1 of 40
THREAD
Why is Nancy Pelosi trying to incite a coup?
In one week, she:
1. Asked Gen. Milley to remove Trump as commander-in-chief;
2. Gave VP Pence 24 hours to oust Trump under the 25th Amendment;
3. Rammed through Articles of Impeachment.
nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/…
THREAD
Why is Nancy Pelosi trying to incite a coup?
In one week, she:
1. Asked Gen. Milley to remove Trump as commander-in-chief;
2. Gave VP Pence 24 hours to oust Trump under the 25th Amendment;
3. Rammed through Articles of Impeachment.
nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/…
2 of 40
We're told these steps are necessary because Trump is supposedly a dangerous madman.
Yet it's plain as day that the madness of the last four years was caused not by Trump, but by our own national security apparatus, led by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
We're told these steps are necessary because Trump is supposedly a dangerous madman.
Yet it's plain as day that the madness of the last four years was caused not by Trump, but by our own national security apparatus, led by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
3 of 40
Only 10 days after Trump took office in 2017, FOREIGN POLICY magazine literally called for a "military coup" against him.
FP is owned by the Graham family, which used to own the Washington Post when Katharine Graham brought down Nixon.
foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/30/3-w…
Only 10 days after Trump took office in 2017, FOREIGN POLICY magazine literally called for a "military coup" against him.
FP is owned by the Graham family, which used to own the Washington Post when Katharine Graham brought down Nixon.
foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/30/3-w…
4 of 40
FOREIGN AFFAIRS magazine echoed FOREIGN POLICY, urging "senior military leaders" to "resist orders" by Trump, and to consider removing him under the 25th Amendment.
foreignaffairs.com/articles/north…
FOREIGN AFFAIRS magazine echoed FOREIGN POLICY, urging "senior military leaders" to "resist orders" by Trump, and to consider removing him under the 25th Amendment.
foreignaffairs.com/articles/north…
5 of 40
From the outset of Trump's presidency, FOREIGN AFFAIRS repeatedly accused him of mental instability, urging "military leaders" and "cabinet officers" to stand ready to oust him.
foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
From the outset of Trump's presidency, FOREIGN AFFAIRS repeatedly accused him of mental instability, urging "military leaders" and "cabinet officers" to stand ready to oust him.
foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
6 of 40
Coming from top foreign policy leaders, these incitements rattled the nation, establishing insurrection and coup d'etat as the "new normal" in US politics.
Coming from top foreign policy leaders, these incitements rattled the nation, establishing insurrection and coup d'etat as the "new normal" in US politics.
7 of 40
FOREIGN AFFAIRS is the official journal of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
What is the CFR exactly?
And what's their beef with Trump?
jstor.org/stable/2702104…
FOREIGN AFFAIRS is the official journal of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
What is the CFR exactly?
And what's their beef with Trump?
jstor.org/stable/2702104…
8 of 40
It boils down to MAGA vs. MABA.
Trump wants to Make America Great Again.
The CFR wants to Make America BRITISH Again.
It's that simple.
It boils down to MAGA vs. MABA.
Trump wants to Make America Great Again.
The CFR wants to Make America BRITISH Again.
It's that simple.
9 of 40
The CFR has been called the "real State Department," as it effectively controls US foreign policy.
Widely viewed as the nerve center of America's Deep State, the CFR also happens to be a front for British interests.
hartford-hwp.com/archives/45/06…
The CFR has been called the "real State Department," as it effectively controls US foreign policy.
Widely viewed as the nerve center of America's Deep State, the CFR also happens to be a front for British interests.
hartford-hwp.com/archives/45/06…
10 of 40
The CFR rose from the British Round Table Movement.
British statesman Cecil Rhodes (1853 - 1902) left a fortune to promote "British rule throughout the world" and "the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire..."
The CFR rose from the British Round Table Movement.
British statesman Cecil Rhodes (1853 - 1902) left a fortune to promote "British rule throughout the world" and "the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire..."
11 of 40
After Rhodes's death, Alfred Milner took over his movement.
Beginning in 1909, Milner set up secretive "Round Table" groups in English-speaking countries, to propagandize for a worldwide, English-speaking federation, in accordance with Rhodes's vision.
