The Pandemic has got me thinking. On TV, people of the future are always very comfortable with data. They collect it. They analyze it. They adjust their strategies in real time. Not in days or hours or minutes but often literally in SECONDS.🧵👇
They run simulations of different outcomes. The simulations aren't always right but they seem to put them in the ballpark of what's reasonable. People take the simulations and data seriously. They factor them into their planning.
Even when the future government is evil, it's still smart. Even when the future government is rigid and uncreative in how it responds to stuff, it's responses are still logically related to the assumptions it has made, the data it has collected and the analyses it has performed.
Unfortunately, our civilization is NOT THAT. We collect data but usually haphazardly and in ways that make it hard to draw any conclusions. It often takes a long time for us to make sense of data. Politicians often throw out the numbers completely.
We don't seem to care what the probability of various outcomes are. We don't seem to use probabilities when making decisions. Perhaps, you're thinking about the election predictions and about how they were close but not quite right.
On TV, future people know the probabilities are just ESTIMATES. They know that the computer is just doing a straightforward extrapolation from the data. They don't hold it against the computer that it can't see the curveballs.
We are approximately a year into the pandemic and I can't say "ALEXA, what is my probability of being infected today?" She has no estimates.
Just before I enter a bad spot, wouldn't it be great if Alexa could chime in and say "WARNING KAREEM. I estimate a 96% chance of infection if you enter this building."
Personally, I walk around taking MAXIMUM precautions at all time and that hypervigilance has been costing me psychologically. So, it would be nice to have a little computer buddy looking out for me and letting me know when I have to be extra careful.
Why don't I know immediately how many people around me are infected? Anonymized of course. It could just be a single number indicating threat level. It doesn't have to say who it is.
Shouldn't the US government have a state by state, county by county simulation of the spread of the disease? Shouldn't we all be able to access it?
Forget hover boards, trips to mars and self-driving cars. This doesn't require new discoveries, it's just numbers and code. It's weird because even though WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY, WE DON'T SEEM TO HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. Why is that?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When academic experts like me try to share our knowledge on social media, we attract our own special kinds of reply guys (and gals!).
Here's my list of academic reply guys! 👇
The Traffic Cop. This type wants you to "Stay in your lane!". You can use social media or you can know what you're talking about but you can't do both! The traffic cop understands that democratic debate works best when everybody involved is ignorant.
The Trash Panda. The trash panda is very picky and will only consume information from unofficial sources. Everything else is fake news! People with PhDs, Government officials, World recognized experts. BAD! Facebook posts, WhatsApp viral videos, Youtube comments. GOOD!
These are the languages I'm learning for my "Kareem Can Code!" project (#kareemcancode):
Bash, C, C++, Clojure, CSS, Emacs, Fortran, Go, Haskell, Java, Javascript, Julia, LateX, Mathematica, Matlab, Programming Language Theory, Python, R, SAS, Scala, SQL, Stata, Swift, VBA, Vim
The first language is going to be Julia starting on January 4th! 😄 I picked it by randomly shuffling the languages but I think my Julia-loving followers will be very happy with this outcome.
Here's an FAQ on the project. Follow me if you think it's a fun project and want to hear about my reactions to all the different languages!
I'm narrowing down my list of languages to try out in 2021! What do you think of list? Anything on the MAYBE/NO pile that should be a YES! Anything on the YES that should be a NO. Let me know. Make the case in the comments!
The logic of the project is I want to expand my horizons as a programmer. None of this intended to be productive in anyway other than expanding my mind to new possibilities.
I'll be tweeting about it so follow me if you want to see how the experiment turns out. Also, I'll be using the hashtag #kareemcancode
this year
• i survived
• gained 30k followers
• did not relapse into depression
• appeared in the new york times
• and popular mechanics
• and garnered no less than 5 unfavorable mentions in the right wing media
• exercised regularly
• had two positive interactions with a dean of Harvard (a dramatic increase from zero all previous years)
• successfully championed the idea of a family group chat!
People keep pinging me about "irregularities" in the election. I guess they figure I'm a straight shooter which is flattering. OK. You want my raw opinion. Let’s go. You might want to sit down for this one.
The design of the US electoral system is IDIOTIC. So...WEIRD, CONTRADICTORY results are just expected behavior.
If the United States of America wanted a reasonable electoral system with reasonable outcomes, they wouldn't have FIFTY DIFFERENT STATES with FIFTY DIFFERENT SYSTEMS.