Stephen McIntyre Profile picture
Jan 20, 2021 86 tweets 28 min read Read on X
Solomon has published two new documents, only one of which is listed on his Dig Here page justthenews.com/sites/default/…. and is rehash of notes released by Grassley in Dec. See my thread here

Some new info in other doc justthenews.com/sites/default/…
2/ Solomon said that the 302 of the Steele October 2017 is the "first" declassified document. Solomon told Lou Dobbs yesterday that he would be up all night with the releases. Morning has come and thus far. the 302 is the ONLY declassification. Image
3/ most of the content of the 302 was already known from the (redacted) SIA notes on the Steele Oct 2017 interview which were published in December 2020 and slightly, and mostly irrelevantly, less redacted in this version.
4/ the October 2017 Steele 302 is relevant, but mostly shows the uselessness of FBI questioning and their total and incompentent subject matter knowledge. In particular, they didn't challenge - or even ask Steele about inconsistencies between Danchenko interview and dossier.
5/ we still haven't seen ANYTHING on, for example, Steele's original Oct 2016 interview with FBI, Danchenko's two subsequent interviews with FBI, the intel memos on Danchenko interview, attribution of DNC hack to Russia, on and on..
6/ if we don't see anything more, Trump's declassification is as fraudulent as his pardon list. Either he capitulated out of fear of the Senate vote on impeachment or he's the useless fraud that his opponents have portrayed.
7/ '@jsolomonReports Is That All There Is?


Looks like John Solomon's kraken was another fraud.
8/ without ANY enthusiasm, I'm going through the 302 vs the previously released Agent Notes to see if anything new and/or left out in 302. First two paragraphs more or less correspond. Image
9/ Steele wanted to be sure that information from his Oct 2017 interview would go "straight to Mueller", not just FBI. SIA Auten and SSA [Woodbery] (my interpolation - Woodbery was SSA in London who was ALAT, also pal of Strzok, former CoS for Priestap) re-assured them. Image
10/ this is interesting: Steele was concerned about inclusion of their (fraudulent) material in the ICA - an issue that was FAR more important than the Carter Page FISA issue which Gonna Graham promoted as big issue to distract attention and gaslight. Image
11/ Steele (and Burrows) rightly regarded use of Steele dossier in ICA (and immediate illegal leak to media to undermine incoming Trump administration) as an important issue and raised it repeatedly - a big point OMITTED from 302.
12/ statement that Steele and Burrows regarded Trump as their "main opponent" ought to have raised FARA issues, but didn't. This statement in 302 has raised eyebrows, but was already known from Dec 2020 release. Image
13/ next few points in 302 track Auten's notes (slight change in order). Confirms that Danchenko had been source of prior reports (some of which we've seen from State Dept productions. They are porn for intel agencies - fantasies that fulfil intel agency desire.) Image
14/ I'm skipping one paragraph before coming back to it for reasons that will become clear. Steele hadn't heard of Page, Cohen, Papadop; had been working on Manafort. Had heard of Tillerson - redacted in 302, but not in Auten's notes. Image
15/ Auten's redacted notes conspicuously did not contain ANY mention of Sergei Millian, who was framed by Steele and/or Danchenko. But Millian is known to have been mentioned by Steele to FBI and appears (my interpolation below) to be mentioned in 302 paragraph, redacted in Auten Image
16/ a note on this interpolation and Steele's lie to FBI. The redaction in first line in 14 characters with 7-character surname. We KNOW that Danchenko told FBI that he heard Ritz Carlton rumor from Ivan Vorontsov, but couldn't confirm it. Image
17/ Both Ivan Vorontsov and Sergei Millian are 14 characters. But surname (5th line) is 7 characters, excluding Vorontsov. We KNOW that Steele had (falsely) named Millian as source in 2016. W
18/ We also KNOW that Danchenko had not heard of Millian in June 2016, attempted to initiate contact by email on July 21 (while Millian in Asia), that Danchenko NEVER met Millian and told this to FBI.
19/ nonetheless, FBI, a year later, sat like doorknobs while Steele once again (falsely) told them that Millian had been source for Ritz Carlton story which Danchenko attributed as unconfirmed from Vorontsov. This was low-hanging fruit on which FBI ought to have challenged Steele
20/ but the doorknobs let Steele continue unchallenged. As detectives, more like Ace Ventura than Colombo. Without Ace Ventura's acumen.
21/ Steele was then asked about his validation. He claimed to know the "current positions" of PSS' "sub-soubsources". No details here. Galkina, the most important sub-subsource, was then in Cyprus as an unemployed former employee of a webserver company in a bitter custody dispute Image
22/ did FBI doorknobs inquire as to how Galkina in Cyprus was privy to Putin's innermost secrets that had eluded CIA for years? More likely, Steele dangled big names, all real people but not actual sources. As Yuri Shvets pointed out within days of Steele dossier publication.
23/ Steele (falsely) told FBI that he "confirmed" Danchenko's reporting through "other sources". Zero evidence of that for Steele dossier. Who "confirmed" the collusion allegation? Nobody. Who confirmed Sechin-Page meeting. Nobody. Image
24/ next, Steele rambled that Orbis had four discrete networks. New agent assigned to Russia. A source whose description is unaccountably redacted in 302, but who is described in notes as looking at Rybololvev (discussed later in 302.) Prob funded by Dan Jones' Dem oligarchs. Image
25/ this next is outrageous. Steele, trying to coax PSS, said Danchenko "coming along with idea of talking to" Mueller but wasnt there yet. Compare to Mueller intimidation of witnesses in Trump orbit.

