The real story of QAnon starts almost exactly one year before Q's first "drop" on 4 Chan. In late October 2016, Steve Pieczenik, former PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE EXPERT with the CIA and the State Department, put out a You Tube video in which he claimed...
...of having launched a "countercoup" against Hillary and Bill Clinton with the help of a secret group in intelligence and the military to prevent the Clintons from stealing the 2016 election. Pieczenik described how his group was allied with JULIAN ASSANGE to use the DNC...
..and Podesta emails to foil this plot by Bill and Hillary Clinton.
This story is a variant of two opposing stories in the saga of the 2016 election that dominated news and politics for the past 4 years--The QAnon story and the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks story...
...that claims Russian spies stole the DNC emails to help elect Trump, which is the fascinating part about this whole phenomenon. Check out these videos below to see what I mean:
Pieczenik announces his countercoup:
INFOWARS commences its promotion of the Pieczenik claims:
Infowars had a huge following while it was on You Tube which brought the Pieczenik claims to that large audience. By early 2017, the position of Infowars was that the Democratic Party was completely defeated and no longer had any ability to resist Trump's administration.
Long January 3, 2017 interview. Comments about Democratic Party being "irrelevant" in first half hour.
In late 2017, Mueller filed his first indictment in the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks "investigation." This contradicted Pieczenik's position that Mueller and the Democratic Party were impotent and no threats to Trump. This posed a problem for the Pieczenik narrative of countercoup.
Enter QAnon--Q takes Pieczenik's place as head of a secret group in intelligence and the military working against The Cabal. The prediction is Q's group, in alliance with Trump, will bring down The Cabal in what is called "The Storm."
Early Pieczenik interviews on Infowars of November-December 2016 claimed "The Storm" was Pieczenik's countercoup, but that already happened. There is now a need for such a movement with a FUTURE payoff. That became "The Storm" borrowing from David Wilcock and...
...Benjamin Fulford's predictions. During early 2018, JEROME CORSI, then running Infowars' Washington, DC desk, starts his own QAnon You Tube channel, as Infowars embraces Q as an intelligence source, contradicting Pieczenik's claims of "The Storm" happening in 2016.
Since Mueller's investigation actually had teeth, making it impossible to keep claiming Pieczenik's countercoup of 2016 made the world safe from The Cabal, changes had to be made that sent Pieczenik's countercoup down the memory hole. That is Q's purpose...
...Q replaces Pieczenik. The 2016 countercoup is replaced by THE STORM, which has not yet happened, so the world is still imperiled by The Cabal, not already rescued as Pieczenik told us in 2016. Simple cut-and-paste.
With Q becoming part of Infowars with the efforts of Corsi, the large Infowars audience feeds into the You Tube channels and blogs featuring Q's cryptic posts on 4Chan, and later, 8Chan. That this pivot actually worked without anyone wondering what happened to...
..the 2016 Pieczenik countercoup is testimony to the public's lack of concentration and critical thinking. The links to both are simply not deniable. The legend, an intelligence term for a false biography, of Q as countercoup leader exactly copies Pieczenik's.
The public is not the only one that had trouble keeping it all straight. In a July 2018 interview on Owen Shryoer's Infowar's show, Pieczenik corrected Shroyer when Shroyer predicted that THE STORM "was coming." Pieczenik said it already happened, meaning the countercoup.
The supreme irony in all of this is that not only does the legend of Q flow from the Pieczenik claims of the countercoup, but Trump-Russia-Wikileaks, the conspiracy theory of the LEFT, also flows from the Pieczenik countercoup.
In the above videos, we hear Steve Pieczenik claim that Julian Assange, using the DNC and Podesta emails, made the countercoup against Hillary in the 2016 election possible. This makes me wonder if both the RIGHT and LEFT sides of this conflict both originated...
...from the same source, and have been nurtured from that same source.
That is scary territory.
