SlateStarCodex is back! Scott left his day job to run his own private practice so he doesn't need to preserve anonymity, and the private practice will be a one-man attempt to fix cost disease in medicine.
I've seen psychiatrists for depression, anxiety, and anorexia. Normally in the Bay Area intake is $300, sessions are $200, practitioners who take insurance are hard to come by and the copays are still steep.
Scott's new practice is $35/month. That's it. He's not taking new patients at this time, so this isn't an ad to go sign up for him as your doctor, but I really really hope he's able to make this work - and that others follow.
1) I'm 26. 2) My soon-to-be-wife is 27. 3) It's pretty fucking infantilizing to suggest that there's something weird about me conducting interviews with other professionals in the course of my job being a reporter. But more importantly...
One of the main points I'm making, here, is that 'I want a lot of kids' has somehow become one of the most provocative statements you can make as a progressive person of my generation. This is the first time I have literally been called a fascist for it, but the anger isn't new.
People have surrendered the idea 'it's okay to want large families' to religious conservatives to the point where they'll tell you you're a "tradwife" for believing it. Any way you want to live your life is okay - unless you want a lot of kids, in which case it's disgusting.
Wild polio was eradicated in Africa (yay!) and I learned this morning that many people are unaware that the polio eradication program was devastated in 2011 by the Obama administration using a vaccine trial for the operation against Osama Bin Laden. vox.com/future-perfect…
The government suspected that Bin Laden was hiding in a compound in Pakistan. Among other ways to try to verify his identity, they wanted DNA samples from children in the compound. They conducted a 'vaccination campaign' during which they'd try to get the samples (this failed).
They claimed to be vaccinating kids for hepatitis, but that vaccine requires several shots, spaced a month apart, and they didn't bother with the followup shots in the poor neighborhood where they started because they had moved on to Bin Laden's area, cover established.
As a teenager, I idolized Scott Alexander of SlateStarCodex, who wrote deep, compassionate and fascinating stuff about politics, history, medicine, AI, charitable giving, depression and anxiety, rationality, language and how we think about the world. As an adult, I met him.
I am here to tell you that he writes such a good blog because he is a thoroughly good human being. He is careful, cautious, sincere, witty, and brings out those traits in the people around him; I've never had a conversation with him that I didn't walk away from feeling smarter.
I have known him to volunteer huge chunks of the time he doesn't spend on his job and his blog to help my uninsured friends navigate the medical system, to help my unhoused friends access housing, to help me double-check a lit review I wanted to be very sure of, to review books,
According to this cubic model of the coronavirus pandemic, the dead will walk again starting on Sunday. By the end of the summer all the people who have ever lived will have returned to us. I know it's surprising but the fit is *excellent*.
making America great again
credit to my friend Celestia, I made the joke without the chart and she had the perfect chart for it
The SF Bay Area could open this week if we'd done enough to scale up testing over the last six weeks. The economic damage of the last six weeks was unavoidable, but the damage going forward is avoidable; we could have made the pivot out of stay-home happen faster.
California's testing is still mediocre compared to other states. It doesn't have to be. We have lots of biotech and lots of private and public resources.
California is behind other states on setting up contact-tracing teams, even though the Bay has few enough cases that contact tracing is probably viable right now.
It's weird that "I'm personally willing to accept a 1-2% risk of death to reopen the country" is such a common talking point. If somehow the only cost of reopening the country were a 1-2% risk of me personally dying, I'd be in favor of it too, obviously.
I am personally unwilling to accept a million people dying to reopen the country. The thing that happens if we go back to uncontrolled exponential spread is a 1-2% chance of you dying (depending on demographics) AND a guarantee of ~ a million people dying.
Also, of course, we can't 'reopen the country' because people do not want to die and so they will not resume ordinary economic activities on large scales until they're reassured those activities are safe, etc etc etc.