Note to galaxy brains: if you think that the right response to being shaken down by the FBI at the behest of an internet troll is to keep silent lest you "give trolls ideas," then you are not being very thoughtful about this.
I'm an immigrant whose citizenship application and residency are at stake. I came forward about my experience despite that because people deserve to know that this is happening and that federal law enforcement is enabling it.
2/
The idea that the troll who sicced the FBI on me was some kind of Louis Pasteur of Internet Hate whose unique insight led them to invent this incredibly creative tactic is...foolish. Making false reports to cops to shut up your opponents is as old as Plato. At least.
3/
Try your argument out on other situations:
"Are you a woman who was terrorized by stalkerware? Shut up lest you give other stalkers ideas!"
"Did you get swatted and nearly killed? Don't blow the whistle or trolls will know it works!"
4/
It's 100% true that being affluent, stable and employed by an org full of super-effective civil rights lawyers made me uniquely able to weather this tactic.
You shouldn't need that kind of privilege to be a person on the internet who doesn't have to worry about the FBI.
5/
The thing to do with that kind of privilege is USE IT. Use the fact that you have access to lawyers and an audience and are less vulnerable to retaliation to tell people what happened so they can know about this messed up system.
6/
This has been a public service announcement.
That is all.
eof/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With the deplatforming of forums where trumpists and right-wing figures congregate, there's a lot of chatter about whether and when private entities have the right to remove speech, and what obligations come with scale.
1/
The most important - and overlooked - area of this discourse is the role that monopoly plays, and the role that anti-monopoly enforcement could play.
2/
In short, the fact that being removed from Twitter and the app stores and Facebook and Amazon is so devastating is best addressed by weakening those companies by spreading out our digital life onto lots of platforms.
3/
The Democrats are at least two parties. The progressive wing of the party (which is by no means unified) and the finance wing of the party, which is also the party leadership.
1/
During the leadership race, the progressive wing was represented by @SenSanders and @SenWarren; the former wants to minimize the role of markets in our lives, the latter wants to redeem markets by regulating them. It's a distinction with a difference, but I donated to both.
2/
Both wings of the party have prominent representatives in Congress; Sandersism are most visibly associated with @AOC (whom I donated to) and Warrenism is embodied by @RepKatiePorter (likewise), who was also one of Warren's law school proteges.
3/