We remember Martin Luther King for his cinematic dragon-slaying—his iconic speeches and confrontations—but what’s lost is all the long-haul work that queued up those moments. A thread: <1/18>
King makes clear in Stride Toward Freedom, his memoir of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, just how much time he spent in the mundane work of winning the community’s trust, joining organizations, weaving together coalitions through multiple meetings, and planning gatherings. <2/18>
The whole beginning of his memoir is about the not-so-thrilling work of forming church committees: a religious education committee, a social service committee, a scholarship fundraising committee, and a cultural committee. <3/18>
Early on in Montgomery, he writes, most of his time was spent performing marriages and funerals, preparing the weekly service, visiting the sick, and attending various church planning meetings. “Almost every week I attended from five to ten such group meetings,” he writes. <4/18>
Why was King trusted to lead the boycott? Because he had spent the months leading up to it religiously attending various local organizations’ meetings. He first joined the NAACP’s local branch and helped them with fundraising. <5/18>
He then joined the Alabama Council on Human Relations, an interracial group of reverends helping to fight for racial equality in Alabama. He then started going to meetings for the “Citizens Coordinating Committee,” a group formed to build unity among local leaders. <6/18>
The story we’re told—about how “Rosa Parks sat down and the community stood up”—leaves out the most important part: Parks, King and hundreds of other committed people had put in the week-in, week-out work of sustaining local organizations before the boycott ever started. <7/18>
And that doesn’t even include all the meetings that went into building the organizations that made up the coordinating organizations that hosted the meetings that sustained the boycott. <8/18>
The only reason King’s congregation at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church was ready to be politicized is because the church’s prior pastor, Vernon Johns, had been organizing and activating them for years. <9/18>
The only reason there was a Women’s Political Council for King to coordinate with was because nine years prior, forty-one women came together to found it. <10/18>
The local branch of International Bricklayers Union gave King office space—and the only reason they were able to do that was because local bricklayers built and sustained a union hall over the previous four decades. <11/18>
Though she’s remembered as a dragon-slayer, Rosa Parks herself was also a long-haul hero: When she was arrested, she was already a decade into being the elected secretary of the Montgomery branch of the NAACP. <12/18>
Parks’s heroic confrontation was the spark—but sparks go nowhere without the long-haul gathering of tinder. <13/18>
The bus boycott ended up lasting 381 days. You can sustain a week of action based on a passionate reaction to a dramatic incident. But to sustain a 13-month long campaign, you need something deeper than reaction—you need commitment. <14/18>
It reminds me of something the organizer Ella Baker once wrote in a report back to her team headquarters in the 1940’s: “I must leave now for one of those small church night meetings which are usually more exhausting than the immediate returns seem to warrant... <15/18>
...but it’s a part of the spade work, so let it be.” Spade work—preparing the soil for action—is what's needed today. <16/18>
We are in the beginning of so many long hauls in America: toward a deeper democracy, toward a sustainable energy system, toward the next Reconstruction. <17/18>
I think many people today are willing to lay down their life for causes bigger than themself. But that's not really what we need today. We need more people, like King, willing to lay down part of their daily life to them. Grab your spades—let's get to work! <18/18>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pete Davis 🌱

Pete Davis 🌱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PeteDDavis

26 Aug 20
I can't recommend enough centering your politics around the advancement of policies, rather than solely politicians. What's interesting about policy-centered politics is that it's both substantially radicalizing and interpersonally moderating at the same time. Here's why:
It's substantially radicalizing because the more you look under the hood of how systems work—and how many wonderful alternatives are being underutilized—the more you are outraged. I'm constantly thinking "Wow, it's even worse than it looks" and "The alternatives are everywhere!"
But it's interpersonally moderating, because there are strange bedfellows and surprising collaborators on so many different policy campaigns. Often the best ally on advancing a policy is the one most different than you on everything else. So you can't alienate too many people.
Read 8 tweets
9 May 20
For those debating the religious left right now, I highly recommend David Campbell and Robert Putnam’s book, “American Grace,” which is filled with very informative, nearly-comprehensive history, charts, and analysis of all aspects of American religion today.
Some surprising charts in there. For example: Progressives get more political in sermons, whereas the religious right moves their ideas through talk in the pews:
Here's one on how much your faith affects politics — and how conservative that politics is:
Read 9 tweets
25 Feb 20
It’s helpful to learn about the moral ethic of socialism — but I think it’s also helpful to learn about the various institutional elements that make up socialism, too. These elements are never really unpacked in the campaign debates, leading to confusion. Here’s seven major ones:
1) UNIONS: workers, tenants, small producers, & consumers organizing to collectively bargain with employers, landlords, platforms, and corporations
2) COOPERATIVES: workers, tenants, small producers & consumers having legal mechanisms to collectively own businesses, housing, land, platforms, etc. [+ mixed versions of worker ownership, such as ESOPS and codetermination.]
Read 11 tweets
3 Feb 20
The Dem generational divide seems to be due to the fact that boomer liberals lived through decades of ideological defeat, so they don't believe we can win. They only know dashed '60s dreams & 50 years of right-wing ascendance. They think of themselves as "battle-weary realists."
The young, in turn, have only lived through the atrocities of right-wing domination and the catastrophic failure of the "Diet Republican" strategy of combatting it. We also think of ourselves as "battle-weary realists"—but the realism of seeing that we need to try something new.
When the boomers see bold fighters today, they think of feckless hippies that failed to stop the right-wing ascendance in the 70s and 80s. When millennials see tepid non-fighters, we think of the feckless consultants that failed to turn the tide in the 00s and 10s.
Read 5 tweets
18 Jan 20
One powerful theme that no 2020 candidate has fully tapped into yet is the idea of what might be called "intimate disrespect"—the disrespect you might receive at work, at home, in your neighborhood from the people who see themselves as your superiors. Here's what I mean:
Reactionaries, @CoreyRobin has argued, are defined by & organized around the project of defending against subordinates asserting their power—men against women asserting their power, whites against blacks asserting their power, bosses against workers asserting their power.
These evoke so much passion, Robin argues, because they're so intimate: your daughter talking back to you, your maid taking a day off, your waiter not finding your joke funny, your intern being creeped out by how you treat her, your worker not being grateful for their job.
Read 13 tweets
17 Jan 20
There's this idea in social theory called Structure vs. Agency. Structure is the patterns of society that shape us; agency is our capacity to shape the structure. One way to think about democracy is that it's the process of widening our agency over the structure.
The least democratic society is one that is all structure and no agency. Society gives you a script—and we all follow it. To democratize that society is to loosen the structure and increase our agency over it — to turn the tables, reform the structure, re-write the script.
Democracy is not libertinism — it's not about no structures and no scripts. Rather, it's about what could be called 'plastic structures' (we can re-form them!) and 'editable scripts' (we can re-write them!).
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!