rest of the departments.
It would have to go on the ballot to be approved by voters.
It's not a "strong mayor" charter amendment, it's about making city government work like Star Trek. In this analogy, the public works department is an alien civilization. lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/File/…
This commission decided to preserve a 60 yr old relic of police union politics (minimum MPD staffing), when most of them thought it had no place in the charter, bc that's just how it's always been. But we go 3 yrs without Council President Barb and it's time to pull the rip cord.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After much procrastination and great effort to prevent 2021 from actually beginning, I have started digging into Minneapolis candidates. Bad sign if the first result for your campaign is a crime watch facebook page? These are the times we're living in.
Michael Rainville, your first result is a parody twitter, followed by a David Brauer reply to Wedge LIVE highlighting your opposition to affordable housing. This "common sense" based campaign is getting you nowhere on the internet.
Ward 10 City Council candidate David Wheeler's google results are fine, but help me screw them up by sharing widely this fake affinity group logo: "4-Wheelers 4 Wheeler."
Remember back in November when the city council narrowly approved the mayor and the chief's request for $500,000 to bring in police officers from other agencies? It was hotly debated but nothing actually came of it. Money wasn't spent. No extra officers. minnesota.cbslocal.com/2021/01/01/mpl…
Hennepin County Sheriff Hutchinson talking about ongoing contract negotiations with Minneapolis: "the attorneys are worried about the indemnification."
They couldn't spend the money, *but if they had* I think we could point to December's violent crime stats as light at the end of the tunnel.
One way to look at this chart is that the police budget is 85% of the property tax portion of city revenues.
Council President Bender: had a "briefing from our finance staff about some of the risks facing us in 2021" indicating potential need for midyear cuts, "particularly depending on the outcome of lawsuits related to our police department which of course are not reflected here."
Council Member Schroeder asks staff a question, confirming that we don't have room in the budget for more programs.
One thing that must have escaped my notice during the implementation triplex legalization in low density zones: Minneapolis retained the varying lot size minimums in what used to be our single-family zoning districts R1 and R1A (6,000 and 5,000 square feet).
I don't know why we needed two single family zones, though I can guess, but I think it makes sense not to retain this ratcheting up of restrictions. @MoreNeighbors is asking for 3,500 square foot lot minimums across the board.
Happening now: City Council public safety committee receiving a presentation on "evidence-based strategic interventions to reduce violence and promote safe communities."
Violence is concentrated in small, intense groups, which is not changing: "That existing high risk world is becoming more active."
"Violence is not moving to new people and places."
"The pandemic has made it easier for that small number of impact players to operate... Schools are closed, clubs are closed, restaurants are closed. The high risk population is not inclined to listen to public health advice. They're in public places near where they live."
Happening now at the City Council's BIHZ Committee: Linden Hills neighbors have appealed to stop a lot split that would allow two duplexes to replace a single-family home. City Council has the power to reverse the Planning Commission's decision.
"The commission is actively permitting these unjust decisions and supports a growing sense it comes from some sort of resentment bias against the citizens of Linden Hills and southwest Minneapolis."
It's getting good.
Neighbor Katharine says guy wants to build some "luxury duplexes."
Guy says, actually "it is in the spirit of the neighborhood" because Katharine has a 3-story "luxury home." He has a picture of it. He adds, she's only been in the neighborhood since 2018.