Children's outdoor sports gatherings removed as a reasonable excuse - we knew that from the guidance Image
Parents and child groups no longer permitted Image
What is important really is how similar this is to Tier 4:
- No open air recreation
- No parents and child groups
- More limited informal childcare options (I think)
- No children's sport or other outdoor sport such as tennis)
But otherwise its very similar
Elite sport and sport for people with disabilities is still permitted Image
Also well trailed in the announcements is the closure of outdoor sports facilities such as swimming, gyms, sports grounds Image
No alcohol takeaway Image
Have to pop off to eat, back later! That's basically it though, not much else changed from Tier 4
Oh, before I go, so as not to build tension, here's what's not in the law which is in the guidance :
- Time limit on outdoor exercise;
- Geographical limit on outdoor exercise
- Travel between areas.
I was indeed partly wrong on informal childcare, apologies
I am going to wait until there is a consolidated version of the regulations to make a new video, hopefully tomorrow afternoon. I understand that the amended version of the regulations should be up tomorrow
As is this - guidance has changed but not law re students
Linked households (bubbles) remain the same - exactly the same, people. Really important to get that
One other error sorry - it is the carer of a person with a disability who needs continuous care who doesn’t ‘count’ for gatherings not the disabled person themselves
The amendments have a sad little ending Image
Here is my unofficial and probably unreliable track changes version of the Tier 4 rules. Please don't rely on it, for illustrative purposes only! …ughtystreetchambers-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal…
I have updated my Covid-19 regulations and case law table docs.google.com/document/d/1ne…
You can find the relevant guidance read my thread on it here
Important to see that you still don't count a child under 5 or a carer for a person with a disability who needs continuous care when you are with someone from another household for exercise

Not in the guidance I think but maybe they don't want to publicise Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

5 Jan
🚨New lockdown regulations just published, in force tomorrow

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (No. 3) and (All Tiers) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2021

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/8/pd…

(Thread) Image
These are not a new set of regulations: they are amendments an old set of regulations

Which we thought were gone! But they are back

Welcome back No.3 regulations
A quick thing before we continue!

I have been analysing these laws for free for 9 months now - if you want to say thanks and have a few £ to spare please give to my @LawCentres fundraiser

They give free legal advice to people who need it most

justgiving.com/fundraising/ad…
Read 21 tweets
4 Jan
🚨 The guidance for the New England lockdown has been published gov.uk/guidance/natio…

Support bubbles, childcare bubbles, exercise, meeting with one of the person not from your household for exercise still in place from Tier 4
This has all been done with such crashing urgency that they haven’t even been able to transpose the PDF version of the guidance into the website yet, it is here:

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Looks pretty much the same as Tier 4:
- Can't leave home without a reasonable excuse
- Can take exercise with household/support+childcare bubble/1 other person (says once per day - don't expect this to be in the regulations but who knows)
Read 10 tweets
4 Jan
Very interested to hear precisely what the charge is...
I was dubious that she had broken the English law at the time but she has been charged in Scotland where she traveled to
What does “culpable and reckless conduct” mean Scottish lawyers? Something specific?
Read 4 tweets
4 Jan
For those who want to understand the Julian Assange judgment you can read it here:

judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…

Annex here:

judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…
I have read part of the judgment (I think only part?) that he succeeded on - there would be a substantial risk he would commit suicide if extradited. And this was exacerbated by the likely 'special administrative measures' and possibility of being housed in a 'superman' prison
Similar to other extradition cases to US (involving terrorism), judge was concerned by the potential for Assange being held in oppressive conditions.

In this sense, argument that he would be treated with hostility worked in his favour even if didn't amount to improper pressure
Read 10 tweets
4 Jan
Extraordinary - Assange has won on the mental health argument, would be a real risk of killing himself. So the Judge was building up to a surprise!
Could be an excellent result for him as will be difficult to overturn on appeal. Is a relatively simple point based on expert psychiatric evidence (I assume, haven't read the judgment).
Well done to my @DoughtyStreet colleagues Ed Fitzgerald QC and @suigenerisjen
Read 4 tweets
3 Jan
Whatever happens next - Tier 4+ or a new 'lockdown', it's important to understand that there is no magic to the term 'lockdown'.

It is better to see the laws we have been living under since March as different grades of legally enforced social distancing.
And whatever version of legally enforced social distancing the government goes for, ultimately it will stand or fall on:
(1) Simplicity of rules
(2) Clarity of communication
(3) Level of actual and perceived enforcement
You can have stricter rules without any change to the above.
Despite it being relatively short on lawyers in top positions the government as become very legalistic - assuming that changing rules (even if that makes them immensely more complex and unclear) will change behaviour.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!