Larry Rendall Brock, a charged U.S. Capitol rioter seen with flexi-cuffs, was ID-ed by ex-wife.
"I just know that when I saw this was happening I was afraid he would be there. [...] It is such a good picture of him and I recognize his patch," she told FBI, per court doc w/ pics
"As a gang and criminal enterprise investigator, I have
interviewed many individuals involved in the racketeering and criminal activity," the FBI agent on the case.
My colleague @AlbertoLuperon will publishing details from the filing in our continuing coverage at @LawCrimeNews.
Follow him for more details.
The passage with Brock's ex-wife reporting him to the FBI National Threat Operations Center on Jan. 8, two days after the insurrection.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Following up on a pending access request, I asked chambers what discretion the judge has to provide *remote* public access if the parties do not consent to it. This question remains unclear.
I was told the court will consider and respond to our pending request by four news orgs.
To be clear, in-person access is allowed, but the late notice and the pandemic effectively amounts to a courtroom closure for many, at the request of the president.
Proceedings were scheduled to start 40 minutes ago.
This morning, there is going to be a federal hearing in Georgia in the case of Trump v. Kemp, but I have been told by chambers that there will be no remote public access because plaintiff declined.
When I expressed confusion about a party having any say over what access exists to our public courthouses, she replied that she was just conveying what was decided.
To avoid any confusion, I repeated: So Trump declined remote public access?
I'll update the story on the lawsuit with news about the arrest.
I am reaching out to Metropolitan Police for more information. Here is the NYT's coverage, which has been matched by multiple news outlets. nytimes.com/live/2021/01/0…
Watch the spin that follows the publication of this tape:
Someone seeking to “find 11,780 votes” is not looking for an investigation but an overthrow, whatever he says in the rest of the tape.
That reality cannot be soft-pedaled.
Some people are taking away from this story of a phone call from *yesterday* that Trump believes his own lies and delusions, which is a misinterpretation.
The fact that Trump threatens Raffensperger to manufacture 11,780 votes is pretty clear evidence that he does not.