On the subject of Trumpy moments, the one that still burns in my chest like an undigested lump of gristle is Christine Blasey Ford testifying at Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing. I can still bring tears of frustration & fury to my eyes thinking about it.
More than any other episode, that one reinforced to me that the right & I are literally experiencing different worlds. The differences are way deeper than ideology or policy -- gut-level, brain-stem deep.
I've never really written about it because even now I feel like I lack the words. It's just, I know that guy, Kavanaugh. I've known guys like that my whole life. Blithe & entitled, winy & aggrieved, outraged at the very thought of accountability. "I like beer & chicks, hur hur."
And even moreso, I know that woman, Ford. The kind of woman who has been dealing with handsy white-guy mediocrities her whole life, who has responded by throwing herself into the work, dotting the i's & crossing the t's, meeting the benchmarks, being so conscientious ...
... because, in a world run by men, the quality of her own work is the only thing she can control. Watching that woman dragged before a panel of white Senate men who *literally needed a female interlocutor to communicate with her*. Watching her risk her reputation & life ...
... on the hope that truth & accountability might matter, that it's worth trying. And then she found out, in the most brutal terms, no, they still don't matter. Even at the very top, it's a boy's club & they favor the beer-drinking bro.
I dunno, I could go on about it forever & never capture it. It was just such a perfect clash of archetypes. And millions of men -- men I know & love! -- just instantly, unreflectively sided with him. I don't think anything in the Trump years depressed me more, for longer .
I won't rant forever, just adding: when I watched Kavanaugh & Ford, I thought, "what if I were a hiring manager at a company & they were applicants?" You know the Kavanaugh guy will be an abrasive dick who interrupts & expects undue credit & makes his employees miserable w/ ego.
And you know Ford will do good work (even though she won't brag or demand credit). She'll be a team player, get along w/ everyone, & probably do thoughtful shit like bringing co-workers cupcakes on their birthdays.
Of COURSE, if you're a practical person who cares about performance, you hire the Ford. Yet somehow when it comes to leadership, to the highest & most important work, we choose toxic masculinity. We choose assholes we wouldn't hire to do our f'ing taxes!
And, very predictably, they perform horribly! They're dumb & abrasive & unimaginitive & they blame everyone else for their failures. It's all so obvious, and yet there it was, a distilled morality play about the whole thing, and it showed that nothing has changed. Uuuugh.
If I had to boil my entire goddamn political worldview down to one line, it would be about getting Kavanaughs out of positions of power and Fords into them.
Now I've worked myself up all over again & gotta go walk the dog to chill out. </fin>
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Coal miners do not vote based on a rational assessment of their personal material best interests any more than other voters do. They are immersed in a deep culture war just like everyone else. "If you do the math, our bailout plan is better for you" is just so naive.
I always get yelled at when I say this, but I feel masochistic today, so:
I obviously see the *political* point of concentrating resources on coal communities to help them transition. But as a pure political or moral matter, why should those communities matter *more* ...
... than any number of other communities or professions that are disrupted by the evolution of the economy? Capitalism brings "creative destruction." ALL vulnerable people deserve some protection from it. Why coal communities *in particular*?
You've really got to read the 1776 report, not just summaries. The writing is so much worse than you think. It's like some twisted kind of performance art: how many plodding, pedestrian, ham-handed cliches can you pile atop one another? whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
The authoritarian mind is so plain, so utterly without aesthetic spark. It's not funny, or curious, or empathetic, or piercing. It is utterly blind to irony & contingency. There's a reason anyone who creates anything-- writers, artists, scholars, entrepreneurs --is a Dem now.
Over the last 5 years, I have walked hundreds of miles with my dogs. In the process, I've become something of an anthropologist, studying the habits of humans out walking. One observation: people really don't know how to be passed gracefully. Human nature? Bad socialization? 🤷♂️
My dogs & I walk very fast, so we're constantly passing people. It tends to be a little awkward -- you're going the same direction, maybe you both have curious dogs, you're not sure whether to say some kind of greeting, it seems to take forever. No one really likes it.
Given that no one likes it, you'd think people would take some obvious steps to minimize it. Instead, people quite often behave in such a way as to *maximize* it. They look over their shoulder, get nervous, speed up, & just make the whole thing take longer.
Good thread. I don't think we really reckon enough with the fact -- as supported by the vast bulk of the research -- that "deprogramming" cult members is a labor-intensive, individualized affair. There's just no way to do it at scale.
That means we've basically lost a generation of older white Americans, to say nothing of the younger people (especially suburban women) being pulled into this shit today. Some individuals can be saved, but there's no lever we can pull to bring them all back. They're mostly gone.
Two big implications: one, we'll be dealing with these folks & their distorting effects on politics for the rest of our lives. This is not a "solve" thing, it's a "manage" thing. Second, the top imperative must be cutting off the production of new cultists.