Every HMO has a website, an app, phone lines. Israelis interact with their HMO to make appointments, get test results and manage prescriptions all in a single place.
The HMOs sent alerts to all over-60s and text messages to their phones: "you are eligible to make an appointment for a coronavirus vaccine".
For the first few days, you could only make appointments on the phone. Within two weeks, people could also use their HMO website or app, too.
At the vaccine centre, you show your appointment and walk in. By now, anyone over 60 can walk into their HMO's vaccine centres even without an appointment, too.
Vaccine centres include clinics, a sports arena, tents in town squares and even a drive-through!
In the vaccine centre, you take a number and wait to be called. You can also book an appointment for your second dose while you wait.
When your number is called, the nurse asks your ID number, your name, year of birth and if you have any allergies. That's all put in an iPad. It takes less than 30 seconds.
Then you bare your upper arm and get jabbed. In and out of the nurse's station in 2-3 minutes, depending on how long it takes to pull your sleeve down.
Vaccinated people are asked to wait 15 mins to check for adverse reactions. And that's it! You can go.
The only part that needs skilled personnel is the jab itself, and that bit takes just 3 minutes, though it could be longer for less mobile people.
The NHS is much more hodgepodge and disorganised than Israel's HMOs, so if it wants to do more paperwork, fine. But hire administrators to do it, and keep the nurses' hands free to do the vaccinating!
Some challenges Israel faced: the most elderly and vulnerable can't easily make appointments or come to vaccination centres. ariehkovler.com/2020/12/israel…
Especially with the finickity Pfizer vaccine, it took a while to scale up vaccination efforts at remote sites like care homes, but they're doing 20k offsite vaccines a day now.
Stock management also posed challenges because of the Pfizer vaccine's short shelf life. With the UK using the much more stable Oxford vaccine, they can be more flexible.
One important advantage Israel has: a very young population. High birth rates mean that a relatively small proportion of the population is over 60.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, I think we'll see Trump announce a 2024 run in the next couple of days, to keep himself relevant and in the news. But...
There's a lot of anger in the MAGA base against Trump himself. They believed him when he said the election was stolen. They believed he'd overturn the result.
The core MAGA crowd were excited to see what Trump had planned to stay in office and make "liberals' heads explode". They trusted the plan.
Trump: I hope Mike Pence does the right thing. If he does the right thing we win the election... all VP Pence has to do is send it back to the state and we [sic] become President and you're the happiest people.
Trump: I said to Mike [Pence], that doesn't take courage. What takes courage is doing nothing.
On Biden becoming President, he says "We're not going to let that happen".
Trump is now talking about how the Biden Administration will take Jefferson's name off the monument.
Basically everything in Lin Wood's thread is part of the broad QAnon conspiracy: supposed videos of abuse and murder, Kappy's suicide, secret keys, intel agencies.
(The only thing that's new to me is involving the Lizard Squad hacker group, but I'm sure that's just cos I missed it).
In England, 521,594 people had received the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine by Sunday 20 December. Of those, 367k, 70%, were over the age of 80.
There are something like 2.5 million people in England and Wales over the age of 80, so this is impressive but there's a long way still to go.
Israel vaccinated 60k people yesterday, up to 1.4% of the total population, but is offering the vaccine to all under-60s, which leaves some of the oldest, most vulnerable people fighting for appointment slots.
I mean, did the EU really want to limit the UK's access to Europol and Eurojust? Or were these just negotiating positions to give away so the UK could 'win' something?
Is this one really a "UK win" and not just a sensible compromise between two positions that were both flexible and close to begin with?