My take on the back and forth about the advanced child tax credits is that, as it was proposed in the AFA, where payments are only sent if your tax liability is negative, it seems likely to lead to administrative problems. 1/?
peoplespolicyproject.org/2021/01/20/why…
But if we did actually copy Canada and assess eligibility entirely based on prior year income, & send checks out to everyone below the high phase-out, that would be fine. It’s not ideal because it’s less responsive to income changes, but administratively it’d avoid major fumbles
In Canada, 6% of people on last-ditch social assistance do not receive the full child benefit because it’s based on prior income. This isn’t great, & may be worse in the US where our social assistance is worse, but it’s a relatively small number of people jrf.org.uk/file/36835/dow…
Making it universal is better policy for a number of reasons, and would eliminate that exclusion error without causing over/underpayment issues, but since that isn’t on the table, allowing for some imprecision is worth it to keep administration simple. We should copy Canada

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Medlock

James Medlock Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jdcmedlock

18 Jan
The UK provides an instructive example of the administrative challenges of distributing means-tested tax credit benefits on a monthly basis. In 2003 they implemented a big Child Tax Credit and Working Tax Credit. The design is in many ways similar to current US proposals
Immediately, they ran into major overpayment problems. About 1/3rd of all benefits were overpaid, and there were reports of confusion and hardship as people had to pay back welfare debt at the end of the year
Policymakers admitted that they were blindsided by how many changes in circumstance people had over the year
Read 6 tweets
14 Jan
No one should be in poverty simply because they have kids! Great report out today from PPP on designing a universal child benefit.
peoplespolicyproject.org/2021/01/14/now…
Current child tax credits are designed to exclude the bottom 10% of tax units, and partially exclude even more. Image
The current tax credit regime reduces poverty a lot on paper, but this is in part due to gaming the head count poverty metric. Giving a lot of money to people right around the cutoff, while none to people in deep poverty, creates a misleading picture of effectiveness Image
Read 5 tweets
27 Dec 20
My (not particularly hot) takes:

The left has a tendency towards negativity, which 9 times out of 10 leads to the correct analysis, but also leads to missing real successes like expanded UI
That’s how you could have people calling CARES the “worst bill in 25 years”. It also reflects a general lack of focus on cash welfare on some portions of the left
When it comes to actual politicians, I think they may have been cautious about bragging about the UI generosity for fear of raising the issue of essential workers getting paid less than unemployed people. And the implementation problems also made it hard to brag about
Read 5 tweets
8 Dec 20
After Covid, we should have a medical debt jubilee
Crazy stat: a majority of the civil arrests in eastern Idaho are over medical debt eastidahonews.com/2019/05/why-so…
27 year olds are the most likely age group to have medical debt, likely in part because that's the year people are removed from their parents health insurance healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.137…
Read 4 tweets
7 Dec 20
Dec 15th is the deadline to enroll in ACA plans (later in many states)

If you make between 100-200% of the federal poverty line, you're probably best off with a Silver plan

Between 200-400%, you're probably best off with a Gold or Bronze

Above 400%, Bronze is likely best
In the 100-200% range ($12,760-$25,520 for an individual, $26,200-$52,400 for a family of four), you get Cost Sharing Reduction payments. You probably qualify for a free Bronze plan, but silver will most likely be a better deal healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.13…
From 200-400% FPL (up to $51,040 for an individual, $104,800 for a family of four), you're probably better off with a Bronze plan, but there's a chance that silver loading has made Gold plans particularly cheap (sometimes less than Silver), in which case it's probably worth it
Read 9 tweets
24 Nov 20
Good. If the left has any leverage on staffing, it should be used against Bruce “end welfare as we know it” Reed
He was a key architect of welfare reform, and he said as recently as 2016 that he still thought it was a success. In 2004 he bragged about how he had outflanked the GOP on support for work requirements
This is the most bizarre contrarianism
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!