After Rhodes's death, Alfred Milner took over his movement.
Beginning in 1909, Milner set up secretive "Round Table" groups in English-speaking countries, to propagandize for a worldwide, English-speaking federation, in accordance with Rhodes's vision.
12 of 40
Full federation proved to be a hard sell.
Britain's English-speaking colonies wanted independence.
So the Round Tablers proposed a compromise.
They offered "Dominion" status or partial independence.
Full federation proved to be a hard sell.
Britain's English-speaking colonies wanted independence.
So the Round Tablers proposed a compromise.
They offered "Dominion" status or partial independence.
13 of 40
Canada was to be the model.
It had gained Dominion status in 1867.
This meant Canada governed itself internally, while Britain ran its foreign policy.
Canadians remained subjects of the Crown.
The same deal was now offered to other English-speaking colonies.
Canada was to be the model.
It had gained Dominion status in 1867.
This meant Canada governed itself internally, while Britain ran its foreign policy.
Canadians remained subjects of the Crown.
The same deal was now offered to other English-speaking colonies.
14 of 40
The Round Tablers had to work quickly.
War with Germany was expected.
Britain needed to mollify the Dominions with self-rule, so they'd agree to provide troops in the coming war.
Australia became a Dominion in 1901; New Zealand in 1907; and South Africa in 1910.
The Round Tablers had to work quickly.
War with Germany was expected.
Britain needed to mollify the Dominions with self-rule, so they'd agree to provide troops in the coming war.
Australia became a Dominion in 1901; New Zealand in 1907; and South Africa in 1910.
15 of 40
The United States presented a special challenge.
We had been independent since 1776.
Moreover, our relations with Britain had been stormy, marred by a bloody Revolution, the War of 1812, border disputes with Canada, and British meddling in our Civil War.
The United States presented a special challenge.
We had been independent since 1776.
Moreover, our relations with Britain had been stormy, marred by a bloody Revolution, the War of 1812, border disputes with Canada, and British meddling in our Civil War.
16 of 40
Beginning in the 1890s, the British waged a public relations blitz called "The Great Rapprochement," promoting Anglo-American unity.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great…
Beginning in the 1890s, the British waged a public relations blitz called "The Great Rapprochement," promoting Anglo-American unity.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great…
17 of 40
Scottish-born steel magnate Andrew Carnegie called openly for a "British-American Union," in 1893.
He expressly advocated America's return to the British Empire.
Scottish-born steel magnate Andrew Carnegie called openly for a "British-American Union," in 1893.
He expressly advocated America's return to the British Empire.
18 of 40
British journalist W.T. Stead argued in 1901 for an "English-speaking United States of the World."
google.com/books/edition/…
British journalist W.T. Stead argued in 1901 for an "English-speaking United States of the World."
google.com/books/edition/…
19 of 40
From the British standpoint, the Great Rapprochement was a flop.
When Britain declared war on Germany in 1914, troops poured in from every corner of the Empire.
But not from America.
The US sent troops only in April 1917, after 2 1/2 years of hard British lobbying.
From the British standpoint, the Great Rapprochement was a flop.
When Britain declared war on Germany in 1914, troops poured in from every corner of the Empire.
But not from America.
The US sent troops only in April 1917, after 2 1/2 years of hard British lobbying.
20 of 40
To the British, the delay was intolerable.
It proved that Americans could not be trusted to make important decisions.
The Milner Group sought a "Canadian" solution — manipulating the US into a Dominion-like arrangement, with Britain controlling our foreign policy.
To the British, the delay was intolerable.
It proved that Americans could not be trusted to make important decisions.
The Milner Group sought a "Canadian" solution — manipulating the US into a Dominion-like arrangement, with Britain controlling our foreign policy.
21 of 40
It had to be done quietly, through back channels.
During the 1919 Paris peace talks, Milner Group operatives worked with hand-picked US Anglophiles, many of them Round Table members, to devise formal mechanisms for coordinating US and British foreign policy.
It had to be done quietly, through back channels.
During the 1919 Paris peace talks, Milner Group operatives worked with hand-picked US Anglophiles, many of them Round Table members, to devise formal mechanisms for coordinating US and British foreign policy.
