Breaking - Nicola Sturgeon's government has spent more than £50,000 "preparing" civil servants to give evidence about the Alex Salmond affair at hearings where they suffered "collective memory loss", it has emerged.
Information obtained by The Daily Telegraph shows that
by early November, £54,378 of taxpayers’ money had been spent on external assistance to help senior civil servants get ready for appearances at a Holyrood inquiry.
The Scottish Government refused to say which organisation or individual had been hired, but members of the
committee branded the cost “astonishing” and said it raised questions over whether witnesses had been “coached”.
Staff logs released in response to a Freedom of Information request also show that witnesses spent several hours preparing for sessions, only to then face criticism
for “forgetting” crucial details, giving misleading evidence, or dodging questions.
Despite the extensive and costly preparation, and appearing under oath, four of the six civil servants were forced to correct or clarify their evidence after their appearances.
The committee
is investigating how more than £500,000 of taxpayers’ money came to be lost to Mr Salmond, after he successfully challenged the fairness and legality of a Scottish Government probe into sexual harassment complaints against him in court.
A source close to Mr Salmond said:
“The bill for the cover up continues to mount. It can hardly be said that they are getting value for money given the woeful performance of mandarins in front of the committee.
"It is clearly much more difficult, and much more costly, to dissemble than it is to tell the truth.”
The information relates to six senior civil servants who were involved in the botched inquiry, including Leslie Evans, the Permanent Secretary of the Scottish Government, Ms Sturgeon’s chief mandarin.
It shows that Barbara Allison, director of communications and ministerial
support, spent two weekends and set aside two working days to prepare for two evidence sessions.
She faced criticism after she twice claimed under oath in her first session that she had not received a text message from Ms Evans, in which she wrote “battle maybe lost but not
the war”, on the day Mr Salmond won his judicial review.
Mr Salmond’s allies believe the message is evidence of a conspiracy against him.
But Ms Allison wrote to the committee shortly before her second appearance, admitting she had received the message after all.
James Hynd,
head of cabinet, prepared for 21-and-a-half hours for one session. Ms Evans spent three-and-a-half hours preparing for her first two sessions, as well as conducting preparation work over two weekends. Judith Mackinnon, whose role investigating the allegations after having
prior contact with complainers ultimately cost the government its legal case on the grounds of “apparent bias”, spent 23-and-a-half hours preparing for her appearance in October. These included a 90 minute “trial run” the day before her appearance.
Alex Cole-Hamilton, the LibDem MSP and a committee member, said: “To learn that the government has spent more than £50,000 of taxpayers' money prepping civil servants to come before our committee, when their performance has been patchy at best considering the collective memory
loss that seems to have afflicted the civil service, is astonishing.
“It also raises the very real concern that these civil servants are being coached - that their answers are not natural, and once again, we might not be getting the full truth in our work.”
Murdo Fraser, the
Tory MSP who also sits on the committee, also questioned the Scottish Government’s tactics.
He said: “The SNP Government might want to consider asking for a refund of their £54,000 considering how many top civil servants have had to correct their evidence to the inquiry.
“They have wasted thousands of pounds on coaching civil servants how to answer questions. Surely, all that was needed was to speak the truth?”
Mr Salmond has been invited to give evidence to the inquiry in person on Tuesday.
He said on Wednesday he would not be able to
accept the invitation to attend next week, in part due to concerns over Covid restrictions. He suggested February 16 as an alternative date. Mr Salmond's team has also been in a legal wrangle with the Crown Office over the disclosure of documents obtained by him during his
trial at the High Court last year where he was cleared of a series of charges of sexual misconduct.
The Crown Office said he would be committing a criminal offence by divulging the information to the committee, a situation Mr Salmond believes will prevent him from abiding
by his oath to tell “the whole truth”, and the letter from his lawyer said an extension would allow more time to resolve the issues.
Meanwhile, Ms Sturgeon confirmed on Wednesday that James Hamilton, the former head of the Irish prosecution service in Ireland, could examine
“all of the allegations” against her in relation to his probe into potential breaches of the ministerial code. She denies all breaches, although Mr Salmond has accused her of repeatedly misleading parliament over her handling of the allegations against him.
If it is
established that she knowingly lied to parliament, Ms Sturgeon would be expected to resign.
Mr Salmond won a judicial review against the Scottish Government in January 2019. He was later cleared of all 13 sexual assault charges at his trial in March, following a separate
criminal probe.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “It is completely untrue that Scottish Government witnesses have been coached. In line with the Scottish Government’s commitment to cooperate fully with the committee, civil servants have prepared for and provided over
21 hours of oral evidence on complex and historical events, in line with the data protection, confidentiality and legal restrictions that apply.
“Scottish Government witnesses are providing evidence to the best of their knowledge on behalf of ministers. However they are also
giving their own recollections, under oath, of complex events that took place some time ago.
“Where further information or clarification has been required, we have followed up quickly in writing, including to correct inaccurate assertions by some committee members.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Clem Fandango

