Absolutely shocking that @nytimes fired Lauren Wolfe for her tweet when Thomas Friedman and Bret Stephenson together have fallen on their faces countless times all over their pages; forget about Twitter. Really shocking gender bias, caving to bad faith criticism and just cruelty.
Lauren did not deserve to lose her job because a mob of right-wing trolls and Glenn Greenwald rightly bet that a woman showing vulnerability while witnessing an historic event would be a popular target for partisan scorn and draw disdain from employers. Very sad to see this.
P.S. if she were a man none of this would be happening, and I will block any man who tries to argue with me about this. Just accept that you don't know anything about being a woman in the media and think before you @
For more on being a woman in journalism, here's a rant I wrote, inspired by Lauren. There is a culture in the media that, mostly without any self-awareness at all, is deeply unfair to women. It's long past due for a reckoning of this matter, in my book.
P.S. the media is far from the only industry that has this issue. Ask the women who lost 140,000 jobs during the pandemic, while men gained 16,000. The statistics are clear, the problem is real, and it's time to address it. edition.cnn.com/2021/01/08/eco…
omg I just realized I called him Bret Stephenson 😂

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sulome

Sulome Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SulomeAnderson

25 Jan
Really want to stress that cancelling your @nytimes subscriptions is not the solution. Consuming--and funding--less good journalism is not the answer. Being rigorous consumers of the news who hold sources of it accountable from a place of informed engagement is a better approach.
The reason I am telling you not to cancel your Times subscription is because there are places in the world where indescribable things happen to human beings, and the industry is in freefall, so most journalism there is really only being done by NYT and a handful of other outlets.
If enough of you cancel your Times subscriptions, there is even less money and space to tell important stories from overseas, and interrupt America from our constant navel-gazing. I just don't think that can be a good thing until we figure out better ways to tell those stories.
Read 4 tweets
23 Jan
Literally nothing makes me angrier than institutionalized, unacknowledged sexism. I'm indescribably tired of being implicitly held to different standards because of my gender. I'm tired of watching less talented/qualified men be taken seriously when I have to fight so hard to be.
I'm tired of the army of male trolls waiting to leap on my every typo or error/correction, twist it beyond recognition and hold it up to the public as evidence that I'm not good at my job/crazy/not very bright. I'm tired of men in this industry being so quick to believe them.
I'm tired of watching my female friends in the media be torn apart and shunned for things men do with literally no consequence whatsoever. I'm tired of being treated differently, I'm tired of having to explain myself all the time, I'm tired of working so hard to prove my worth.
Read 4 tweets
23 Jan
I don't know who needs to hear this, but traditional media just failed us hugely. Journalists with no real stake in the damage being done insisted on reporting down to the partisan rabble. Their inability to deviate from convention normalized a situation that was entirely insane.
The solution is not to do away with standards of objectivity in journalism. Taking a step back and coolly examining a subject from all angles is important. Fighting bias in your reporting is crucial. That doesn't mean you should get fired for expressing an opinion on Twitter.
ALL JOURNALISTS HAVE OPINIONS. We're not robots! But as an example, anyone who follows me here knows I have lots of opinions. But I've been trained to put my opinions aside when I report. I still have them, I can express them on my own time, but they don't belong in my journalism
Read 6 tweets
21 Jan
I have never said this in public, because I haven't wanted to burn those bridges. I just dc anymore. If journalism doesn't work out, I will survive.

The way editors (95% men) have treated me has taken a high toll on my self-esteem and mental health.

That's it. That's the tweet.
It sucks to work hard and do things you're proud of and still be consistently treated as completely disposable in a profession with no protective industry standards. I know they do it to a lot of other freelancers, also men. I know gender is not the only factor. It just compounds
Anyway I came to the realization of late that I won't allow myself to be treated like that anymore, and if it means not doing this job, then I would rather not do it and not feel broken and insecure all the time about what I do.

Still letting this marinate. Anyway that felt good
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
Yet another thread about white supremacist terrorism--which again, is very clearly what we are dealing with. Not just according to me, but law enforcement. So I am going to do a little explainer about what these people want and where their skinheads are at right now.
To start with, I'm not talking about the “armed protesters.” There is overlap but not all goobers with giant guns are like this. The most violent white supremacist terrorists, though, are a lot like AQ or ISIS. Again, some actively nurture that connection.
We know they have been actively training and recruiting current/former military and law enforcement for years. Many attempted serious terror attacks that thankfully were prevented, like this one by a Coast Guard officer who made a kill list of Democrats. bbc.com/news/world-us-…
Read 9 tweets
18 Jan
Ok fellow journalists. I know some of you dislike me (I’m actually nice) but I hope you will see why this is important. A thread on what to watch for re: domestic terrorism while covering anything like 1/6. This is offered with the best of intentions, and in the public interest.
1. Please familiarize yourself with the most violent white supremacist terrorist groups and their symbols/insignia. Much imagery in the latter is not immediately recognizable as terroristic or Nazi in nature to anyone who isn’t already aware of the connection, so research now.
Here’s a @FightExtremism list of the most virulent white supremacist groups in the U.S. Pay particular attention to Atomwaffen, The Base and any affiliates. Those are the most violent groups and known to be actively recruiting military and law enforcement. counterextremism.com/press/white-su…
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!