1/ Is your board becoming unwieldy as you scale past Series B?
That's probably because you're trying to fit too much into the same format. Some ideas on how to solve that.
2/ Problems: you don't know who to invite. Exec team benefits from being involved but investors hesitate to be direct. A number of issues can't be discussed openly. Engagement isn't great and it all feels a bit theatrical. Takes too long to prep and most comments are generic.
3/ Diagnostic: you're running too many meetings as one. In a COVID world with everyone in remote locations, there's no need for that. Break it up!
4/ Cat A: Reporting - becomes a monthly activity, asynchronous in nature, with a robust set of KPIs supported by well-understood definitions, management accounts, a real time Metabase or Google Studio dashboard if you have it. Perhaps a quick commentary, Amazon memo style.
5/ Cat B. The Board Meeting. It's a BOARD meeting - so discuss board matters. Hiring, firing, financing, acquisitions, ESOP, big thorny problems that you need to be able to explore freely. Length: 60-90minutes. Freq: bi-monthly. Ad hoc if urgent.
6/ Cat C. THEMES. Deep dive into specific aspects of the business or big strategic questions. By all means invite all of your exec team. Board members participate if they feel strongly about the topic and have something to add. Context is clear - brainstorm, explore, decide.
7/ In other words, break open the set of activities where you want your investors engaged - "right tool for the right job". Reduce the amount of prep required by making stuff automated and packaged. Be brutally clear about your objectives and what you want to achieve. Voila.
8/ Less overhead, less confusion, better engagement, better decisions. You're welcome 🥸.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ By definition, VC partnership are only as good a their decision making.
Let’s explore 👇
2/ In venture as in startups, there are only decisions, never any certainties. It is the nature of our game that good decisions combined with good execution can lead to poor outcomes. In other words, a poor outcome does not mean you took the wrong decision. What to do?
3/ The first step is to collectively get as close to the truth as you can.
This means gathering opinions and facts until you have built a mental model of the decision you are taking and assessing the nature of the risks you are taking.
Numbers you committed to your board are not your strategy.
Numbers you think next round investors want to see are not your strategy.
2/ You produce objectives because it's good to have measurable targets, usually ambitious ones. You know it's really hard to forecast so early ... but suddenly your fairly random attempt at predicting the future because the yardstick against which you are measured.
3/ Once these numbers are communicated to the board and across the company, these become the goal everyone is working towards. This many paying customers, suppliers on the platform, whatever the KPI may be.
Your wise investors tell you "disciplined companies hit their numbers"!
1/ Let me distill the Stride investment strategy in fifteen tweets. Yes, fifteen 😘.
2/ To be able to make money, you need some form of edge. The edge does not need to be complex of over-intellectualised, but it needs to be real and drive returns.
3/ Some funds are vertical specialists (say @anthemis ), some leverage network assets (say @ycombinator ) or build large portfolios (say @seedcamp), some funds leverage dominant execution capability (say @sequoia or @IndexVentures ) etc.