Alina Chan Profile picture
21 Jan, 9 tweets, 3 min read
I know twitter is not a safe place. But we need to do something about the harassment of women- especially the few women experts who have the courage to weigh in on challenging topics.

I know this is "old news" but it needs to be raised again and again...
amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
Disagreeing with someone is not justification for harassing them. You're not -entitled- to their endorsement or even their attention.

I've seen things that I don't believe would've been said to me if I was a man.
Sometimes harassment doesn't stay within @Twitter. Harassers can bring it to other spaces. That's where a line is definitely crossed.

If a harasser gets so used to abusing someone on twitter that they bring it to a work or social meeting.

It's not -just- harassment on twitter.
For the people who've gotten too comfortable with harassing women on twitter, I want you to imagine each woman you're pestering as instead the most manly man you know. And think about whether you would say the same kinds of things, make the same kinds of demands to them.
Would you harass Clint Eastwood for ignoring you?
Would you pester Chuck Norris to tweet about you?
Would you complain to everyone that the Rock isn't being appreciative of your ideas?
Would you tell everyone that Idris is being unfair to you because he won't acknowledge you on twitter?
Would you attack Muhammad Ali for not giving you the time of day?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alina Chan

Alina Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ayjchan

23 Jan
Seriously ☄️ reporting by ⁦@TheJohnSudworth
“if you line up side-by-side the WHO's Terms of Reference with the Shi Zhengli Science article.. it is clear that the overarching strategic narrative is that the origin of the virus is outside of China." bbc.com/news/world-asi…
@BBC reporting from Wuhan: “Instead of publishing its own evidence.. China appears to be taking an anywhere-but-Wuhan approach, with state media cheerleading the idea that the virus may have arrived in Wuhan on frozen food imports or talking cryptically of ‘multiple origins’”
The idea of multiple origins- that sars2 somehow emerged simultaneously in multiple countries around the world in 2019 - is mind bending.

A pandemic pathogen emerging in humans is already rare. Not to mention the same virus emerging in different places around🌏 at the same time.
Read 5 tweets
22 Jan
Journalists have been asking what it's like to propose lab origins hypothesis & consistently present the circumstantial evidence for it.

I thought about this and think the analogy of the boy who cried wolf is the best way to explain it to non-scientists.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy_W…
The story: "a shepherd boy who repeatedly tricks nearby villagers into thinking a wolf is attacking his town's flock. When a wolf actually does appear and the boy again calls for help, the villagers believe that it is another false alarm and the sheep are eaten by the wolf."
At the very beginning of this pandemic, there were people who cried wolf. These included scientists who said that it could be possible that SARS-CoV-2 had come from a lab.
sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/m…

world-class.simplecast.com/episodes/what-…

img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02…
Read 14 tweets
22 Jan
Can we stop with the new viruses for a bit?

Chinese gov “has not said how widely used illicit vaccines are or who has produced them. But a "vast amount" of pigs in China have nonetheless been vaccinated... a sentiment echoed by many other experts.” reuters.com/article/us-chi…
Story speaks to how much biotech has progressed. Based on just a sequence, hundreds, maybe even thousands of labs around the world can now synthesize any pathogen with good or bad intent. You can’t tell which lab made these illicit swine flu vaccines unless you ask the farmers.
And I just heard this isn’t a country specific mindset.

“an intervention could involve treating the entire animal reservoir to reduce viral load using tools such as anti-virals, vaccines, and interfering particles.”

No live vaccines for 🦇 please!

darpa.mil/news-events/20…
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
Possibly the most comprehensive article to date on the origins of covid-19 - whether it arose naturally or possibly from lab/research activities, written by @dctrjack @CNET cnet.com/features/the-h…
Another article from back in Sep 2020 to read for more details about RaTG13 (closest related virus genome to SARS2), inconsistencies in how it was reported by the WIV, and an inaccessible pathogen database at the WIV. minervanett.no/alina-chan-cor…
💫article from May 2020 to understand how common lab accidents are, even at world class facilities, regardless of country.

".. 80% chance of an escape every 12.8 years. And that was in 2012, when such work was far less commonplace than it is now."
motherjones.com/politics/2020/…
Read 15 tweets
19 Jan
Worth listening for couple of minutes on new data concerning South African SARS2 variant 20H/501Y.V2 (B.1.351).

Seems that only first wave patients with severe covid, robust response to virus had neutralizing antibodies. But still unclear how lab results translate to real world.
Also, without being able to directly see the data, unclear whether the same patient serum samples could also neutralize the original SARS2 variant or other currently circulating variants.
As of Jan 15, 2021 (sequences deposited into @GISAID), these are the 14 countries where the South African 501Y.V2 variants have been detected.

Visualized on covidcg.org @CovidCg cumulative number of sequences in the B.1.351 lineage by country, over time (by week).
Read 6 tweets
19 Jan
A few people sending this to me and asking if this is a smoking gun. It isn’t.

WIV’s publications+EcoHealth grants (and Daszak’s tweets) have said as much. Problem is that all of the closest virus genomes to SARS2, eg RaTG13, GD/GX pangolin, RmYN02, only made public post-covid.
Yes, near the end, Daszak speculates you could make a vaccine that works against diverse sars viruses by making a chimeric sars virus (made of parts of different sars viruses). But I don’t think this would’ve been sars2- it doesn’t seem to elicit good antibodies against sars1.
It would be nice if EcoHealth could release all unpublished information they received from WIV while they were subcontracting work from the 5+ year NIH grants to them. What type of research, exactly, had been started/planned but not published?
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!