Tweet

DarkOwhitE

13 Jan, 7 tweets, 5 min read

I do times inbetween tweets. AFGSC. The red underlined is why I decided to compare these two. So the times highlight. 16:27 today from 12:27 yesterday.

Looks like this. So 2800 is our first stop.

I do like the "creeping" ref. Then we come to surviellence. Just funny to me is all. 16th for a day.

Next is 1166. Interesting that this too falls on the 16th.
1167 is this. Had to point out the 23. If you seen my previous tweets today you'll understand why I took a note.

1680 is this, creeping through the blinds? This is on the 4th. Makes me think 1/4 because of the dates. 4th and the 16th. What did the previous drop say? 25/100% Coincidence or purposeful? The bonus zoom. What are those numbers? Maybe I can clear it up. Post if I do.

Let the users implore if they want to check the last variations. Imploring own ones own accord is important. I really do believe anyone can do this with practice. I ain't no math ace, algo guy. Just a vet. Believe in yourself, stay determined.

@ThreadReaderApp

@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll.
Any errors in transposition let me know, try to steer clear of em!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @EOwhit

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

15 Jan

I do times inbetween tweets. Looking to the Airforce on this one. At 16:27 today. Grads, the first. See why I compared these two? This is at 19:17 (that 10 diff again).

The time difference looks like this. This is how I did it. Drops; 2110, 2117, 1270, 762.

2110, looks like this.

Read 7 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

15 Jan

This one will be short. I already did a mega thread today so. User friendly and time effective as possible. The 101st. So 15:14 today, minus 9:46am yesterday.

Math looks like this. I'm just looking at the seconds, then 1848, as it's on the big ass flag.

Remember the 101st Eagles. 1848 is this. Iron Eagle. Eager Lions. Previous thread, why that date is underlined. It's probably a coincidence.

Read 4 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

15 Jan

Try and do at least one of these a day. Time's inbetween tweets. Translate the hours and minutes back to the drops. Other time variations likewise. I'll illustrate. Looking at the NG today. These two. Prisons and "pods".

This is one of the tweets I implored users to check for themselves. Has a time of 9:00 am today. (Though NHNG posted the same pic on the 12th at 12:10 I believe). Second is this. Prison and "pods".

The subtraction or time inbetween the tweets looks like such. Let ya know the dates on these are weird. You'll see what I mean. 20 hours 30 minutes is the first stop. Drop 2030. Then the rest. 20.5 is drop 205 and 2050. 1230minutes to the drop. Then the seconds, well use 738

Read 14 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

14 Jan

I do time's inbetween tweets, take the results, translate the time variations back to the boards. I'll explain and illustrate the best I can. This is gonna be a long one. We'll use the orthodox method, then I'll illustrate another re-read using "keys"?. Here we go!

Looking at 3rd Special Forces, these two. Both of these are Rt's. One done one the 13th at 10:04am. The next one is the same thing, diff time/org. A day before 12th, at 21:29.

So this is what the math looks like. Tools make it easier.
So 12 hours 35m is now drop 1235. Time variations as follows, 1258, 755, 453 (and 1235).

Read 9 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

12 Jan

I do times in between tweets and translate them back to the boards. Here it is. Looking at Speacial Forces again. These two, 21:59 tonight. Love it! Why? That beret of course (some would disagree). Yesterday at 16:32.

Time inbetween looks like this. As you can see the last one in seconds have more ways to look at it (they all do really) however. 2927, 2945, 1767

2927, 2945 The link. Not sure how long Ted's had that up. Some time?

Read 6 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

11 Jan

Going through some re-reads, I came across this. Prompted to look at "corsi" I kinda felt the @ indicated it might be talking about a peep. Search "corsi et al" in duckduck.

Looks like this. Indeed, a person is reffed. Haven't done background on this guy yet. So discern and investigate on your own.

Now what I didn't tell you. I came to this tweet using the same thing I always do. Times inbetween tweets. Than translated back to the boards. Miltary is the way. 12:20 today, minus 12:22 from the 8th.

Read 6 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!