Changes to Government guidelines prioritised managing its reputation above the health of vulnerable children.

(With a link to the 25 page pre-action protocol letter lawyers for @GoodLawProject sent to Gavin Williamson on Thursday.) rebrand.ly/edu-0901
And here's some coverage from @tes of our challenge, the second we have been forced to bring against Government to seek to compel it properly to prioritise the education of kids in struggling families during the pandemic. tes.com/news/coronavir…
One of the issues we raised in our letter was the fact that "children will be brought into school, thus heightening the risk of infection to them and their families, purely because of their socio economic status". goodlawproject.org/news/reputatio…
And we've just read that, several days after @GoodLawProject sent its pre-action protocol letter to Government, it has already caved on one key part of our claim. theguardian.com/education/2021…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jo Maugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

11 Jan
Like you, we are concerned that private providers might be looking at pandemic food provision for the vulnerable as a chance to make supersize profits.

So in December we wrote to Government about the quality of the food boxes given in lockdown one... goodlawproject.org/news/food-parc…
... we now have a (completely inadequate) response from Government about its design and management of the £200m foodboxes contract (given without any tender process) which we are considering with Counsel. We expect to make an announcement about next steps shortly.
Legal stuff aside, it's just deplorable that so many providers seem to have thrown away their moral compass and now see pound signs where they should see basic decency and civic responsibility.
Read 5 tweets
9 Jan
Has anyone worked out if it's a good thing that private capital gets to decide whether a democratically elected politician can speak directly to the people?
(Not an attack on Facebook or Twitter; not a defence of Trump. Just a genuine question, about governance and power.)
I don't know the answer, which is why I asked. My instinct is that the question should never arise. And it only arose here because the other governance and legal checks, checks within the power of the State, failed first.
Read 6 tweets
7 Jan
Before we get too superior, our Prime Minister (chosen by fewer than 160,000 members of the Conservative Party) suspended the elected legislature when it became inconvenient to him.
He was stopped by our constitution but his Government is - at this very moment - considering whether to change our constitution so he can't be stopped should he want to do it again.
Our media - including in particular, the BBC - scrambled to justify his actions. And if you were paying attention you learned a shocking lesson: that there was meaningfully nothing a Government in the UK could do which our media would not defend.
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
Some noise on my timeline about Keira Bell raising further funds to resist the anticipated appeal of the Tavistock to the Court of Appeal. I can't see anything ethically wrong with her conduct vis-a-vis crowdfunding.
It often happens when you succeed in a case for which you have obtained a costs-capping order that the costs you recover from the other side don't cover your liability to your own legal team.
Indeed, depending on the terms on which your legal team have acted, your liability to them might exceed the total of what you recovered from the other side plus what you crowdfunded. So you have to find more money even though you won.
Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
Schools 'reopening' - or not - could be quite a big moment for the country. We may be about to test the limits of what a widely distrusted and incompetent Government can achieve by command.
If parents refuse to send children to schools; if headteachers refuse to reopen schools; if teaching unions advise teachers not to turn up; if local authorities advise schools to close and fail to impose fines on parents; what then?
In a State with no meaningful checks on executive power - no higher law, no meaningful second house, a first house collapsing into the executive, a monopolistic state broadcaster... in a State like ours, how does the notion of the consent of the governed express itself?
Read 4 tweets
2 Jan
So, just before Christmas, Government what it called a "response" to this New York Times account of cronyism in pandemic spending. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
And I said, when that "response" - which you can read here gov.uk/government/new… - was published that every single notional rebuttal by Government of a claim made by the New York Times was false, misleading or both.

And it's time for me to make good.
Here's the first "rebuttal" by Government to the New York Times' claim that: "The government handed out thousands of contracts to fight the virus, some of them in a secretive V.I.P. lane."
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!