I had to get this from The Wayback Machine because it is no longer on the Internet:
As you read the above article from the archived June 4, 2017 Infowars Web site, this is the source of the 2017-2018 editorial position at Infowars that there was nothing on the horizon that could possibly disturb the Trump Administration.
In 2017, Infowars echoed Steve Pieczenik in telling their audience that the Democratic Party was spent, a political empty husk that could do nothing to stop Trump. In 2018, The Storm was on the way thanks to QAnon.
Then the Mid-Term elections took place. Suddenly, Pro-Trump people weren't "in the streets of Berlin" near victory over The Cabal, but were slugging it our in the hedgerows of Normandy, stuck in the beachhead lodgement. Alex Jones knows what I mean.
@threadreaderapp I need an unroll, please. I accidentally deleted this one once before!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@McAdooGordon They don't do their homework and cannot read statutes properly. Three of the four counts in Smith's indictment on the J6 case are not applicable to what Smith wrote in the main body of the indictment. Judges should have checked the elements of the statutes, 18 USC 241,,,
@McAdooGordon ...and 18 USC 1512 have no elements that apply to any of that case.
Trump did not perform any acts of physical violence on anyone, and certainly did not do such things while wearing a disguise. Lawyers keep reading the Title of the Statute, "Conspiracy Against Rights," and....
@McAdooGordon ...just charge someone with 18 USC 241, the anti-KKK statute from the 1870s. The title means nothing. The elements of the statute are what determine if someone is chargeable. Smith was actually accusing Trump of violating 18 USC 1346, "Scheme or Artifice to Defraud,"...
With the passage of amendments to the Electoral Count Act, the Vice President, as President of the Senate, can no longer make unilateral decisions of this kind, but is only there for ceremonial duties. These measures were passed in 2022 to make sure such decisions cannot be...
...made by the President of the Senate.
I don't they could after the Hayes-Tilden contested election that included "Alternate Electors'" certificates of votes along with the "Certificates of Ascertainment" submitted by the governors of some former Confederate States in 1877.
@pitch4kdemocrat@marklevinshow@MarcSeeks Ask yourself why there are only 30+ counts in the indictment when 337 total documents were involved in the investigation. Let's take a look back to see what happened to the rest of them.
@pitch4kdemocrat@marklevinshow@MarcSeeks The First 197 documents with classification markings were inside 14 of the 15 boxes that were sent by Trump to NARA. It was THOSE documents with classification markings that were sent to the National Security Division (NSD) of the DOJ for Jay Bratt, the chief of NSD for...
@EdKrassen According to the US v Miller (1939) the maintenance of a "Well Regulated Militia" means that those firearms most like those used by the military are the protected arms under 2d Amendment.
@EdKrassen "In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia,
@EdKrassen "we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment,
@Chris_D_Steele So, we can be confident that Putin had compromising information about BOTH of the candidates of the two major parties since you reported as much in the dossier, starting in the first memorandum.
@Chris_D_Steele "Asked about the Kremlin’s reported intelligence feed to TRUMP over recent years and rumours about a Russian dossier of ‘kornpromat’ on Hillary CLINTON (being circulated), Source B confirmed the file’s existence. S/he confided in a trusted compatriot that it had been collated by
@Chris_D_Steele "Department K of the FSB for many years, dating back to her husband Bill’s presidency, and comprised mainly eavesdropped conversations of various sorts rather than details/evidence of unorthodox or embarrassing behavior. Some of the conversations were from bugged comments..
@emeriticus Not a thing odd about semi-covert CIA connections in situations like this. Here's some more:
In their book, THE ESPIONAGE ESTABLISHMENT, David Wise and Thomas Ross discuss the findings of the Church Committee about how CIA used charitable foundations as money laundries.
@emeriticus One man running the MD Anderson Foundation of Houston, Texas as a "conduit" for CIA money was LEON JAWORSKI, the Special Counsel investigating Watergate.
@emeriticus On Twitter today, we find another example: