Assange: reporters following the bail hearing remotely can now see court 1 of Westminster Magistrates’ Court. Hearing is due to start at 1000 but there are sometimes delays.
Assange has not yet been brought into the dock. He will be represented, as before, by Edward Fitzgerald QC and Mark Summers QC (remotely). Court now in session.
Assange gives his name and DOB. He sits.
Clair Dobbin, for US government, objecting to bail. She says Assange can’t be trusted to surrender. US says its intention to appeal would be frustrated if he was not remanded in custody.
Dobbin, for US, says Assange claimed to have assisted Edward Snowden’s escape from Hong Kong to Russia.
Assange: Dobbin, for US, says he has the resources to escape. As I predicted, she refers to Mexico’s asylum offer rozenberg.substack.com/p/assange-what…
She says he could simply enter the embassy of another country: no need to arrange a flight.
Assange: Dobbin says if he was wiling to spend seven years in Ecuadorean embassy he’s not likely to take his chances on the US appeal being dismissed.
High Court previously thought conditions that would prevent flight turned out to be hollow.
Sureties were of no consequences.
Assange: Dobbin refers to Judge Taylor’s sentencing remarks when he was convicted of jumping bail. “Her [the judge’s] comments demonstrate the Mr Assange regards himself as above the law.”
Assange: Dobbin says there’s no surety that would secure his attendance. He does not feel the “moral pull” of protecting them. He was appointed as a “diplomat” while in the Ecuador embassy.
Flight must be an even greater impulse than suicide.
Assange: US in the process of drafting grounds of appeal. Likely to argue that court did not apply test as set out in the Richen Turner I referred to here: rozenberg.substack.com/p/assange-what…
Dobbin: High Court did not require a test of whether it would be impossible to attempt suicide.
Assange: Dobbin says key issue is what measures are available to prevent suicide
We will argue that Baraitser erected higher threshold than required.
Baritser says she doesn’t need to hear detailed appeal arguments at a bail hearing.
Assange: despite what the district judge has just told her, Dobbin pushes ahead with her grounds of appeal (his mental health is not as bad as the court had found),
Dobbin now points out that Assange has never lived with his current family.
“Unsurmountable hurdles to bail.”
Assange: In reply, Ed Fitzgerald QC relies on the presumption of bail. He tells Baraitser that her decision changes everything. He’s been detailed for 15 months after serving his sentence for jumping bail. That was on the basis of an extradition request that has now been denied.
Assange: Fitzgerald says there’s now some doubt about whether the US will continue with its appeal. He relies on this report in @theguardian: theguardian.com/law/2021/jan/0…
Sorry, should have referred to @guardian. Fitzgerald says risk of flight should be consigned to history. As predicted, rozenberg.substack.com/p/assange-what… he says Assange has every reason to stay in England and abide by bail conditions. New family would now anchor him to the community.
Assange: disagreement on the evidence over risk of getting Covid at Belmarsh prison. Gareth Peirce, solicitor, has provided Fitzgerald with figures that are contrary to the evidence from the police. Dobbin shows Fitzgerald email from HMP Belmarsh last night. She reads it out.
Assange: Dobbin says Belmarsh has three prisoners on the Covid spur (as of last night). District Judge says she prefers the most up-to-date information.
Fitzgerald says that on any view Covid is worse now and Assange would be safer isolating with his family in the community.
Assange: Fitzgerald tells Baraitser she applied the correct principles as set out in recent cases (including Lauri Love: bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/…).
There’s no reason for Assange to abscond now he’s seeking to uphold Baraitser’s ruling (if an appeal goes ahead).
Assange: Fitzgerald says that Tracy Somerset, Duchess of Beaufort (“Tracy Worcester”) would stand bail for £10,000. Dobbin had said her surety had been forfeited last time. Fitzgerald says Assange would be under effective house arrest with partner and children in London.
Assange: Fitzgerald says Mexican offer was intended to take effect after the legal proceedings. Mexico did not offer him access to his embassy.
District judge: how would that help?
Fitzgerald: this would protect Assange against another US extradition request if he left the UK.
Assange: court adjourned for 10 minutes so that Fitzgerald can take instructions from Gareth Peirce, Assange’s solicitor, and reply to objections raised by Clair Dobbin for US.
