Egregious misrepresentation of the political culture in US by Dhume. In US the polity is deeply split and there is no universally respected journalist, unless we go by the opinions only of the beltway elites. Some hard facts in the thread below:
The Democrat base considers Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson of Fox News as stooges/enablers of Trump. Throughout the Trump era, as per Nielsen’s ratings the opinion shows by these two were in the top 3. Hannity would be at the top, Tucker 3rd. In the last year Tucker became 2nd.
On the other side of the political isle, GOP base considers Rachel Maddow, Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo as propaganda arm of the Democrats. For most the Trump era, Maddow’s show had second highest ratings per Nielsen. Lemon+Cuomo were somewhat lower but still quite high +
In 2020 things changed somewhat. Maddow dropped to 5th, all four ahead of her were Fox News shows, Hannity, Tucker, Laura Ingraham, Lemon+Cuomo got to somewhere down. But Democrat base ridicule Hannity, Tucker, Laura all the time. So no universally respected journalist.
Incidentally, Dhume was saying great things about Chris Wallace some time back. He should check the ratings of his shows. Doesn’t figure in top 20 may not even be in top 50. This is the respect US public has for the journos respected by Beltway elites.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saswati Sarkar

Saswati Sarkar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sarkar_swati

17 Jan
If Modi wanted or wants he can do a lot of good for the Indian tech sector, but of course he won’t. Build the Indian internet. Technology already exists, resources are no big deal for a nation state. This would end the control of Big Tech on India+
What is Indian internet? Servers owned by GOI, web browser, Video base, SM (Public messaging eg Twitter + Facebook, Private messaging like Whatsapp, Signal, Telegram), Search Engines like Google all owned by GoI, like BSNL. Next develop apps for these for BSNL phones.
Rejuvenate BSNL phones. It used 2 bs quite good even a decade back.Rebuild it.Communication independence 4m Corp. tech sector is a must as the Parler story shows. But of course Modi would do no such thing. He would genuflect to Corporates & try 2 be in good graces of tech lords.
Read 5 tweets
17 Jan
BJP-RSS’ propaganda empire relies entirely on Big Tech- Facebook, Twitter. FB wins Whatsapp which is the primary vehicle for BJP-RSS’ propaganda. Zukerberg-Dorsey cartel can shut it up with a waive of their wands. Alternatives havent been created+
Modi’s simple solution - genuflect to big Corporates, public interest can take a hike. This plan will stop working just as soon as Big tech locates a viable alternative, Cong isn’t one at this point+
No matter how much Modi genuflects Big Tech will at best consider his GoI a stop gap arrangement, they will never consider his GoI to be their GoI. Because of cultural differences +
Read 5 tweets
16 Jan
Mexico is a small country next to US. But Mexico is taking a principled position against Big tech censorship of political rivals of the incoming US regime. Something for Modi to learn? But he is perhaps more vested in the next Howdy Modi.
Modi’s foreign policy has been the most delusional of all PMs in the recent past, that tells a lot. Starting from impromptu visits to China, oath taking Sharif invite drama, swing diplomacy with Xi-all disasters.He doesn’t get that sycophancy of Biden won’t get him brownie points
While sycophancy of Biden admin won’t get Modi a single Brownie point, standing for principles will help him fortify his public goodwill. The latter he will need in ample measure in days to come. Hit jobs on him have just started.
Read 5 tweets
16 Jan
The crucial gap in Nidhi Razdan’s account of how she was phished is the lack of details on the interview process she went through. Interviews for regular faculty jobs involve a seminar. And all seminar’s are put up on University event lists + ndtv.com/blog/how-i-fel…
Was she asked to give a seminar ? If not, that is the first thing that should have struck her. If she did give a seminar, why weren’t Harvard announcing the seminar on their event list.
If these did not strike her, then she knows nothing about the academic hiring process. It is the job of a journalist who is going to teach journalism to know such processes. That she did not tells a whole lot about her competence as a journalist.
Read 4 tweets
16 Jan
Nidhi Razdan writes on how a phishing attack duped her.A major gap: She says she was interviewed online. If they interviewed her with video on, they couldn’t impersonate specific Harvard professors. If their video were not on why did she trust the process? ndtv.com/blog/how-i-fel…
If there were genuine Harvard professors interviewing her on video, then she shud have got a regret email after the interview, since Harvard did not actually hire her. Presumably she did not get that. So, the online interview was not on video as video impersonation impossible.
I also believe that an associate professor candidate would not be able to tell a fake audio interview. For senior level hires there would be at least one individual who the candidate knows personally, otherwise senior hires don’t happen. She couldn’t tell her voice ?
Read 6 tweets
11 Jan
The Global Conseq Of The Tech-Lash Will Be Severe - interesting article by ⁦@MrMaitra⁩ . My question- is this “tech lash” making a strong case for state owned big businesses, i.e. socialism.Who do u want to be the most powerful-elected or unelected?+ thefederalist.com/2021/01/11/the…
Crystal clear now that in US, the temple of capitalism if you will, the supreme power is wielded by a group (aka cartel) of major Corporates, not the elected state. These Corporates can decide who can do business (eg, Parler can’t), who can speak. All are unelected+
Is the inevitable consequence of uncontrolled market, the free market, that a group of Corporates will become more powerful than the state. They would even decide who can sue since they control lawyers, again, Parler example.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!