Dig-here: looks like Mueller lawyers NEVER interviewed Danchenko (or Steele). Image
26/ next, the publicized story about Fiona Hill having introduced Danchenko to Steele ~2011. I deduced this from the Danchenko interview last summer, so this ought not to be regarded as "news", tho confirmation is welcome. Image
27/ next, a redacted and tantalizing paragraph to do with Ukraine. "someone who was Ukrainian could possibly have the type of access his source has".

What does this mean? Why is it redacted? Looks very suspicious. Image
28/ next some chitchat about Danchenko's travel experience while spying in Russia irrelevant to main Russiagate issues. Image
29/ Steele said that they "destroyed materials for legal reasons". What was legal reason? Looks more like bigger obstruction of justice than any of Mueller's actual charges. Image
30/ Steele also told FBI that he took three trips [to US] in 2016. We KNOW that Steele met Perkins Coie on Jul 29, Yahoo and others on Sep 23 and Kavalec et al on Oct 11. He told FBI that he "talked with his subsource" on these trips.
31/ it seems obvious that Steele met with Danchenko while he was in US as Danchenko lived in northern Virginia, but FBI didn't ask Danchenko about his meetings with Steele in US, even tho it pertained to their purported espionage on Trump in US (not just "Russia").
32/ for example, Steele's explosive and mendacious Report 95 must have been written on or about Jul 27-28, just prior to his Jul 29 meeting with Perkins Coie. How exactly and when did Danchenko convey information from "Millian" to Steele? FBI doorknobs didn't ask.
33/ continuing. Steele told FBI Orbis had obtained audio of conversation between Danchenko & [Olga Galkina] regarding (false) information re Cohen meeting in Prague. Steele said they didn't have original audio "in original form", but had transcription. Galkina maybe "coming in". Image
34/ Horowitz report indicated that Galkina had been interviewed in August 2017 - prior to Steele interview, but we havent seen Galkina interview. FBI doesn't seem to have asked Steele to provide Galkina transcript.
35/ Steele told FBI that Danchenko sub-sources had "serious access to named people REDACTED tight circles". Uh, huh. Vorontsov. Galkina who did PR for webserver in Cyprus. Did either of them really have "serious access"? Pretty questionable. Image
36/ next, an unredacted paragraph discussing Orbis' prior involvement with Manafort. This was litigation against Manafort by Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch who had helped FBI in Levinson case. Steele's story on start of relationship with Fusion is a bit different than Simpson Image
37/ Steele is known to have gone to Cyprus around July 6-13, 2016 - after meeting Gaeta in London. Steele reported being briefed about Rubolovlev. Redaction can be infilled as "early July". Not related to dossier. Image
38/ this next is important. Almost totally redacted in both Auten notes and 302. But it contains important admission by Steele to FBI that he and Danchenko were carrying out espionage in US ("bit of work in the United States"). As we know, it involved "Millian". Image
39/ beneath the redactions, there appear to be a couple of important lies. Steele says that PSS "was introduced REDACTED", that the PSS "met REDACTED" and PSS "and [Millian] discussed REDACTED". We KNOW that Danchenko and Millian NEVER met. This is all false information.
40/ that Danchenko never met Danchenko was KNOWN to FBI since January 2017 interview in which Auten participated. So FBI KNEW that these statements by Steele were untrue but FBI Ace Venturas didn't confront Steele on falsehoods.
41/ Steele further embellished his false claims about Danchenko meetings with Millian by claiming that he had seen "some documentation" and that REDACTED wasn't "notional". Outrageous that loser Trump failed to unredact this important material.
42/ Steele then drew a diagram of the sub-source network, said to have been attached to the 302. Diagram was withheld by bureaucrats, as petty defiance. Image
43/ Steele's description of sources on Carter Page contained false information. Existence of supposed Sechin meeting came from RBC reporter Lyudmila Podobedova, but on Diveykin came from Galkina. For details, check tweets by FN and myself in late July. FBI didnt challenge "error" Image
44/ also, and this is important: while Danchenko network gave (false) information on existence of meetings, the vivid details in Steele dossier about the "meetings" are wildly embellished from Danchenko's account. E.g implausible 19.5% brokerage fee.
45/ my own surmise is that Steele (or someone in his office) constructed a fantasy on sparse framework of (untrue) information from Danchenko. The embellishments were known to FBI but it did not require an accounting from Steele for embellishments.
46/ continuing this thread: FBI asked about reporting about Oleg Govurun, which Steele ascribed to redacted subsource. Image
