Typically interesting and considered essay from @schneiderhome - much to agree with, some I don't: 2017 was far more a balance between populism and anti-populism than is made out here, and reassembling coalition it sustained is necessary in future... 1/n opendemocracy.net/en/rethinking-…
2/n ...and he is right to stress "against state" elements of GND, but this should go further: GND (if we use framing) must include adaptation and common ownership outside of the state...
3/n ...but it's an important rejoinder to the claim that (Brexit aside) it was comms that failed in 2019. The disjoint and mismatch between largely populist comms and largely technocratic policy was too great to work.
4/4 ...it would be useful in future to think through how the "from below" economic elements of Corbynism, around which there is a broad Labour Party consensus (worker ownership, Preston Model, etc) can be built into a populist comms strategy and framing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Meadway

James Meadway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!