The Pandemic has got me thinking. On TV, people of the future are always very comfortable with data. They collect it. They analyze it. They adjust their strategies in real time. Not in days or hours or minutes but often literally in SECONDS.🧵👇
They run simulations of different outcomes. The simulations aren't always right but they seem to put them in the ballpark of what's reasonable. People take the simulations and data seriously. They factor them into their planning.
Even when the future government is evil, it's still smart. Even when the future government is rigid and uncreative in how it responds to stuff, it's responses are still logically related to the assumptions it has made, the data it has collected and the analyses it has performed.
Unfortunately, our civilization is NOT THAT. We collect data but usually haphazardly and in ways that make it hard to draw any conclusions. It often takes a long time for us to make sense of data. Politicians often throw out the numbers completely.
We don't seem to care what the probability of various outcomes are. We don't seem to use probabilities when making decisions. Perhaps, you're thinking about the election predictions and about how they were close but not quite right.
On TV, future people know the probabilities are just ESTIMATES. They know that the computer is just doing a straightforward extrapolation from the data. They don't hold it against the computer that it can't see the curveballs.
We are approximately a year into the pandemic and I can't say "ALEXA, what is my probability of being infected today?" She has no estimates.
Just before I enter a bad spot, wouldn't it be great if Alexa could chime in and say "WARNING KAREEM. I estimate a 96% chance of infection if you enter this building."
Personally, I walk around taking MAXIMUM precautions at all time and that hypervigilance has been costing me psychologically. So, it would be nice to have a little computer buddy looking out for me and letting me know when I have to be extra careful.
Why don't I know immediately how many people around me are infected? Anonymized of course. It could just be a single number indicating threat level. It doesn't have to say who it is.
Shouldn't the US government have a state by state, county by county simulation of the spread of the disease? Shouldn't we all be able to access it?
Forget hover boards, trips to mars and self-driving cars. This doesn't require new discoveries, it's just numbers and code. It's weird because even though WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY, WE DON'T SEEM TO HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. Why is that?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🔥Kareem Carr🔥

🔥Kareem Carr🔥 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kareem_carr

6 Jan
Here are my TWO simple rules for deciding who's an expert (both during a pandemic and in general)! 🧵👇
I don't think we should automatically believe people who say they're experts but we also shouldn't automatically dismiss them either.
I have 2 simple criteria for identifying experts:

1. Am I confident that this person has spent a lot of time formally thinking and reading about the topic?

2. Am I confident this person has spent lots of time gathering direct real world experience about the topic?
Read 7 tweets
3 Jan
When academic experts like me try to share our knowledge on social media, we attract our own special kinds of reply guys (and gals!).

Here's my list of academic reply guys! 👇
The Traffic Cop. This type wants you to "Stay in your lane!". You can use social media or you can know what you're talking about but you can't do both! The traffic cop understands that democratic debate works best when everybody involved is ignorant.
The Trash Panda. The trash panda is very picky and will only consume information from unofficial sources. Everything else is fake news! People with PhDs, Government officials, World recognized experts. BAD! Facebook posts, WhatsApp viral videos, Youtube comments. GOOD!
Read 17 tweets
2 Jan
These are the languages I'm learning for my "Kareem Can Code!" project (#kareemcancode):
Bash, C, C++, Clojure, CSS, Emacs, Fortran, Go, Haskell, Java, Javascript, Julia, LateX, Mathematica, Matlab, Programming Language Theory, Python, R, SAS, Scala, SQL, Stata, Swift, VBA, Vim
The first language is going to be Julia starting on January 4th! 😄 I picked it by randomly shuffling the languages but I think my Julia-loving followers will be very happy with this outcome.
Here's an FAQ on the project. Follow me if you think it's a fun project and want to hear about my reactions to all the different languages!
Read 9 tweets
31 Dec 20
I'm narrowing down my list of languages to try out in 2021! What do you think of list? Anything on the MAYBE/NO pile that should be a YES! Anything on the YES that should be a NO. Let me know. Make the case in the comments!

#kareemcancode
The logic of the project is I want to expand my horizons as a programmer. None of this intended to be productive in anyway other than expanding my mind to new possibilities.
I'll be tweeting about it so follow me if you want to see how the experiment turns out. Also, I'll be using the hashtag #kareemcancode
Read 7 tweets
31 Dec 20
this year
• i survived
• gained 30k followers
• did not relapse into depression
• appeared in the new york times
• and popular mechanics
• and garnered no less than 5 unfavorable mentions in the right wing media
• exercised regularly
• had two positive interactions with a dean of Harvard (a dramatic increase from zero all previous years)
• successfully championed the idea of a family group chat!
Read 6 tweets
6 Dec 20
People keep pinging me about "irregularities" in the election. I guess they figure I'm a straight shooter which is flattering. OK. You want my raw opinion. Let’s go. You might want to sit down for this one.
The design of the US electoral system is IDIOTIC. So...WEIRD, CONTRADICTORY results are just expected behavior.
If the United States of America wanted a reasonable electoral system with reasonable outcomes, they wouldn't have FIFTY DIFFERENT STATES with FIFTY DIFFERENT SYSTEMS.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!