47. Govurun was mentioned in Steele #112 as a supposed bagman in St Petersburg between Alfa bank and Putin. Alfa Bank officials Aven and Fridman sued Steele for libel. Image
48/ Danchenko touched on Report #112 only in passing but comment interesting: he said that topic "hearkens back" to his time at Brookings with Clifford Gaddy (and Fiona Hill). In both interviews (Danchenko, Steele), FBI immediately segued to new topic. Image
49/ they segued to brief discussion of reporting about Peskov. In context, that had little to nothing to do with collusion allegations and was little more than background chickenfeed into which the big allegations were dropped. Name redacted in both. Image
50/ in Danchenko interview, source relating to Peskov was SOURCE 3, who we've identified as Olga Galkina, then recently working in PR in Cyprus for a webserver company. Image
51/ character count in Steele 302 doesn't match to Galkina in any way that I can thus far figure out. Steele's practice appears to have been to claim that known and important people were his sub-sources (as opposed to Galkina and Vorontsov.) Image
52/ then some discussion about Steele's decision to talk to Mother Jones. He said that Fusion pressured Steele to do so. Steele's regret was that the fallout disrupted his ability to feed information into FBI. Image
53/ something interesting: Ohr knew abt Steele's Oct 2017 meeting with Steele, who had "reached out" to both Ohr and Simpson about PSS. Up to May 2017, Ohr had immediately notified FBI of his contacts with Steele. These 302s STOP on May 16, 2017. At start of Mueller investigation Image
54/ Ohr and Steele had talk on Aug 7, 2017 and again on Sep 9, 2017, a week before Steele's 2nd interview with FBI. Did Ohr memorialize these two calls for FBI and Mueller? If not, why not? ImageImage
55/ next, they return to question of whether PSS Danchenko will choose to honor the Special Counsel with his presence. Other people were given subpoenas or jackboots at dawn. But Danchenko seems to have had choice. In the end, Mueller doesn't appear to have interviewed PSS. Image
56/ next they discuss PSS' "tradecraft", with Steele emphasizing supposed precautions. However, Danchenko's "tradecraft" included open line cell phone conversation with Galkina in mid-July while he was at a public swimming pool. Probably Volta or Francis pools in Georgetown. ImageImageImage
57/ Seems hard to believe that Danchenko and/or Galkina wouldn't be persons of interest to both western and Russian intelligence. Or that unencrypted international cell phone calls weren't intercepted. GCHQ has huge collection center in Cyprus where Galkina was located.
58/ FBI and Steele then return to Fiona Hill. Steele said that he contacted Hill in Feb 2017 after Danchenko went to ground and surmised that Hill "guesses" that Danchenko was involved in dossier. Then a redacted comment about Danchenko in context of Hill and Brookings. Image
59/ FBI had doubled back to Fiona Hill. Now they doubled back to validation of PSS and possibility that PSS is under "control" of some other agency. Steele says not, though he "cannot guarantee" that subsources "aren't under control". Image
60/ next paragraph almost totally/totally redacted in both 302 and notes. Means that it's prob interesting. What is it? Something about sharing "election-related reports". Involving someone that he "knew from his previous career" who has 11 letters in names (12 with space). Image
61/ There's a very delicious candidate, who fits both on character count and as someone Steele knew from previous career: Pablo Miller, who came into public view at time of Skripal poisoning. Would be very big deal if Miller placed with Steele in 302.
eurotrib.com/story/2018/5/2… Image
62/ next 302 para: Steele says that he is "hesitant" about sharing information with CIA, NSA and a redacted entity, supposedly because of concern over security (while supposedly having no such concern about leaky FBI). Sounds more like flattery. Corresponding Auten note redacted. Image
63/ something else interesting that emerges from this seemingly pedantic cross-comparison of Auten notes and final 302. The next paragraph of Auten notes has NO corresponding entry in 302 - unlike everything or almost everything so far. Take a look and I'll comment more. Image
64/ the information left out by Auten and FBI pertains to a report by Steele's new Psub on SBU's report on Manafort. The new PSS says that information provided by Ukrainian SBU to FBI about Manafort being a Russian agent, being run by FSB, has been "doctored" by Kyiv !! Image
65/ Steele's new agent says that the information was doctored by Kyiv to "justify surveillance" of Manafort. Steele endorsed the new P-sub and anticipated having further information on the Ukrainian fraud in the following week. Image
