i hardly hear talk in my timeline about the direction twitter chose not to go in, given the premise of special status of some people. what would be different if people who had special status were held to *stricter* standards rather than looser ones?
if the rules behind someone being verified include that the user be famous in their own right off-platform, then presumably they should be able to get their fringe/violent/dangerous content out on some other platform. these people should be the *least* destabilized by suspension
i realize moving this piece around shifts a lot of other things around, but it's a suggestion i can't remember even seeing. twitter & in particular jack set the course of the discussion in such a way that this kind of idea didn't even occur to me, despite it not being that clever
maybe it's been considered and rejected for good reasons, but this thought has been knocking around in my head for a bit

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ali Alkhatib

Ali Alkhatib Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_alialkhatib

16 Jan
it's okay if you have a VAGUE sense of why people are so excited that Dr @alondra Nelson is going to be the deputy director for Science and Society in the Biden administration. but there are very specific reasons a lot of us are so excited that i want you to enjoy too:
Dr Nelson wrote *Body and Soul* - a history of grassroots organizing, an under-appreciated story of the Black Panther Party opening health centers and fighting for medical rights as a central plank in the fight for civil and human rights.
Dr Nelson wrote *The Social Life of DNA* - honest to god one of the landmark pieces of text for anyone thinking about the history of science and how science projects racism through genetics and DNA.
Read 5 tweets
15 Jan
i've been anxious about the utopia paper for many reasons. things i didn't have space to write about was one. another is that there are MANY people doing work in this area, but i either had to make a decision not to, or lost track of the thing that allowed me to ref them.
there was a conversation about "what is AI" and the critique that my use of the term (in the 1st draft) was loose to the point of meaninglessness. to make it more precise, i ended up working the paper into a corner where i was talking about systems that use models generated by ML
a lot of systems bake in assumptions about legibility not in data used for training, but in a handful of developers who are all white, have never needed food assistance, housing assistance, etc... so don't understand how people can appear in systems in ways that appear anomalous
Read 5 tweets
15 Jan
hi friends! sorry for flaking a bit

if you'd like to read my #CHI2021 paper "To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd Outcomes", you can download a preprint and take a read here al2.in/papers/chi/uto…

some more stuff in the next tweet
for lots of reasons i couldn't get into a few areas in this CHI paper, but there were a few threads i wished i had been able to unpack more, and entire directions of research that i totally couldn't fit into this, so i wrote about all that here: ali-alkhatib.com/blog/utopia-an…
lol unpacking threads. what am i talking about 🥴🙃
Read 4 tweets
15 Jan
for me the thing about the face/politics paper isn't the paper or the author. he's been doing unrigorous, shoddy, offensive work for years

what's wild to me is the apparent credulousness of the reviewers. like 5 people have to generally agree on the paper not being garbage

‽!?
i mean i know exactly how it happens; draw reviewers from an intellectually shallow pool and this is what you get.

but it always surprises me that from a group of ~5 people not 1 is like "are you people fucking serious? there's not even a mechanism. it's just gee whiz bullshit"
i think i just don't understand what this contribution is even trying to be. like

"didn't invent anything new, no new insight into the human condition, but here's a bricolage of generic components that'll say if someone's gay or liberal or smth. <ethics>privacy 👻</ethics>"
Read 6 tweets
31 Oct 20
it's incredible that Dara comes right out and says that the business model hinges on figuring out who needs flexibility so much that they'll give up healthcare and worker protections. the hope is to target a small enough group that they can never become politically consequential.
It sounds like Dara's read Ursula Le Guin's short story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas", wherein the people of Omelas lock up and torture a child in the supposed interest of everyone else's prosperity and happiness. to release the child would mean doom, the townspeople say.
what Dara wants you to do, having learned that we've been tormenting these workers, is to remind yourself that this is the only way we can be prosperous and happy - that if we let this small group of workers out from under the heel of his startup, it will threaten our prosperity.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!