Assange: court resumes. Fitzgerald says experience of 7 years in Ecuador embassy not something he’d ever repeat. Mexican president had been significantly misquoted.
Assange: Fitzgerald provides info from HMP Belmarsh saying that social visits have been suspended (and are likely to remain so). Another prisoner awaiting deportation committed suicide there recently.
District Judge Baraitser delivers her ruling on bail. She begins with the background history.
DJ Baraitser: the outcome of this appeal is not yet known. Assange still has an incentive to abscond. US must be allowed to challenge my decision. He has shown willingness to flout orders of this court.
DJ Baraitser: I am satisfied he would fail to surrender. Remanded in custody.
Assange refused bail. Hearing concluded.
Thanks for following my tweets on Assange. I’ve now updated my backgrounder:
Assange: waiting online with other journalists for a ruling from District Judge Vanessa Baraitser. Although the hearing is taking place at the Old Bailey, this is a sitting of Westminster Magistrates’ Court. It is not a trial. The losing side may appeal against the DJ’s ruling.
Reporters covering the Assange hearing remotely can now see and hear the courtroom. Edward Fitzgerald QC is asking for a glass of water. The dock is currently empty.
Assange: court is waiting for him to be brought into the dock. Ed Fitzgerald QC, his counsel, is still desperate for a glass of water.
I hope to live-tweet some of the lockdown regulations challenge hearing that starts at 1030. Claimants include Simon Dolan, a businessman. Defendants include Matt Hancock, health secretary. Claimant’s counsel is Philip Havers QC. Defendant’s counsel is Sir James Eadie QC.
Claimants apply for permission to judicially review the lawfulness of the coronavirus regulations and guidance that have caused the closure of schools for the vast
majority of children in England and which continue to deprive the great majority of children of
an education.
Sir James Eadie QC for the health secretary will argue that permission should be refused.
I am hoping to live-tweet the procedural hearing today in Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers. It’s not being streamed onto a public website but the High Court cause list indicates how people can access the remote hearing. I’m currently waiting to be let in.
It’s a privacy claim and is being heard in the Chancery Division Intellectual Property List by Mr Justice Warby. He is expected to reserve judgment until a later date. There are no witnesses at this stage.
The duchess complains about publication in the Mail on Sunday on 10 February 2019 of extracts from a letter she sent her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018. She seeks damages for misuse of her private information, breach of her data protection rights and breach of copyright.
The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales has told all judges that they will be using technology to conduct business which even a month ago would have been unthinkable. Final hearings and hearings with contested evidence very shortly will be conducted using technology (THREAD)
Otherwise, says Lord Burnett of Maldon, “there will be no hearings and access to justice will become a mirage. “Even now we have to be thinking about the inevitable backlogs and delays … that will build to an intolerable level if too much court business is simply adjourned.”
Lord Burnett urges all judges in England and Wales before agreeing to adjourn any hearing to use available time to explore with the parties the possibility for compromise.
Good morning from the @UKSupremeCourt. Lady Hale is expected to deliver a summary of the court’s judgment in the Miller/Cherry prorogation appeals at 1030. This will be live-streamed and televised. I’m in the court media room and plan to live-tweet (threaded) what’s said in court
The oral summary of the judgment normally lasts for only a few minutes. Written copies of the full judgment will then be posted online. There are no advance copies for the media (or, we are told, the parties) so the first anyone knows the result will be when Lady Hale gives it.
If the court is divided then a simple majority will decide the case. In that event, I would expect Lady Hale to tell us which of the judges are in the majority and which are in the minority. There can be no further appeal.
It will be interesting to see whether the justices ask Sir James Eadie QC the questions they put to Lord Keen QC yesterday about how the PM would respond to a declaration that his advice to HM was unlawful. Might he seek to recall parliament and prorogue once again?
It’s also worth remembering that Sir James Eadie’s arguments were successful at the High Court in London a couple of weeks ago. Three senior judges held that the claim brought by Lord Pannick QC on behalf of Gina Miller was ‘not justiciable in Her Majesty’s courts”.
Sir James Eadie QC has been First Treasury Counsel (“Treasury Devil”) for 10+ years. He’s an independent barrister in private practice (at @BlackstoneChbrs like Lord Pannick) but is briefed only by the government of the day and argues the most important cases on its behalf.