66/ this replaces a tweet that I sent out a couple of minutes ago. While there is no corresponding entry in this part of the 302, I double checked the balance of 302 (about half way through) and there is an entry that corresponds to some of this material. I'll comment then.
67/ next, FBI asks about Danchenko's "physical security". Discussion is redacted. Why? Danchenko lived in northern Virginia. Why would he be at risk? Or, at least, at any more risk of random murder than Seth Rich or any other Washingtonian? /sarc/ Image
68/ next, they discussed PSS' contact with "Russian establishments". Auten notes are totally redacted; in 302, Steele mentions something "strange, but nothing alarming". Also discusses something to do with Kalugin. Image
69/ Mikhail Kalugin, a Russian diplomat located in Washington in 2016, had cameo appearance in Steele dossier (Report 111, Sept 14, 2016). His (apparently routine) transfer home was portrayed in Steele/Danchenko intel porn as fallout from DNC hack. Image
70/ Danchenko was asked about Kalugin in Jan 2017 interview - Kalugin's name was redacted but is identifiable in section shown below. Image
71/ FBI asked Steele whether Danchenko had been approached by journalists. Steele said yes, and that this had spooked Danchenko, causing him to go to ground. (To my recollection, it's not established that Danchenko told Steele that he'd been interviewed by FBI.) Image
72/ previously, Danchenko told FBI that, as of Jan 25, 2017, he had been approached by two journals, but neither seems to have suspected his secret identity as PSS. (Danchenko frequently made public comments on Russia affairs.) Image
73/ returning to Steele 302 thread: FBI asked Steele whether sub-sources aware that their information used in dossier. To interpret Steele answer, keep in mind that Millian never met or provided info to Danchenko whereas Galkina and Danchenko were long-time friends since Perm and Image
74/ reference to Gubarev is to story in Report 166 about Alexei Gubarev and Webzilla - who had been Galkina's employer in 2016 and with whom Galkina was in bitter dispute. After FN identified Galkina as Source 3, multiple articles: rt.com/usa/504856-ste… wsj.com/articles/russi… Image
75/ Danchenko had also been asked about Gubarev-Webzilla story, a topic on which FBI seem to have examined Danchenko and Steele more thoroughly than the actual collusion allegations. Gubarev-Webzilla story is subject of libel cases in both UK and US. ImageImage
76/ Steele then segued to then recent death of Oleg Erovinkin. This is interesting segment given subsequent intel pornography as Erovinkin was not PSS or sub-source. Steele told FBI that he "does not believe" that Erovinkin was a subsource. Image
77/ Erovinkin, then 61 years old, had died on Dec 26, 2016 of a heart attack in his car. He was a former FSB agent who was then working for Sechin's Rosneft. totpi.com/former-russian… Image
78/ shortly after publication of Steele dossier on Jan 10, 2017, the Telegraph telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/2… archive archive.is/kGcSc published intel porno fantasy purporting to link Erovinkin death to Steele dossier.
79/ they cited an intel pornographer in Bulgaria, who stated that Putin had Steele dossier "on his desk" at the time of Erovinkin's death and implied that Erovinkin had been arkancided on Putin's personal instruction. Image
80/ this fantasy continued to be promulgated by Fusion GPS lawyer in 2018
cbsnews.com/news/fusion-gp… - it was, needless to say, a convenient excuse to avoid answering questions about fabrication of collusion allegations in US and/or UK. Image
81/ story continued to feed intel fantasies by US media. thedailybeast.com/was-this-russi… It was all, of course, untrue.
82/ given importance of this story, one would have expected Mueller to have determined that Erovinkin was not an actual sub-source, but Mueller thugs ignored this important and relevant allegation, while pursuing minute details of Manafort taxes and Skadden Arps report on Ukraine
83/ next FBI discussed info security with Steele, who told them that sensitive documents were kept offline. Steele also told FBI that all documents re dossier had been destroyed "for legal reasons" and inconsistently claimed to have docs on some meetings. FBI didn't pin down Image
84/ as first day wound down, FBI asked Steele about potential "dangles" - which caused Steele to bring up Cody Shearer, which they discussed the next day. (I'll pick this up later on. I personally think that Cody Shearer unimportant to dossier and wildly overstated by proponents) Image
85/ in last item in Auten notes, Steele claims dirt from Kazakhstand and Cyprus within "remit of Special Counsel", but looking for money ("how much support can be expected going forward"). No corresponding entry in 302 here. No Auten notes for Steele's 2nd day, only 302. Image
86/ this ends long thread on first day of Steele Oct 2017 interview. For second day (documented thus far only by the 302) see here

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen McIntyre

Stephen McIntyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateAudit

Apr 13
New thread on new information from redactions.

I just noticed that the information in Binder on Trump briefing in Aug 2016 was previously published by Grassley in July 2020, a few days after identification of Steele Primary Sub-source (and thus we, in this corner, were otherwise preoccupied).
grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…

The new version sheds light on a previous redaction. Katrina, Norm, Ted, John and Amir were mentioned. Just noting this for future reference.Image
something else that I'm noticing in the less redacted documents: Kevin Clinesmith was much more prominent in Crossfire Hurricane operation than we previously realized.

In real time, Hans, myself and others had vehemently and savagely criticized Durham's useless plea agreement with Clinesmith that had failed to use their leverage over Clinesmith to obtain a road map of the Russiagate hoax operation. Compare for example Mueller's use of leverage over Rick Gates to interview him about 20 times, If anything, there was more leverage over Clinesmith.

Durham's failure to lever Clinesmith looks worse and worse as we now see Clinesmith's name in multiple Crossfire documents that had previously been redacted.

For example, here is Clinesmith on August 30, 2016 - early days of Russiagate hoax - approving the reporting of FBI surveillance of Trump and Flynn while they were supposedly providing a counterintelligence briefing.

In this briefing, they failed to give Trump and Flynn the same warning about Turkey that they had previously given Clinton's lawyers.Image
here's an example where the "declassified" Binder contains a redaction not made in the version published by Grassley almost five years ago. the name of Edward (Ted) Gistaro of ODNI Image
Read 19 tweets
Apr 12
The "Binder"

I've long predicted that the "Binder" would NOT be anything remotely approximating a comprehensive collection of documents pertaining to the Russia collusion hoax, but would be a re-hash of documents already available, very few of which shed any light on the FBI's role in the metastasis of a Clintonista campign dirty trick into the national flesh-eating disease that undermined and threatened to consume the first Trump administration.

To fully appreciate why the Binder is so uninformative, one needs to consider the circumstances of its construction - illustrated below by the insolent FBI response in Tab #14 (shown in the FOIA release at FBI vault vault.fbi.gov/crossfire-hurr…, but NOT in the present release.)

On December 22, 2020, in response to a request for "all FBI documents concerning contacts between those agencies and [Marc Elias, Michael Sussmann] or other lawyers from Perkins Coie", the FBI insolently stated that "the FBI is not able to search its holdings for 'Perkins Coie' without more information such as FBI custodians and a time period. If the Department of Justice is able to provide additional information, please contact the FBI Office of Congressional Affairs... Thank you".

This exchange shows that the compilation of the Binder was done late in the transition period after Trump had already lost the election and that the FBI was being uncooperative (to say the least) in responding to the request from an outgoing administration. Given the uncooperativeness of the FBI in regard to the Perkins Coie request, the base case has to be that it was uncooperative elsewhere.

This is indeed the case. Much of the Binder is recycled material already available (e.g. from HGSAC in December 2020) or already published by Solomon in early 2021.

Prior to its release, I published a projection of the contents of the Binder based on the considerable available information on its contents available at the FBI Vault and in litigation (see stephenmcintyre.substack.com/p/the-binder).

This projection was almost exactly correct.
Almost everything that I predicted to be in the Binder release was in the release with one major exception. The FBI Vault version of the binder included a heavily redacted version of the third renewal of the Carter Page FISA warrant. The new release not only doesn't contain an unredacted or lesser redacted version of this document, but omits it entirely.

Another interesting omission: the insolent FBI refusal of information regarding Perkins Coie which was part of the FBI Vault version of the dossier is omitted from the 2025 version.

In my prediction, I had observed that there were 815 pages in the Bates index of the FOIA Vault version, of which 569 pages were published (mostly highly redacted) in the Vault version and 246 pages withheld. There were two major withheld blocks in the Vault version (74 pages from Bates 150 to 223 and 94 pages from Bates 592 to 685.) These can now be identified as FBI administrative documents for Halper (new) and the (already available) 94-page FBI spreadsheet on Steele dossier "corroboration".

The new version has varying degrees of redaction. Here and there, there's a new detail from an unredaction. Conversely, there are occasional instances in which a previously unredacted detail is redacted.

The Binder originated with the 40 items listed by John Solomon - see below justthenews.com/accountability….

This will be a long thread correlating sections of the Binder to the Solomon requests and to previous versions, commenting in particular on redactions.

1.Documents showing all the requests made by Obama administration officials to unmask the overseas phone calls of Trump campaign, transition and family members from the beginning of the 2016 election through Inauguration Day 2017. These records have been declassified by Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe but have been awaiting Attorney General William Barr's permission for release, officials told Just the News.
2.The FBI interview reports of Igor Danchenko, the man identified as the primary sub-source for the Christopher Steele dossier, and any intelligence community documents raising concerns since 2008 that Danchenko had contacts with Russian intelligence.
3.Any and all documents gathered during the Justice Department inspector general's office interviews with Christopher Steele, including any notes or documents he turned over concerning his interactions with the FBI and any interview reports, synopses or transcripts.
4.All FBI 302 interview reports, confidential human source validation reports and CHS contact reports for Christopher Steele and Stefan Halper from May 2016 to December 2018.
5.All records showing whether and why Steele or Halper were ever discontinued as confidential human sources for the FBI and CIA.
6.All FBI text messages about the Russia investigation between former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, FBI attorney Lisa Page or agent Peter Strzok.
7.The 2018 classified report of referral from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence to the CIA concerning spy tradecraft failures in the Russia Intelligence Community Assessment.
8.The classified appendix to the DOJ inspector general's report on the FBI Mid-Year Exam investigation, which has been sought by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) for more than a year.
9.All threat assessment and risk assessment documents produced in connection with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review and approval of the Uranium One transaction to Rosatom's ArmZ subsidiary in 2010.
10. An FBI email chain from the early days of Crossfire Hurricane that was identified by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)
11.The final spreadsheet created by FBI analysts that assesses the accuracy and substantiation for all allegations contained in the Steele dossier.
12.The Defense Intelligence Agency documents concerning former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Russia requested by Grassley more than a year ago, including any records of a defensive briefing and tasking orders given to Flynn or debriefings provided by Flynn in connection with his attendance at a Russia Today dinner in Moscow in 2015.
13.All copies of FBI 302 reports created in connection with Flynn from December 2016 and January 2017
14.All emails, text messages and memos from January 2017 concerning discussions about the Flynn probe between former Comey, Priestap and McCabe.
15.All emails between Comey and former NSA Director Mike Rogers regarding involvement of the Steele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian interference in the 2016 election.
16.All FBI 302 interview reports of former Associate Attorney General Bruce Ohr and any evidence Ohr provided to the FBI or DOJ, including thumbdrives from his wife Nellie Ohr, in 2016 or 2017 concerning Russia or the Trump campaign.
17.All records of defensive briefings given in the 2015-16 election cycle to then-candidate Clinton or her campaign and any records of defensive briefings given to Trump or his campaign during the same time frame.
18.All records related to the State Department's July 26, 2016 meeting with an Australian government official concerning George Papadopoulos, Alexander Downer, Russia collusion, DNC hacking or related topics.
19.All records related to the State Department official providing that Australian government information to the FBI or any other member of the U.S. Intelligence Community from May 2016 to August 2016.
20.All State, CIA and FBI records related to the State Department and Australian government contacts between May 2016 and August 2016 concerning Papadopoulos, Downer, Russia collusion, DNC hacking or related topics.
21.All FBI records concerning Bill Priestap's trip to London in May 2016 and Peter Strzok's July 2016 trip to London.
22.All records related to Christopher Steele's contact with State Department officials, including Victoria Nuland, Kathleen Kavalec and Jonathan Winer.
23.All records related to meetings or communications between Glenn Simpson and any State Department, Justice Department, CIA or FBI official between April 2016 and July 2019.
24.All records from 2016 through 2017 related to communications between former Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott or any other employee of the Brookings Institution and any then-current State Department official about Christopher Steele or the Trump campaign.
25.All records from 2016 through 2017 related to communications between Sidney Blumenthal or Cody Shearer and the State Department, FBI, CIA or DOJ concerning matters related to Russia or the Trump campaign.
26.All intelligence reports and memos that Christopher Steele provided the State Department between 2013 and 2017.
27.Any FBI 302 interview reports in 2016 or 2017 with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
28.Any correspondence to or from the U.S. Embassy in London about the FBI sending any official or affiliated person to the United Kingdom to gather information about Trump campaign or Trump family associates.
29.All FBI 302 interview reports with former Senate Intelligence Security chief James Wolfe and any copies of documents he leaked to reporters, including 87 text messages transmitted to a reporter on one day in March 2017.
30.All FBI documents that describe the source of the leak of Michael Flynn's intercepted calls with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak or the source of the leak of the Carter Page FISA warrant.
31.All CIA and FBI documents concerning contacts between those agencies and Marc Elias, William Sussmann or other lawyers from Perkins Coie.
32.All FBI 302 reports of any interviews with former NSA Director Rogers concerning Russia and the Trump campaign/transition.
33.The unredacted version of a May 10, 2017 email from NSC staffer Eric Ciaramella and NSC Strategic Communications official William Kelly referenced in the Mueller report volume II and recently released as fully redacted to the Southeastern Legal Foundation.
34.All FBI 302 reports of interviews with professor Joseph Mifsud between January 2016 and September 2020.
35.All FBI, DOJ or CIA documents concerning the Party of Regions "black ledger" document discovered in 2016 in Ukraine, including any assessments about its accuracy, any interview reports and any analysis of handwriting.
36.All FBI and DOJ records of an August 2016 meeting with FBI officials, Bruce Ohr, Bruce Schwartz, and/or Andrew Weissman concerning Russia or Trump.
37.All FBI and DOJ records concerning an April 2017 meeting between editors and reporters of the Associated Press and FBI and DOJ officials, including Agent Karen Greenaway and DOJ prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.
38.The fully unredacted version of the fourth and final FISA warrant application targeting Carter Page.
39.The CIA communications in 2016 and 2017 to the FBI concerning Carter Page's relationship with the Agency and possible disinformation fed by Russia to Steele's dossier.
40.Any correspondence between the British national security advisor or his deputy during the transition in January 2017 to Michael Flynn or K. T. McFarland concerning the issue of Russia.Image
Nothing in Binder responsive to:
1. Documents showing all the requests made by Obama administration officials to unmask the overseas phone calls of Trump campaign, transition and family members from the beginning of the 2016 election through Inauguration Day 2017. These records have been declassified by Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe but have been awaiting Attorney General William Barr's permission for release, officials told Just the News.
Nothing in Binder responsive to "The FBI interview reports of Igor Danchenko, the man identified as the primary sub-source for the Christopher Steele dossier, and any intelligence community documents raising concerns since 2008 that Danchenko had contacts with Russian intelligence."

