I was suspended for a week on @pudgenet because of this reply.
Note that not only is this reply not remotely “abuse” or “harassment,” but I was replying directly to a guy who was engaged in explicit harassment of a woman who did nothing but disagree with him.
His original post was actual abuse and harassment. He deleted it with a weak apology. But me criticizing him? Week suspension.
The last time I was suspended was for an actual autocorrect error, in which I called white supremacists “whore supremacists.” This time it’s for sarcasm, pointing out that the speaker was engaged in harassment. But the actual harasser apparently wasn’t suspended, and I was.
The harasser account was briefly gone … maybe he was suspended, too? Still, it is not like he was bad, and I was bad. I was being sarcastic, and he was being serious. Twitter is so dumb.
Now @miklmcculloch — the guy who stalked a woman for disagreeing with him, posting her LinkedIn account and work information — has blocked me. Sadpanda.
I was suspended a couple of times before this, and the “supremacist” typo: I offered that people should take my own career advice, and switch from journalism to software development. I got suspended for merely saying people should considering doing what I did.
So @miklmcculloch has apologized to me directly for what he did in doxxing the woman, and said he wants to do better. I accept his apology. Hopefully we can all do better.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Starting now, we are changing the way we do things at Twitter. Even though we have been following policies we created, that we thought were good and necessary, it just hasn’t had the desired effect of promoting good discourse. Effective immediately, we are changing.
The basic principle that now guides us is that instead of trying to manipulate discourse, we are opening it up, and making ourselves more transparent and accountable, and resisting attempts at censorship of us or our users.
Further, we have been fundamentally operating under the false premise that we, our our news and fact-checking partners, are smarter or better at understanding information than you, our users, are. This is a vain fiction, and we will drop this pretense.