0/ “What do you mean when you say you’re a ‘consumer investor’?”

I get asked this surprisingly freq, and my definition of “consumer” is broader than typical, so here are the 10 key things that define my professional interests/identity – my consumer investment philosophy 👇
1/ I’m passionate about (1) human behavior (why ppl think/do/buy what they do) and (2) brand building (how entities create their public identity/trust & derive value from it); investing is just a way to work w/ the coolest cos & ppl playing in that sandbox of behavior & brand
2/ As a consumer investor, I’m thus interested in anything that depends on direct consumer behavior/motivations (buyer need = user need) and brand building. That’s products, marketplaces, social, gaming, media, health & wellness, personal finance + much more
3/ As a result, I take deeply consumer-centric approach to evaluating new investments. Why does this category matter? What are the diff consumer segments? What makes them tick? What specific need does the product/brand meet? How easy is to meet those needs elsewhere? etc.
4/ I believe that the best brands combine functional needs and emotional needs. They have top quartile (better) + differentiated products in their specific category, and they deliver significant meaning beyond those products’ functional features
4b/ Let’s use @onepeloton to illustrate meaning beyond product: it can be personal satisfaction (“getting fitter”), community association (“part of a tribe”), identity signaling (“I’m the type of person who cares about fitness”), motivation (streaks, PRs, “it’s already here”) etc
5/ Being a consumer investor might seem frivolous but at its core it deals w/ what ppl care about on daily basis, whether it’s food, shelter, health, security, pleasure, entertainment, human connection, identity, fulfillment/achievement + much more. It’s deeply human.
6/ Great product + brand meaning/emotional connection are a necessary but not a sufficient condition for success; great unit economics, stellar distribution, customer acq arbitrage, well-designed customer service, and rockstar team w/ growth potential all matter just as much
7/ ABCD = Always Be Consumer Diligencing. I don’t understand how anyone can invest in a product (physical or tech) w/o trying it out, and more imp, w/o meaningful data on target customer trying it out. I roll my eyes at VCs who judge whole cat. based on wives’ opinion. Do better.
8/ Revealed consumer preferences > stated consumer preferences, which is why I invest exclusively in post-launch businesses (beyond that, I’m stage agnostic – seed through growth).

There is no better market test than the market itself.
9/ I strongly believe that consumer investment diligence magic happens at the intersection of deeply human-centric approach and smart use of data. I believe most investors don’t maximize the benefit of either and very few use both well.
10/ Diverse teams are harder to build & manage but they also tend to build better products & serve customers better bc they have fewer blindspots (market need, product dev, marketing, fulfillment, cust service). Not that diversity needs a biz case –it’s how I want to invest /FIN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mags 🔥

Mags 🔥 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magdalenakala

20 Sep 19
1/ Someone asked me today how I evaluate brands, esp in earlier stages. While it’s hard to boil down an investment approach to a simple framework, one of the imp things I consider is what I call (bc I’m a nerd🤓) „new TAM”:

Targeted
Analytical
Multichannel

Let me elaborate ⬇️
2/ Targeted: How specific the brand is in respect to whom it’s serving (& what are those customers’ needs). The whole point of challenger brands is to serve more niche customers/needs better than big corporates do (who need to build products that appeal to mass audiences).
3/ If you can’t clearly articulate who the target customer is and why your brand should serve their needs better than other ones do, you are dead to me (JK... kinda). If you have data on that target customer and your brand’s superior resonance, even better.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!