THREAD: This article is a prime example of the fraudulence of elite law school discourse and the dangers that elite people at elite institutions can pose to marginalized people when they whitewash history. (1)
The marketing of this article is trying to get you to think the evils of the DOJ are the b/c of Trump. We are told that we need a "cultural restoration." What does that mean? "Restore" what? Prior to Trump, DOJ was the largest force of racist human caging in world history. (2)
We are told that we must "insulate" DOJ from "political influence." What? Every fiber of DOJ history is about political influence. It was for political reasons that it targeted poor Black people for crack and ignored the crimes of bankers. Read history (3) yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-puni…
Interesting story: when I uncovered massive illegal debtors' prisons of Black people in 2014 and federal crimes committed by state court judges, DOJ wanted to meet with me. They acknowledged crimes by prosecutors and judges but declined to charge them for *political reasons* (4)
DOJ led the rise of mass human caging and has separated millions of children from their parents with no evidence of any benefit, targeting Black and immigrant families. Read about just one of the pre-Trump DOJ catastrophes. (6) nytimes.com/2015/08/18/opi…
Elite lawyers want you to think there is something "apolitical" about mass incarceration: using guns and chains to (selectively) enforce drug laws, protect property rights, borders, enclosures, distributions of wealth, etc... That's propaganda. It's as political as it gets. (7)
Finally, as I've shown, the @YaleLJournal article/tweet is part of an effort to whitewash the horrific history of the DOJ and normalize a career at DOJ for a future generation of elite law students. (8)
THREAD: I've never spoken publicly about this: when presented with overwhelming evidence that judges had committed federal felonies, multiple Obama US Attorneys chose not to prosecute them because it would hurt the integrity of the legal system (1)
The crimes were among the most serious and violent crimes imaginable: judges using their offices to illegally cage Black people and separate them from their children to generate revenue from collecting debts. (2)
I'm not saying I would support prosecution--just that when US Attys wanted to meet with me and saw the *flagrant crimes* uncovered by our public lawsuits, they decided that they would instead devote their resources to prosecuting immigrants and poor people for drugs (3)
1. This country separates parents from their children and puts human beings in cages for possessing plants on a list of plants the government says you can't have.
2. This country separates parents from their children and puts human beings in cages for crossing an imaginary political boundary it created through colonial invasions.
3. This country separates parents from their children and puts human beings in cages based on whether they can access enough cash to purchase their release on bail.
1. Police are what protects the property of people who own things. In the US, this means something specific: white elites stole the labor and land of Black and indigenous people for centuries and then continued to break their own laws (with the help of police) to extract more.
2. White elites did this through the state violence of slavery, racial terrorism and lynching, busting organized labor, race-based lending and foreclosures, widespread academic and employment discrimination, prison labor, fines/fees, etc...
3. One of the main functions of modern US police is to preserve THAT distribution of wealth, land, and resources that resulted from THAT pillage.