Writing and researching on the cultural history of vaccination and vaccine hesitancy has given a particular edge to my anger as I watch outspoken anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers triumphantly get their vaccines ahead of people who have fought for their validity and necessity.
I've only come to appreciate the immense power of cultural narratives that surround medical practice. How and why we talk about medicine in public matters just as much as the science behind the procedure itself. Good public health has to be accountable to those publics.
I've said this to bioethicists, clinicians, to pre-meds, to my own students in literary studies: if it were reducible to the science itself, we wouldn't have such robust cultures of anti-vaccination and vaccine hesitancy. The virality of these discourses are our shared problem.
Wringing our hands over the supposed novelty of this crisis and the speed with which misinformation spreads in a digital age bypasses the difficult, humbling work of confronting history. None of this is new.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The academy's ableist practices, especially expectations of neurotypicality, are ensuring futures of higher education without disabled scholars. #MakeAbleistsUncomfortable
As Mel Y. Chen has put it, you either comply with being a "disciplined cognator," or you are the "unthinkable" in academia's ableist cultures of hyperproductivity to be left behind or kept out.
Disabled faculty, staff, and students all have to navigate academic spaces and environments never made for them even despite legislation that is meant to ensure those spaces be accessible. Their presence means they have survived repeated forms of ableist cruelty. Not all do.
Apparently unpopular opinion: the best thing I ever did in graduate school was begin writing for public audiences and not seeing peer-reviewed and paywalled academic journals as the only space where urgent conversations happen.
This becomes especially clear with scholars claiming to do social justice work but then entirely divorcing their work from those communities they claim to speak for. Writing to and for those publics should be central. They are not your tenure material.
And quite frankly, if we are handwringing over the “crisis in the humanities,” and public scholars are writing in ways that are making clear why our work is valuable and urgent, doubling down on the profession’s norms is gatekeeping that costs all of us.
I've been getting a lot of messages over the past few weeks about good readings for the anti-vaccination stuff going on, so here's "Immunity and Vaccination: a Syllabus"! /1
Nadja Durbach's Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in England, 1853-1907 (fascinating study of the Victorian anti-vax movements and their relationship to the gothic, liberalism, and activist organizing. This was the largest anti-medical campaign in western history!
Elena Conis' Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization ; James Colgrove's State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth-Century America (extremely useful for understanding how we got to our current moment in American anti-vax culture)