Many believe that intelligence is inherently fixed and that studying is unlikely to make a dramatic difference
However, there is research to suggest that academic ability is greatly enhanced when students adopt a #growthmindset (1/9)
Coined by Carol Dweck, the term refers to the belief that intelligence is malleable, and that ability is dramatically increased through hard work and practice
Those who adopt such a mindset see mistakes as opportunities to improve, rather than failures (2/9)
J. Magels found that students who believed that intelligence is fixed (entity theorists) were more vulnerable to decreased performance when challenged
Those who believed that intelligence is acquirable (incremental theorists) were better able to remain effective learners
(3/9)
In their study, students were given a general knowledge test, and were then retested on the questions they got wrong
Despite similar initial performances, incremental theorists demonstrated significantly greater improvement the second time around than entity theorists (4/9)
Not only can teaching a growth mindset nurture more resilient and engaged learners, but Dweck believes that it can go a long way in eradicating inequality... (5/9)
She cites a fourth grade class in the South Bronx, New York.
In 1 year, it went from performing poorly to the number one fourth grade class in the entire state (in a state-wide math test)
‘This happened because the meaning of effort and difficulty were transformed’ (6/9)
So, how can we teach a growth mindset?
Dweck suggests that praising children for their effort, rather than their attainment can help (7/9)
Many believe that there are different types of learners
I.e. some people learn more effectively from visual material, some from auditory material and others from kinaesthetic practice
Therefore, instruction should be tailored to each learner’s preferred style (1/11)
Paul Howard-Jones (2014) suggested that this assumption is based on the fact that different regions of the cortex have different roles in visual, auditory, and sensory processing, so students should learn differently “according to which part of their brain works better” (2/11)