This year is going to offer an opportunity for righting a lot of the wrongs of the last four, but those wrongs aren't going to right themselves. Here's one of them. bringjeanhome.org/january
Jean Montrevil is an immigrant rights activist and member of @judsonchurchnyc who was kidnapped away from his family and deported three years ago. Judson and @NewSanctuaryNYC are trying to bring him home, and you can help.
You can learn more about Jean's case above, or from this article, but if you're in Virginia, a quick thing you could do is let @GovernorVA know that a pardon in his youthful conviction is in the interests of justice, mercy, and decency. theintercept.com/2020/01/16/jea…
That's Ralph Northam, @GovernorVA. (804) 786-2211 and ralph.northam@governor.virginia.gov . Hell, even if you're not from Virginia. bringjeanhome.org/january
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
None of the chatter on the Ben Sasse piece in The Atlantic has quoted what strikes me as the most interesting line. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
"No one should be surprised that QAnon has found a partner in the empty, hypocritical, made-for-TV deviant strain of evangelicalism that runs on dopey apocalypse-mongering."
Or the line that follows that one: " (I still consider myself an evangelical, even though so many of my nominal co-religionists have emptied the term of all historic and theological meaning.)"
Lots of minimum-wage-hike critics wandering around imagining that corporations set their prices pegged to a specific set rate of profit rather than charging whatever the market will bear at a given moment.
"If you raise the the wages of fast food workers, McDonald's will charge more for Big Macs!"
"Why?"
"So they make more money!"
If they'd make more money by charging more for Big Macs, they'd be doing it already.
What McDonald's will do if the price of labor goes up is MAKE SLIGHTLY LESS PROFIT. That's what'll change. That's your argument. Have fun with it!
Hot take: The $2000/$1400 stimulus check issue isn't going to make a difference in the 2022 or 2024 elections.
The feeling in the Biden camp is presumably that they were saying $2000 before the $600 passed, so topping up the $600 with another $1400 is following through on their original plan. I think that's bad messaging, but reasonable on substance.
I'd like further left policy than I'm likely to get from Biden, on this and a thousand other issues. But if Trump had vetoed the $600 two weeks ago, it seems obvious that Biden would be proposing $2000 now, and that they see this as the same as that.
Just on the level of basic competence, we haven't seen any evidence at any point that there's anyone in Trump's White House who has the ability to write the speech he just gave.
My gut tells me that the speech was handed to him from outside the WH pretty much as we saw it, and he was given an ultimatum: read it or else.
Folks are asking who I think wrote it and what the "or else" was. The obvious answers are "McConnell's writing staff" and "he gets barred from running in 2024," but I have no specific insight.
We're at nine Republican yes votes, zero Dem no votes, on impeachment. Forty-seven votes outstanding.
With 19 votes left to be cast, we've now got a solid majority of the House voting yes on impeachment. Donald Trump is the first American president to be impeached twice.
And the tenth Republican yes vote just came in, with eight Republicans outstanding.
When I was in my early twenties, I had a temp office job for a publishing company that had just moved into new offices in lower Manhattan.
Right before they'd moved in, a basement storage room my division was using had flooded, and my boss decided a good way to guard against the recurrence by having a huge shed built. In the basement. Of the office building. In lower Manhattan.