1) Many private schools have high COVID infection rates, yet don't always report. So parents are paying good money to endanger the lives of their kids and themselves. 2) If the federal government did its job and stemmed the pandemic, public school buildings would be open.
As folks such as Kenya and I have pointed out, growing evidence shows that 1) youth get COVID, 2) the infection rates for youth under 18 is now often higher (double) the rates for the population overall, and @DrStevePerry
In countries where school buildings have remained open, notably the United Kingdom, teachers are getting infected with COVID at rates higher than the overall population. @DrStevePerry
Given how damaging COVID is (35% of those infected are debilitated long-term) especially to minority communities (78% of youth under 19 who die from COVID are Black, Latino and Indigenous), keeping school buildings closed until we reduce community spread make sense. @DrStevePerry
School buildings could be reopened if federal and state governments would shut down restaurants, bars and other activities.
But that takes doing things like additional pandemic aid that the current administration and Senate Republicans don't want to do. @DrStevePerry
That narrative happened because of flawed studies based on almost no testing of children and youth. Because the underlying dataset was lacking, the conclusions reached were also hot garbage. @DrStevePerry
One early 'study' came from YMCA, which operates preschools throughout the U.S. That report was based on self-reports by preschools. Which, by the way, weren't conducting COVID testing (because it was barely available at that point). @DrStevePerry
A key point to remember is that COVID testing for youth under 18 is lower, often by a magnitude of three or more, than for the overall population. Until recently, when kids did get tested, it was only because parents were also being tested. @DrStevePerry
Actually, Oster's data is highly flawed. As I noted back in October, Oster's dataset didn't include urban districts and is based on self-reports by schools (who, depending on the state and the number of students involved) don't have to report infections.
The funny thing is, even when you look at Oster's most-recent data, what you find is that teachers doing in-person instruction are getting infected with COVID at higher rates than the overall population. @DrStevePerrylink.medium.com/UeMdYtNtPcb
Oster, being an economist and not an epidemiologist, lacks credibility in discussing the matter of school buildings and COVID. Especially after she has been caught lying her tail off. @DrStevePerry
Especially when you look at data by states requiring schools to report COVID infections. Consider Florida (which has the least-reliable data because Gov. Ron DeSantis and his administration have been caught numerous times fudging data). @DrStevePerry
Now, Steve, you know you have my utmost respect. But the data doesn't agree with your assertion that school buildings can safely open during periods of high community spread.
In general, I agree. Just give everyone money and vaccines. At the same time, keep in mind that the result of folks 'cutting in line' is that those with the most will get vaccinated while the marginalized (especially Black, Latino, and Indigenous essential workers) get screwed.
The ultimate solution to that problem is for the federal government to be competent in vaccine distribution as well as stemming the pandemic (and community spread) overall. The latter would make it easier for most folks to wait their turn for vaccination.
If we're are all being honest, the deliberate failure of the Trump regime to stem the pandemic (as well as provide money for folks to stay home and avoid infection) is the single-biggest factor in folks trying to jump ahead of folks in most need of vaccination right now.
The facts themselves may or may not stand scrutiny based on what underpins them. A study can offer one conclusion, but if its dataset is limited or is based on a highly flawed element (such as self-reports), it is still a 'fact', but not necessarily useful.
If the 'fact' is made up, it isn't a fact at all. It's just fiction.
But in general, when based on actual information, facts are facts. Whether or not they are relevant in a context is another story. As is whether the conclusions gleaned from them are or aren't disputable.
The plantation was the pre-modern concentration camp. Death and depravity happened there. But a lot of what was done within them was working enslaved Black people to death. The same way the Nazis did with Jews and others at Auschwitz a century later.
The mistake most folks make is thinking that all concentration camps were only for committing immediate genocide. Not true. Most of Auschwitz's 31 subcamps were factories where Jews and others were worked to death for profit. Just like the average American plantation.
How about we also expel the rest of you Congressional Republicans because you have spent four years abetting and aiding the very insurrection Trump has fomented?
"Take the 1898 Wilmington insurrection, an all-American white nationalist riot also aimed at seizing state power, only it succeeded... what happened this week was not a case of chickens coming home to roost. The chickens had simply never left." nplusonemag.com/online-only/on…