A redacted version of Danchenko January 2017 interview was published in July 2020 by Senate Judiciary Committee, but nothing is published on his subsequent interviews. At the time of Solomon's question, it wasn't known that Danchenko had been granted CHS status, a tactic which concealed Danchenko from scrutiny. At this time, the better request would be for all documents and correspondence pertaining to (1) the granting of CHS status to Danchenko; and (2) the internal reporting of Danchenko's information within the FBI.
Read 40 tweets
Feb 13
Climate United Fund, into which Biden EPA appears to have parked $6.97 billion, is a coalition of three 501(c)(3): Calvert Impact Capital, Community Preservation Corporation and Self-Help Credit Union.

The grant was originally announced by Kamala Harris youtube.com/watch?v=-NZqTJ…

Their EPA work plan here:
epa.gov/system/files/d…. Their work plan says that they have managed more than $30 billion in private and institutional capital.

I looked very quickly at the financial statements for each of the three participants.

Calvert Impact assets.ctfassets.net/4oaw9man1yeu/6… shows a 2023 balance sheet with $520 million in portfolio investments and $154 million in cash.

Calvert Impact streams money into a large number of smaller (mostly) non-profits, including for example Artspace boutique homes illustrated below.Image
Image
Community Preservation Corporation 2023 balance sheet shows $847 million invested in mortgage loans; cash and restricted cash of $342 million, $370 million invested in hedge funds, $101 million in unconsolidated subsidiaries for overall assets of $1.8 billion.

Self-Help Corporation has loans of $3.42 billion, with total assets of $4.49 billion.

All three participants are substantial 501(c)(3) corporations, all three are in the lending business. But their total is nowhere near the $30 billion mentioned in their application. I wonder where the $30 billion comes from.

The business to date of the three participants has been loans. Someone is going to benefit from the infusion of $6.97 billion into these three companies. How will that work? Maybe Kamala Harris can explain.Image
Image
Image
One-quarter of the Climate United Fund will be spent on "electric transportation" - a topic on which the leader of DOGE is well informed.

They propose "Electric and/or plug-in
hybrid electric passenger vehicles replacing existing ICE cars" - 25,000 – 35,000 passenger vehicles electrified. They also propose "Electric medium duty vans
and trucks replacing existing
ICE fleets" - 500-750 vehicles.

What isn't explained is why three Democrat 501(c)(3)'s have any useful role to play in the acquisition of electric vehicles by ICE? Surely that's something that ICA can administer themselves.

Similarly they propose "Electric heavy-duty trucks replacing diesel trucks" and "Electric school buses replacing diesel buses". Whatever the merits of the scheme, how do the 501(c)(3)'s add value?Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 2, 2024
Victoria Nuland was appointed to Board of Directors of National Endowment of Democracy, the primary US funding agency for overseas NGOs involved in Georgia, Ukraine and Syria.
One can scarcely help wondering what Nuland's input has been in connection with recent NGO activity in Georgia and Syria.
for people unfamiliar with Victoria Nuland, she has been mentioned dozens of times in previous threads here.
x.com/search?q=nulan…
reupping a link to Nuland's notorious conversation with US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt in early February 2014, while Maidan insurrection reaching crescendo in Ukraine (precisely as Putin and Russia preoccupied with Sochi Olympics). On February 22, 2014, Yats (Yatsenyuk) Nuland's choice was installed as Prime Minister; Oleh Tiahnybok, leader of the neo-Nazi party, was given a key role in post-coup government, while Klitschko remained mayor of Kyiv, a position that he retained. Precisely as Nuland and Pyatt agreed. Nuland said that Biden would be running point on the operation, which he did, becoming the de facto US regent in Ukraine from 2014-Jan 2017. Worth listening to again. 📷youtube.com/watch?v=WV9J6s…… Earlier CA link here x.com/ClimateAudit/s…
Read 4 tweets
Oct 24, 2024
Some readers have probably noticed that Microsoft has recently become one of the leading retailers of lurid allegations about "Russian influence operations targeting U.S. elections".

What is being overlooked is the lead author of the Microsoft articles is none other than Clint Watts, the founder (fpri.org/news/2017/08/f…) of the infamous Hamilton 68 dashboard, which was exposed by @mtaibbi in #TwitterFiles 15 (x.com/mtaibbi/status…) as the "next great media fraud".

