Seth Abramson Profile picture
Jan 9, 2021 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The Alabama duo—Mo Brooks and Tommy Tuberville—is one I suspect the FBI will want to investigate. At all stages of the insurrection it seems Trump was working with two Alabama Republicans to ensure the insurrection and the opposition to Biden's certification worked hand-in-glove.
(PS) Mo Brooks was the first Republican to say he'd challenge Biden's certification; was at Trump's rally talking about "kicking ass"; was allegedly conspiring with Akbar. His Alabama GOP delegation peer, Tuberville, was Trump's Senate man, contacted by Giuliani mid-insurrection.
(PS2) A lot of people will be asking about conversations that may have occurred between/amongst Trump, Giuliani, Brooks, Biggs, Gosar, Tuberville, and Akbar as to how the insurrection would be timed and how it would dovetail with Brooks'/Tuberville's actions inside the Capitol.
(PS3) We now know both Trump and Giuliani contacted Tuberville as the insurrection was happening to get him to artificially elongate his objections to Biden's win. These exhortations would've had the effect—and appear to have been intended to—give the insurrectionists more time.
(PS4) I say "appear to have been intended to" because we now have numerous major-media reports establishing that Trump was "excited," "pleased," and "enthusiastic" as the insurrection unfolded. This was the same period of time he tried to *elongate* GOP objections to Biden's win.
(PS5) It was also during this period that Trump was rebuffing attempts to call up the Guard. So we know what Trump, his lawyer, and their allies at the Capitol were doing as the insurrection was unfolding—and we know what they weren't doing—and there seems to be a clear pattern.
(PS6) What I'm saying is that we're in the first few days of a federal investigation that may take a year or more, but one early theory of the case is that Trump didn't just incite insurrection—he and his team helped plan it many days in advance, and coordinate it as it unfolded.
(PS7) There's been such focus on Trump's January 6 words that I think there's been a lack of investigative attention to his actions on that date and before. When the Stop the Steal rally was set for January 6 on December 19, Trump knew of it and tweeted about it instantaneously.
(PS8) Why did Trump say the rally would be "wild"? How did he know before his January 6 speech that there was going to be a march on the Capitol, such that he could detail that plan of action in mid-speech? Why were he/Giuliani directing agents at the Capitol in mid-insurrection?
(PS9) Giuliani implies that him using the phrase "trial by combat" was coincidence. Brooks implies the phrase "kicking ass" was coincidence. Trump implies that him directing his people to march on the Capitol was coincidence.

Investigators will see this as too many coincidences.
(PS10) For those who missed it (it was in another thread) here's the organizer of the Stop the Steal rally saying that the march on the Capitol was a scheme coordinated with Trump allies Biggs, Gosar and Brooks—the last of whom was with Trump at the rally.
(PHOTO) For what it's worth, here's a picture of Trump with Ali Alexander (called "Akbar" earlier in this thread because he previously went by the name "Ali Akbar," but it appears he now uses "Alexander," so I will use that going forward). Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Jul 2
We all need to understand something.

Only one group has the power to decide whether President Biden will end his campaign.

Corporate media.

Voters do not get a say, nor, contrary to popular opinion, does the Biden Family.

American media wants him gone, and it will make it so.
I understand some of you doubt this. You probably haven't been watching CNN.

If you watch CNN, you'll understand that it and the rest of corporate media plans to cover this story until the Democratic Party is so terrified it forces Biden out.

All this is happening in real time.
I have been a journalist since 1994, and I don't believe I've seen corporate media collectively want something as badly as it wants Biden gone. And it knows it has the power to do it, so it's not going to stop until it's done.

I don't think anyone could withstand this onslaught.
Read 14 tweets
Jul 2
BREAKING NEWS: There's a real chance the SCOTUS ruling from yesterday also invalidated the 34 convictions Trump received in NYC, as if there was *any* introduction of evidence of official presidential acts at trial the trial and its result could be voided. nytimes.com/2024/07/02/nyr…
Yesterday I wrote that the Supreme Court ruling was far more evil than people realized.

Today I find myself writing that the ruling from yesterday is far more evil than *I* realized.

It appears we have a king now, and somehow we have this without the man even being a president.
When you treat the most vile man in American political history better than you treat anyone else on Earth, all you are doing is convincing weak-willed people to believe that that vile man must in actual fact be better than anyone else on Earth.

It is the cherry on top for Trump.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 2
UPDATE: The planes were side-by-side for two full days, in an isolated part of the airport.

The Russian plane is the one the Kremlin uses to move people and documents from the United States to the Kremlin.

There has been no explanation for this—and media has not asked about it.
I'd feel better about this "coincidence" if Trump's jet hadn't been where he secreted stolen classified docs he publicly said he has every right to sell or gift as he sees fit, and if the Kremlin weren't interfering in this election on his behalf and wanting payment for doing so.
Some of you may forget—thinking Trump stored his most valuable stolen classified docs at Mar-a-Lago—but in fact that's not true. He sifted out the most valuable stolen docs and put them on his jet as he was leaving for New Jersey. We have no idea what happened to them after that.
Read 40 tweets
Jul 1
The question is not whether the decision today allows President Biden to use SEALs to eliminate Donald Trump; it does, but he definitely should not. The question is if he can use DHS to preclude Trump from appearing on any ballots, forcing the GOP to select a different candidate.
Certainly he can find that Trump has colluded with foreign powers. And he can find that Trump incited an insurrection. Certainly it is at the outer limits of his official powers to preclude the federal government from sponsoring an election in which Trump appears on ballots.
He is not going to do any of that because he knows this Court is lawless; he knows that to take advantage of this ruling today would be anti-democratic; he knows his party would not go along; he knows it would cost him the election; he knows this SCOTUS would eventually jail him.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 1
Supreme Court decisions cut both ways; they become the law of the land for *all*.

President Biden is *entitled* now—by *law*—to determine what official acts that might previously have been deemed illegal he can take, with presidential immunity, to protect us from insurrection.
I have no idea what those acts would be. I simply know that we are in the midst of an active insurrection that is being led by Donald Trump, and that the Supreme Court has just said that all presidents, including Democrats, have far more power than was ever previously thought.
Again, I do not know where this takes us. But I know that Republicans are discussing this decision as though it will only ever apply to Donald Trump if he attempts to establish a dictatorship in the United States after a hypothetical November election victory.

They are wrong.
Read 41 tweets
Jul 1
Inciting an armed rebellion against the federal government is starting to feel pretty legal in America all of a sudden

I guess the theory the conservatives on the Court are working from is that when the next January 6 comes they *personally* will not be targeted, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
As expected, the plan of the radicals on the Court was to delay a decision for many months—until July—then erect a test for presidential immunity that will take months or years to litigate and appeal, ensuring Trump can corruptly end the case against him if he’s elected this fall
The Supreme Court has made coup attempts non-justiciable, it really is that simple

It’s becoming very hard to argue we are still a democracy
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(