Seeing conservatives do the "yeah but what about the summer riots??" thing. Difference is this: What happened yesterday was infused with Christian symbols and encouraged (openly or tacitly, doesn't matter) by major Christian leaders who have wholly immanentized their religion.
I'm not surprised when unbelievers make power a religion and strip culture of any transcendent check on that power. But Christians know better, or at least they're supposed to. Jesus doesn't need the Senate or the White House. Why are my people acting as if this is all there is?
There's no doubt many of the leading elements of the Trumpian cult are neo-pagans and not Christian at all. But there are too many Christians involved for this not to be an indictment of us all. And that's not self-flagellation, it's fear for the Republic.
We're supposed to be a check on this madness, to see the bigger picture. I think every pastor should immediately cancel his sermon plans to teach a correct view of history, eschatology, and faith/politics to his congregation.
The sheep have no shepherd. I blame the shepherds.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lots of chatter about evangelicals these days, mostly portraying them as mischievous imps whose White Nationalist Politics are to blame for all our problems. Somehow they're the one group we're still allowed to hate.
But evangelicals aren't what most people think.
(thread)
About 8/10 white evangelicals voted for Trump, but white evangelicals are only 15% of US population. Cf. 64% white Catholics, 57% white Mainline Protestants, 46% non-white Protestants, 24% Unaffiliateds & 20% non-white Catholics who also voted for Trump.
It took a village guys.
And what the heck is evangelicalism anyway? A guy named Bebbington devised a four-part definition that everyone uses, but all definitions come up short. Evangelicalism is one of the most kinetic and amorphous social phenomena on the planet. It's not monolithic by design.
Watching today's angsty reactions to the Soleimani hit reminded me once again why Americans keep failing in the Middle East.
Let me explain.
(thread)
1. One common response I see: "Soleimani was bad but taking him out requires a comprehensive strategy. Cycles of violence will solve nothing. We need a path to peace. We must address the causes of terrorism. We need a plan to win this war and achieve a state of lasting justice."
2. To think the US can come up with (and impose) a comprehensive strategy to stop a multifaceted regional war is the height of ignorance and hubris. The Middle East will be plagued by conflict for the foreseeable future regardless of our well-laid plans. That's for starters.
I don't feel that the announcement was particularly urgent, but I disagree with those who say it was particularly wrong. It wasn't. In some ways it was remarkably unremarkable. No one in the world should be surprised
As a Christian I see the Jewish claim to Jerusalem as capital as historically valid. Yes we Christians and Muslims care about the city and care deeply, but it's pretty clear the Jews were there first. But the question is not historic claim, it's political prudence