22 of 40
On May 30, 1919, the Anglo-American Institute of International Affairs (AAIIA) was formed, with branches in NY and London.
However, anti-British feeling was rising in America.
Many blamed England for dragging us into war.
The NY branch separated from London in 1920.
On May 30, 1919, the Anglo-American Institute of International Affairs (AAIIA) was formed, with branches in NY and London.
However, anti-British feeling was rising in America.
Many blamed England for dragging us into war.
The NY branch separated from London in 1920.
23 of 40
Upon separation, the London branch was renamed the British Institute of International Affairs (BIIA).
In 1926, the BIIA received a royal charter, becoming the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), commonly known as Chatham House.
chathamhouse.org/about-us/our-g…
Upon separation, the London branch was renamed the British Institute of International Affairs (BIIA).
In 1926, the BIIA received a royal charter, becoming the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), commonly known as Chatham House.
chathamhouse.org/about-us/our-g…
24 of 40
Meanwhile, the New York branch became the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921.
After separating from Chatham House, the CFR continued working closely with its British counterpart, under a strict code of secrecy called "Chatham House rules."
Meanwhile, the New York branch became the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921.
After separating from Chatham House, the CFR continued working closely with its British counterpart, under a strict code of secrecy called "Chatham House rules."
25 of 40
The CFR pushes two agendas:
1. Anglo-American unity
2. Globalism
These are the same goals set forth in Rhodes's will, which called for a global Anglo-American union so powerful it would "hereafter render wars impossible..."
link.springer.com/chapter/10.105…
The CFR pushes two agendas:
1. Anglo-American unity
2. Globalism
These are the same goals set forth in Rhodes's will, which called for a global Anglo-American union so powerful it would "hereafter render wars impossible..."
link.springer.com/chapter/10.105…
26 of 40
The CFR is undeniably a front for British interests.
But that doesn't explain its hatred for @realDonaldTrump.
What has Trump done to threaten British interests?
And why is the threat deemed so severe that the CFR would call for military mutiny?
The CFR is undeniably a front for British interests.
But that doesn't explain its hatred for @realDonaldTrump.
What has Trump done to threaten British interests?
And why is the threat deemed so severe that the CFR would call for military mutiny?
27 of 40
I believe the answer can be found in the original writings of the Rhodes group.
In THE AMERICANIZATION OF THE WORLD (1901), W.T. Stead — Rhodes's close
collaborator — argued that Britain had only two choices.
Britain must MERGE with America or be REPLACED by her.
I believe the answer can be found in the original writings of the Rhodes group.
In THE AMERICANIZATION OF THE WORLD (1901), W.T. Stead — Rhodes's close
collaborator — argued that Britain had only two choices.
Britain must MERGE with America or be REPLACED by her.
28 of 40
By the 1890s, British leaders already knew that policing their Empire had become too costly.
Granting self-rule to the Dominions saved some money, by making the Dominions responsible for their own defense.
But military spending was still too high.
By the 1890s, British leaders already knew that policing their Empire had become too costly.
Granting self-rule to the Dominions saved some money, by making the Dominions responsible for their own defense.
But military spending was still too high.
29 of 40
In 1906, British banker Lord Avebury complained that the U.S. was getting rich at Britain's expense.
While the US profited from the Pax Britannica, Britain spent 60 percent more than America on its military, to keep the world safe for business.
google.com/books/edition/…
In 1906, British banker Lord Avebury complained that the U.S. was getting rich at Britain's expense.
While the US profited from the Pax Britannica, Britain spent 60 percent more than America on its military, to keep the world safe for business.
google.com/books/edition/…
30 of 40
Today, the situation is reversed in Britain's favor.
Now America polices the world, while British investors get rich from the Pax Americana.
British military spending is now a fraction of ours.
Coincidence? Or planning?
Today, the situation is reversed in Britain's favor.
Now America polices the world, while British investors get rich from the Pax Americana.
British military spending is now a fraction of ours.
Coincidence? Or planning?
31 of 40
British elites were not content with transferring the cost of empire to America.
They also wanted to retain control of imperial policy, thus having their cake and eating it too.
With the help of the CFR, they have come very close to attaining this goal.
British elites were not content with transferring the cost of empire to America.
