It's becoming fashionable for some Online Communists to speak derisively of how other Online Communists do too much theory, not enough organizing.

I think the opposite is the case. People don't even agree on what to think of China!

Assata's writing on the subject is insightful: Image
First of all, this is Twitter.

You should be doing one of two things: sharing interesting theory, or telling people *precisely* what exciting initiative they should get involved with.

The much more common and vague "organize!" is reminiscent of liberals yelling "learn to code!"
There's a *lot* of mass energy already out there.

An incomplete list:

- OWS
- Ferguson
- Standing Rock
- 2012 QC Strikes
- Wet'suwet'en solidarity
- 2020 BLM uprisings
- Bernie rallies
- Pussy hats
- CHAZ
- NC teacher strikes
- "storming" ICE camps
- airport Trump blockades
Some of these are liberal, some are radical.

Some had mild success, some ended up in death, tears, frustration, wasted energy, and jadedness.

If something is lacking, it's a coherent, amply discussed, widely shared *theory* that systematically learns from each of these events.
I think this theory more or less already exists, and it's often called Marxism-Leninism.

I think, in spite of it basically existing as a spectre in North America, it very much haunts its ideological competitors in what is sometimes called the "far left."

Content vs. branding: ImageImage
My personal advice is this: You won't be able to tell if your local organization is *right* for you if you don't know what you believe or desire.

For me, given I was already Very Online, it's much easier to begin by reading than by affiliating, and I know I'm not alone in this.
I realized I wanted to work with people who were first and foremost internationalists.

That rejected CIA propaganda, that were vigilant against sinophobia, that were aware of "gusanos."

That's me. You'll have other priorities, but I suggest identifying them before affiliating.
And honestly, even *after* affiliating, I think the best thing I've done is start a reading club with some friends.

We get together once a week and read essays. Some of us are entry level in orgs, others are just curious, but that's not nothing in times of physical isolation.
My point here is that even the radical fringes of our society worship entrepreneurship, and I disagree that people outside academia err on "too much theory, not enough action."

When questions like "What's up with China?" are closed, we'll speak of too much theory. Not before.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roderic Day

Roderic Day Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RodericDay

26 Jan
toads from the AP and The Economist are furious that China has a large Uyghur population from which to draw positive testimony to counter their latest wave of atrocity propaganda

"how *dare* China present happy Uyghurs to oppose our angry, CIA-funded, regime-change Uyghurs!? 🤬" ImageImageImageImage
This Gady Epstein guy is particularly amusing ImageImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
19 Jan
Some random thoughts about the psychology of ETIM exiles, Venezuelan/Cuban "expats," QAnon folk, HK rioters, Ukrainian Nazis in Canada, etc.

@moghilemear13's latest thread debunking a @guardian "long read" about the "Uyghur Gulag" got me thinking about it.
So, the woman who was supposedly sent to the gulag previously had a job in PetroChina, in what @moghilemear13 describes as an oil boomtown.

It seems like the pool of people who get radicalized isn't "the bottom of society," but the "upwardly mobile."
I was reading a (bad) essay on Mao Zedong by Zizek a while back, and this bit from him by it always stuck with me.

Zizek is literally quoting *Robert Conquest* (lol), but what made an impression was that the idea of the "subkulak" was so easily dismissed:
lacan.com/zizmaozedong.h… Image
Read 14 tweets
7 Jan
Having come to ML from liberalism, I remember vividly my qualms, biases, and anxieties.

I was happy to dismiss writing authored by Stalin as ghost-written, and any praise as coerced.

Therefore his recorded interviews with European public figures were particularly eye-opening.
In 1931 he was interviewed by Swiss-German Emil Ludwig. Some brilliant excerpts:
redsails.org/stalin-and-lud… ImageImageImageImage
In 1934 he was interviewed by the extremely famous "Shakespeare of science fiction," H. G. Wells. The questions Wells posed Stalin may as well have been posed by anxious, liberal me.
redsails.org/stalin-and-wel… ImageImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
17 Dec 20
This is still the best essay on "Identity Politics" that I have read (by @RedMaistre, originally on The North Star).

I am always on the lookout for a compelling response to it.

Losurdo (so, Gramsci?) seems to be at the root of all my favourite Marxism.
redsails.org/on-identitaria…
The dismissive understanding of identity as trap parrots the position of its alleged opponents and simply gives it a negative meaning:
one can’t be [X] and be anything more than that at the same time; one can’t be [X] and understand anyone who is not [X] or anything else beyond being [X], because others’ human experiences are so opaque, and yours to them.
Read 25 tweets
16 Dec 20
fun fact: this is close to a complete list of countries I use to convince people that the US props up puppet states at the same time it chokes the life of socialist ones to promote a bullshit idea that Capitalism > Socialism

you missed Israel and Saudi Arabia (vs Iran) though.
goes something like,

[Puppet State] : [Adversary State]
Japan/Taiwan/HK : China
ROK : DPRK
West (Nazi) Germany : GDR
Israel/Saudi Arabia : Iran
Chile/Colombia : Cuba/Venezuela/Bolivia

it's really on the nose to admit the pattern, I wouldn't advertise it like this if I were him
One insight is obvious: If you're a "capitalist" country, but there's no "socialist" country around you, the gloves come off completely.

The US will just fucking pummel your country to death and loot every last mineral, since there's no need to "keep up appearances."
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec 20
People don't like feeling left out; like their thing is uncool or unpopular or below consideration.

So I think socialism would fare better in popular communication if people focused less on responding to and engaging with liberals, and more on intra-communist dialogue.
Nuance is a weapon, and we should notice when we are told that "socialism" should be a big indistinct blob, whereas we must adhere to an exacting taxonomy whenever we refer to liberals and conservatives and alt-right and fascists and so on.
Speaking as a newbie: whenever I saw communists dialogue in public, even in disagreement, it made communism seem vast and historical and inspired curiosity.

Whereas e.g. refusing to take sides on "China" for the sake of "unity" made it seem opportunistic and cobbled together.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!