Clem Fandango Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ScotiaIndyref2

13 Jan
Civil servants' clarifications and corrections.
At an evidence session on September 15, Barbara Allison was asked whether she received a text message from Leslie Evans, in January 2019, stating “battle may be lost but not the war.” She twice claimed that she had not received
the message. However, she later wrote to the committee, ahead of a second appearance, admitting she had received it after all. She claimed she "must have deleted" the message. She maintains that she cannot remember what she sent to Ms Evans to elicit the response.
The Scottish Government has repeatedly been accused of obstructing the inquiry by refusing to hand over legal advice it received about Mr Salmond's legal challenge. Mr Salmond has claimed ministers continued to fight his case until January 2019, despite being warned in October
Read 11 tweets
13 Jan
What's in a name ?
Like many other church lands throughout the country at that time, some of the possessions described in the Inquest had probably passed into the hands of laymen, but were no doubt restored, as most of the lands specified can be identified among those
subsequently belonging to the bishopric. Those adjoining Glasgow, so far as identified, were situated to the east of the Molendinar Burn. It seems to have been considered unnecessary to mention the site of the Cathedral and Glasgow itself, unless such possessions are included
under designations that have not been recognised. All around Glasgow the lands not belonging to the Church seem to have been part of the royal domain, and the whole of that territory was disposed of by King David
before the close of his reign. Rutherglen was erected by him into
Read 13 tweets
13 Jan
For more generations than is comfortable to recall, Scottish servicemen/women have been at the forefront of the UKs projection of power. It was necessary in 1939-45 war against fascism but before that it was often to advance or defend British imperialism. The sentimentality
exhibited at any threat to the Scottish regiments, shows the Scottish mind still engaged with the idea of hard power. The new independent Scotland , if it wants to be influential in the International community should be projecting soft power. Power that delivers
humanitarian aid is preferable to power that delivers a bullet from a gun.

Juxtaposed to that military tendency, there is a broad streak of idealism in the Scots which makes them ready to respond to those in need or danger across the world. This policy gives expression to
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
By the end of 2020, the Holyrood inquiry had held 10 oral evidence sessions, given under oath, including several with Leslie Evans, the permanent secretary; the senior civil servants involved in drafting the sexual harassment policy used to investigate Salmond; and the
officials who carried out the inquiry. MSPs heard that officials were aware of unspecified rumours about Salmond, including alleged bullying.

The government has released thousands of pages of evidence to the committee but MSPs have repeatedly accused ministers of breaching
promises to do so quickly. After ministers repeatedly refused to release their legal advice on the Salmond case, Holyrood voted to insist it was handed over. The government has not given way, and the committee has only been allowed to see a summary of the advice.
Read 5 tweets
8 Jan
Alex Salmond has launched an extraordinary personal attack on Nicola Sturgeon, describing her testimony to the inquiry into sexual assault claims made against him as “simply untrue”.

In his submission to the inquiry, the former first minister said that Ms Sturgeon had misled
the Scottish parliament and broken the ministerial code which, if he is proven to be correct, would almost certainly spell the end of her political career.

Mr Salmond said that the breaches included a failure to inform the civil service in good time of her meetings with
him, and allowing the Scottish government to contest a civil court case against him despite having had legal advice that it was likely to collapse.
The allegations against Ms Sturgeon, who replaced Mr Salmond as first minister and leader of the SNP after the 2014 independence
Read 24 tweets
7 Jan
I WAS born at a place called Plean, in the parish of Ninians, in the shire of Stirling, where my mother's forbears were residenters for generations unknown, although I can only trace them to the days of Charles the Second. The name of my mother was Paterson, her mother's name
was Square. She was the daughter of Ellshander, or
Alexander Square, the companion of John Balfour of Burley in his Covenanting campaigns; My father's name was Dugald Cameron, he came from a place called
Braemar; his mother's name was Stewart. The earliest account I can give
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!