They also wanted to retain control of imperial policy, thus having their cake and eating it too.
With the help of the CFR, they have come very close to attaining this goal.
32 of 40
The "New Imperialist" movement in Britain seeks to rebuild the UK's global influence, on the back of the US military.
British historian Andrew Roberts announced this new movement in a January 8, 2005 article in the Daily Mail.
The "New Imperialist" movement in Britain seeks to rebuild the UK's global influence, on the back of the US military.
British historian Andrew Roberts announced this new movement in a January 8, 2005 article in the Daily Mail.
https://twitter.com/RealRichardPoe/status/1322672951729246209
33 of 40
Calling for the "recolonisation of Africa," Roberts boasted that most African dictatorships would collapse at the "mere arrival on the horizon of an aircraft carrier from an English- speaking country..."
DOWNLOAD PDF
ligali.org/pdf/Daily%20Ma…
Calling for the "recolonisation of Africa," Roberts boasted that most African dictatorships would collapse at the "mere arrival on the horizon of an aircraft carrier from an English- speaking country..."
DOWNLOAD PDF
ligali.org/pdf/Daily%20Ma…
34 of 40
Roberts did not say WHICH "English-speaking country" would be expected to provide aircraft carriers for such adventures, but I'll give you three guesses.
Roberts did not say WHICH "English-speaking country" would be expected to provide aircraft carriers for such adventures, but I'll give you three guesses.
35 of 40
More than a hundred years have passed since W.T. Stead warned that Britain must merge with America or be replaced by her.
Little has changed.
British elites still face the same choice.
They cannot accept an American-led world.
So they must find ways to control us.
More than a hundred years have passed since W.T. Stead warned that Britain must merge with America or be replaced by her.
Little has changed.
British elites still face the same choice.
They cannot accept an American-led world.
So they must find ways to control us.
36 of 40
15 years after announcing the "New Imperialism," Roberts and his fellow imperialists continue pushing for Cecil Rhodes's dream of an English-speaking union, this time in the form of the so-called CANZUK Treaty.
15 years after announcing the "New Imperialism," Roberts and his fellow imperialists continue pushing for Cecil Rhodes's dream of an English-speaking union, this time in the form of the so-called CANZUK Treaty.
https://twitter.com/RealRichardPoe/status/1292406220503035905
37 of 40
In his book A HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING PEOPLES SINCE 1900, Roberts breezily suggests that America would be better off as a Commonwealth Realm.
If you don't know what a Commonwealth Realm is, see the thread below.
In his book A HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING PEOPLES SINCE 1900, Roberts breezily suggests that America would be better off as a Commonwealth Realm.
If you don't know what a Commonwealth Realm is, see the thread below.
https://twitter.com/RealRichardPoe/status/1283524260489834496
38 of 40
On pages 512-514, Roberts notes that, if America were a Dominion like Canada, we would have been spared the national trauma of Watergate.
The Queen would have simply stepped in and fired Nixon.
No need for any democratic process.
google.com/books/edition/…
On pages 512-514, Roberts notes that, if America were a Dominion like Canada, we would have been spared the national trauma of Watergate.
The Queen would have simply stepped in and fired Nixon.
No need for any democratic process.
google.com/books/edition/…
39 of 40
Trump has taught us that MAGA and MABA don't mix.
The instant we get a president who stands up for America, the British go loco.
It's clear we cannot be "great" and "British" at the same time.
We must choose one or the other.
Trump has taught us that MAGA and MABA don't mix.
The instant we get a president who stands up for America, the British go loco.
It's clear we cannot be "great" and "British" at the same time.
We must choose one or the other.
https://twitter.com/RealRichardPoe/status/1334536396447621120
40 of 40
For further reading on the hidden history of the CFR, see these books by Prof. Carroll Quigley (1910-1977):
TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)
THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT (1981)
See also Inderjeet Parmar's THINK TANKS AND POWER IN FOREIGN POLICY (2004).
For further reading on the hidden history of the CFR, see these books by Prof. Carroll Quigley (1910-1977):
TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)
THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT (1981)
See also Inderjeet Parmar's THINK TANKS AND POWER IN FOREIGN POLICY (2004).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
