I get that there are good and important libertarian arguments against the tech companies’ Trumper ban. But here’s a thread in its defense … 1/14
It’s a thread on why conservatives and liberals (as opposed to insurrectionists who would topple American democracy if they could) should favor banning speech that encouraged or cheered on Wednesday’s obscene events. 2/14
They should favor the ban because the lunatic agitator ranting on the street corner has no *right* to be given a megaphone that enables him to be heard by every potential lunatic follower of his cause in the country. 3/14
This isn’t a goddamn game. It’s not a reality show. And neither is it an Oxford debating society event. 4/14
This week the virtual world of combat many of us marinade in online burst into the real world. 5/14
If that drawbridge between virtual and actual insurrection isn’t withdrawn, we will find ourselves in a country quite literally tearing itself apart in the streets and in the halls of government around the nation. 6/14
(THE under-covered story of the week is that the insurrection on Capitol Hill was mirrored in state houses and legislatures across the country.) 7/14
Is our baseline for freedom now that every radical, anti-liberal right- and left-wing asshole must be given free access to the most powerful facilitator of political organization ever devised? 8/14
I submit that this is an insane thing to think — and that many of us think it only because we have slowly evolved into this being a new normal, … 9/14
… like the frog who thinks the nearly boiling water that’s about to kill him is just a bracing few minutes in a jacuzzi. 10/14
This is a new normal that could well bring the end of democratic self-government in the United States-- or, more likely, plunge us into civil war. 11/14
Which means that the tech company moves aren't an overreaction at all. Wednesday’s events could have been far, far worse —
… and they are likely to be far, far worse in the future if we don’t inject a little moral content into these until-now mostly neutral platforms that are being used by fascists and anarchists to tear down the institutions that keep us free — 13/14
… with freedom defined in its original, political sense: the freedom to be citizens who share in rule through institutions of self-government. 14/14
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Cancellation is: You can’t say that and I’m going to try and get you fired or considered a moral monster for daring to say it.
1/
All cultures cancel things. I suspect just about everyone thinks it’s a good thing, including most of those who signed The Letter, to cancel outright Nazis, defenders of slavery, and child molesters who would seek to advocate for their vile hobby.
2/
The question is: Should the list of things marked for cancellation be greatly expanded in this moment? Or is our culture healthier, better for its members on the whole, when relatively few things are deemed off-limits for public debate and discussion?
3/
One of a oddest recurring things about the Trump presidency is the lack of clarity about whether he's on the verge of becoming a dictator or incredibly weak. The answer is both. (Short thread) 1/
Presidents have at least two powers: making the government do stuff and shaping public opinion. On the first, Trump is quite weak and ineffective. That's very clear in the current crisis, when the federal response has been so much more minimal than what we see in the states. 2/
But on the latter -- shaping public opinion -- Trump is incredibly powerful. He does this with his words, not his deeds. Tweets like those this morning about the need to "liberate" states trying to contain a pandemic are incredibly poisoning. 3/