I didn't know it then, but the New Zealand I was a child in was a closed economy, shuttered behind all sorts of barriers, based in geography and trade law.
Through my remembered eyes, there was much good about it. For example, there was a huge domestic craft pottery industry, whose wares were used across all social classes, who were almost all wiped out by cheap Japanese imports when trade barriers came down.
Almost all, except for a few who displayed the stubbornness that is the mark of a true New Zealander. Like this man whose modest domestic ware has now come back into fashion but we use at home because it's nice to eat off plates made by human hand. paulmelser.co.nz/pottery/
I guess my question is, as we move, perhaps through ineptitude and ideology, to an economy like the New Zealand's of my youth, and it becomes harder for importers to the UK and exporters from it, might we see a revival of domestic cottage industry here?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
*Repeats plea ad infinitum for @barstandards to be permitted to prioritise the regulatory objective of protecting and promoting the public interest.*
I make this point, as always I do, in the context of a political opponent being threatened with @barstandards referral for words or actions of theirs I find reprehensible but the principal control mechanism for which rests elsewhere in the law.*
The fact of @barstandards being asked to enter the political sphere can carry an implied criticism should it fail then to do so. That criticism can weaken its ability to perform the regulatory function which only it can perform of protecting against bad barristering.
Remember Andrew Mills? Liz Truss advisor, architect of the VIP lane red carpet to riches Ayanda deal which involved the NHS blowing £155m on unusable facemasks?
We explained in this thread how the deal involved us paying up to £166m over and above the prices we were paying to other mask suppliers (which of course themselves embedded huge profits).
Remember Tim Horlick, owner of Ayanda, saying "I am not at liberty to disclose" how much profit he was making "but it will be in our accounts in due course"?
(Of course he is "at liberty to disclose" it. He just doesn't want to.)
I'm more interested in who will save our country from corrupt politics.
Good distraction though.👆
Robert Jenrick’s constituency was awarded funding by his department as part of a process that was opaque and not impartial. thetimes.co.uk/article/robert…
A genuinely fascinating interview with a man who managed to rise to Attorney General despite the profound handicaps in our politics of modesty and thoughtfulness. instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-refl…
Interesting - for me at least - to read him struggle with a question I also do: about the analytical content of the role and responsible limits of criticism of judges.
Embedded in the (now) orthodox belief that judicial diversity is a good thing is the assumption that judges bring who they are to what they do. If this is true (and imo it is) it must follow that it can be right to ask whether who a judge is has wrongly infected their reasoning.
Just been sent a screenshot by a contact in the PPE world offering him IIR facemasks at $0.039. The 150m masks we purchased from Liz Truss' adviser via Ayanda for £97.5m we could buy today for £4.5m.
What makes this even more obscene is that the Ayanda contract had this clause in it - a clause I believe to be unique to politically connected VIP lane Ayanda - which said Ayanda could deliver its IIR facemasks late.
Here's what the National Audit Office said about how much PPE the Government bought at those top of the market prices: five years worth.
In its Manifesto for the 2019 General Election, the Conservative Party promised to "raise standards in... workers' rights." And now we learn they plan to cut them.