Let's discuss the environmental cost of bitcoin. Because despite all the push for sustainable and green investment in the tech sector, there's a giant smoldering Chernobyl sitting at the heart of Silicon Valley which a lot of investors would prefer you remain quiet about. 🧵 (1/)
TLDR on bitcoin economics: It's a pyramid-shaped investment scheme backed by the collective delusion that value can created out of nothing by convincing greater fools to buy it after you do. (2/)
That alone is sufficiently awful on its own merits, but on top of this the environmental damages of bitcoin are enough to make even Greta Thunberg weep at the pointless waste of it all. (3/)
The underlying technology of bitcoin is based on the notion of "mining", a technical term for a process that keeps the network running and processing transactions. (4/)
I won't cover the details of the algorithm, suffice it to say the premise of bitcoin mining is to prove how much power you can waste, and the more power you can waste, the more tokens you can probabilistically secure in exchange for your energy waste. (5/)
And so people have set up entire warehouses of computer hardware dedicated to run 24/7 consuming power and performing the trial computations required by the protocol. Globally this consumes *nation state* levels of energy to keep it all running. (6/)
Bitcoin mining is essentially a fucked up version of Candy Crush where you solve puzzles for coins, except the coins go to buy darknet fentanyl, launder money for warlords and provide gambling for hedge fund managers. (7/)
And the scale of this waste has some scary numbers attached to it. A single bitcoin transaction alone consumes 621 KWh, or half a million times more energy consumption than a credit card payment. (8/)
The bitcoin network annually wastes 78 TWh (terrawatt hours) annually or the energy consumption of several *million* US households.
WolframAlpha gives some scary comparisons to help you relate to how much energy this is (think nuclear weapons). (9/) wolframalpha.com/input/?i=77.78…
Unlike other economic activities, the bitcoin scheme produces absolutely nothing for all this waste. It is a pure speculative activity of people gambling on the random movements of prices and the only output is simply shuffling numbers around in a computer at insane cost. (10/)
In addition to the energy waste and CO2 emitted, the mining process itself requires constant replacement of hardware and produces a steady stream of waste from broken and exhausted computer parts. All of which are full of toxins and rare earth metals. (11/)
The network produces 11.27 kilotons of waste annually or 96 grams of electronic waste per transaction. This is the equivalent annual e-waste as several small countries and equivalent to the waste of 482,456 people living at the German standard. (12/)
Try to imagine a future where paying for your morning coffee involved smashing an iPhone and burning enough fossil fuels to run your entire household for 60 days. That's the environmental cost of the "revolutionary" technology behind #Bitcoin in a nutshell. (13/)
Climate scientists have estimated that #Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C. And this is just one of *hundreds* of other cryptocurrency networks that run on this apocalyptically wasteful set of ideas. (14/) nature.com/articles/s4155…
Climate change is not some abstract threat happening elsewhere, it is very real, and is happening everywhere we chose to invest in unsustainable and wasteful technology.
The absurd waste of bitcoin is a simultaneously both an environmental and a moral disaster. (15/)
Stephen, this is really bad, how can I help change this?
* Don't buy bitcoins.
* Tell friends not to buy bitcoins.
* Consider ethics of holding dirty companies ($MSTR, $SI, $SQ, $PYPL, Coinbase) in your portfolio.
* ... and products (funds, ETFs, etc) with crypto exposure.
/fin
As a final aside, this is very politically solvable. In the next administration Biden could stop the Bitcoin Waste Problem with the stroke of a pen.
Banning US persons from trading these digital investment contracts is well within the powers of executive branch.
/done
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's talk about and analyze the SEC vs. Binance lawsuit. Because I've never seen anything like this before. This is 136 pages of pure madness. One for the history books. 🧵 bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Binance is a vertically integrated stack of conflicts of interest built around regulatory avoidance.
Their own ICO token is allegedly an illegal security offering.
🧵 I adore the clarity of writing in this article, but there's a logical contradiction in the conclusion. For the tokens to "mean something" —as Matt concludes— they need to have both:
1) Ties to the real-world economy 2) Subordination to the rule of law
1) For tokens to "have meaning," they must represent a legal claim on either future cashflows, physical goods, or people's labor. At which point they definitely become securities.
The only reason tokens exist is that people want to gamble on volatile claims with no underlying.
2) For tokens to have treatment in the legal system. The courts need to be able to seize assets, rearrange estates and adjudicate fraud. At this point, then, we have centralized custodians, which undermines the aims of the technology and results in a logical contradiction.
How many of these projects have to topple over before we just admit the "underlying technology" politicians love to wax lyrical about is just rubbish, and a distraction for not enforcing regulation on crypto scams. risk.net/derivatives/79…
IBM shut down its some 2000-person division for "supply chain" applications. This was widely heralded as the killer application, and it never worked. theregister.com/2022/11/30/ibm…
Happy to announce that the Crypto Policy Symposium will have two exceptional keynotes. 🧵
Day 1: Honourable Brad Sherman from the United States House of Representatives, and Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Investor Protections crypto-policy.tech
And on the subsequent day, from the other side of the pond, we are very privileged to hear from:
Day 2: Alex Sobel, MP for Leeds North West, and member of House of Commons of the United Kingdom.
We are very blessed to have such a range of excellent speakers for this event from so many different backgrounds and professions. And are very thankful to all our volunteers for making this event happen.
After months of hard work, happy to say 'Popping the Crypto Bubble' is now out in print and just in time for the crypto meltdown. This book represents our effort to write the first rough draft of history of one of the craziest bubbles in human history. 🧵 amazon.com/dp/B0B4B9J4RK/…
This text is a complete and total intellectual deconstruction of the entire cryptocurrency narrative. A narrative that rests on both technical, legal, social and economic absurdities which unfortunately require quite a bit of background knowledge to refute.
Crypto feels like a new phenomenon but we show how it is not. It's simply speedrunning every financial mistake of the last four hundred years. Everything from South Sea Bubble, Wildcat Banking to Beanie Baby mania. And the biggest lie in finance is that this time is different.
Today the global community of technologists sent a letter to Congress urging them to resist the crypto industry’s lobbying influence. The letter was signed by some of the most respected scholars and technologists in our field. And now we need your help. 🧵 ft.com/content/f4b2fa…
Crypto fraud is spiraling out of control. So-called "web3" is not going great. Regulators are paralyzed and people are getting hurt left and right. It's on us as citizens and responsible engineers to help fix the problem we created by our inaction.
Crypto lobby is spending millions to tell leaders that crypto-assets are "innovation" and all fintech innovation is unqualifiedly good, no matter the human cost. Today we set the record straight on what computer scientists really think about blockchain.