Taibbi comprehensively exposed the total sham of the Hamilton 68 dashboard. Nonetheless, Clint Watts, the main proponent of the sham Hamilton 68 dashboard, has risen to a more lucrative and more prominent platform at Microsoft, where he continues to propagate the same warmonging claims as he has for more than a decade.Image
Image
Image
Image
less well known is that Watts also had a curious role in the original Russiagate hoax. Christopher Steele had met Kathleen Kavalec, a senior State Department official on October 11, 2016, where he spun an even more lurid fantasy than the "dossier" itself, adding in Sussmann's false Alfa Bank hoax and naming Millian as a supposed source (notwithstanding his supposed reluctance to identify sources because of "danger".) Kavalec later met with Bruce Ohr, who became Steele's conduit to FBI after November 1, 2016.
Kavalec read Watts' lurid November 6, 2016 article entitled "Trolling for Trump" and, after meeting with Ohr et al on Nov 21, 2016, called Watts in for a meeting on December 7, 2016. warontherocks.com/2016/11/trolli…
Kavalec was so impressed with Watts that she sent a copy of "Trolling for Trump" to Victoria Nuland and other high-level State Department officials including Daniel Fried, John Heffern, Athena Katsoulos, Naz Durakoglu, Jonathan Cohen, Bridget Brink, Eric Green, Christopher Robinson, Conrad Tribble. Earlier in 2016, Brink and Nuland had been involved in the Biden/State Department putsch to remove Shokin as Ukrainian Prosecutor General.Image
Image
Clint Watts' "Trolling for Trump" article warontherocks.com/2016/11/trolli…, which had so enthralled senior State Department official Kavalec and her associates, said that their interest in "trolls" had arisen as follows: "When experts published content criticizing the Russian-supported Bashar al Assad regime, organized hordes of trolls would appear to attack the authors on Twitter and Facebook."

So who were the "experts" whose feelings had been hurt by online criticism? It turned out to be January 2014 article foreignaffairs.com/articles/syria… co-authored by Watts himself entitled "The Good and Bad of Ahrar al-Sham: An al Qaeda–Linked Group Worth Befriending."

At the time of Watts' article, ISIS was still very new. It was written in the same month as Obama had called ISIS the "jayvee". At the time, U.S. (through separate CIA and DoD operations) and Gulf States allies were funneling cash and weapons to jihadis of every persuasion as the Obama administration attempted to implement its regime change coup in Syria.

But despite Beltway support for arming Al Qaeda and its allies (including Ahrar al-Sham as advocated by Clint Watts), the larger public has never entirely understood the higher purpose supposedly served by arming Al Qaeda and its allies to carry out regime change in Syria. Mostly, they find it hard to believe that U.S. would carry out such an iniquitous policy. So Watts ought to have expected some blowback to his advocacy of arming AlQaeda allies, but instead, Watts blamed "Russia" for online criticism, ultimately falsely accusing simple opponents of US allying with AlQaeda allies as Russian agents or dupes.Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
actually, the lesson from Helene is the opposite from that being promoted.

In 1933, the Tennessee Valley Authority was given the mandate for flood control in the valley of the Tennessee River and its tributaries. Over the next 40 years, they built 49 dams, which, for the most part, accomplished their goal. Whereas floods in the Tennessee were once catastrophic, younger people are mostly unaware of them.

The French Broad River (Asheville) is an upstream tributary where flood control dams weren't constructed due to local opposition.

Rather than the devastation of Hurricane Helene on Asheville illustrating the effect of climate change, the success of the flood control dams in other sectors of the Tennessee Valley illustrates the success of the TVA flood control program where it is implemented.

Hurricane Helene did not show the effect of climate change, but what happens to settlements in Tennessee Valley tributaries under "natural" flooding (i.e. where flood control dams have been rejected.)
I should add that, in its first 40 years, the TVA built 49 flood control dams, of which 29 were power-generating. In the subsequent 50 years, TVA built 0 flood control dams,
However, in the 1980s, they established the Carbon Dioxide Information Centre (CDIAC) under their nuclear division, which sponsored much influential climate research, including the CRU temperature data (Phil Jones) and Michael Mann's fellowship from which Mann et al 1998 derived.
In 1990, the parents of Crowdstrike's Dmitri Alperovich moved from Russia to Chattanooga, Tennessee, where his father was a TVA nuclear engineer. Dmitri moved to Tennessee a few years later.
One can't help but wonder whether TVA's original mandate for flood control got lost in the executive offices, attracted by more glamorous issues, such as climate change research.
If so, one could reasonably say that a factor in the seeming abandonment of TVA efforts to complete its original flood control mandate (e.g. to French Broad River which inundated Asheville) was partly attributable to diversion of TVA interest to climate change research, as opposed to its mandate of flood control.
another thought. As soon as the point is made, it is obvious that flood control dams have reduced flooding. Not just in Appalachia. I've looked at long data for water levels in Great Lakes and the amount of fluctuation (flooding) after dams installed is much reduced.
And yet my recollection of public reporting of climate is that weather extremes, including flooding, is getting worse. But in areas with flood control dams, it obviously //isn't// getting worse than before. It's better. Note to self: check IPCC reports for their specific findings on flooding.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(