exiledjargon.blogspot.com/2020/04/the-co…
This is a great extended essay I was sent by (also written by) @Jargon_0 on the history of right populism in the last 150 or so years of American history. I have always been conflicted in trying to understand the history of conservative/rightist politics
(I use these terms as a stand in for the the healthier aspects of American political life, they dont always necessarily match with traditional poly sci definitions of these things). For example, in my lectures as a student teacher in grad school on the history of the conservative
movement, I presented it as essentially a material issue. Earlier conservative politics were funded by more domestic, even regional business types(think of extractive resource based industries) and the inclusion of more high finance types in the 70's and 80's changed the
nature and priorities of conservative politics. However, from purely an ideological and political perspective, I think @Jargon_0 comes much closer to understanding how our political priorities became warped in the cold war. I highly suggest looking at this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It depends on the specific book/academic you are talking about. In the case of Nazis, it has alot to do with that. There was more of an openness to asses the Italian fascists accurately. But Arendts work and the work of Adorno and others completely enveloped initial studies of
Nazism. It has changed in recent years though. Although, off top of my head, I cant think of any studies that demonstrate an openess to look at Nazism outside paradigm of totalitarianism.
To go back to your initial question, Cold war was essential because they had to do a
"both sidesism" for Soviets (a regime that could actually be described as slightly totalitarian given their definition)and Nazis (certainly not nearly as politically or socially totalizing as the other, although I think this use of totalitarianism is not actually helpful and I am
I genuinely resent both Marxian/Dem-Soc as well Nat-Soc/ fascist ideologues who twist history to bolster their ideological bs. I would be willing to bet a lot of money that no serious professional historian of fascism currently working would actually be willing to sign on to this
as a serious statement on the nature of fascism as a historical phenomenon. Fascism as a final barricade of the bourgeoise and especially more domestic or national elements of capital does correspond with how certain fascist regimes unfolded in the interwar period. However, it
certainly does not capture the full picture of these regimes nor does it prove itself to be an immutable law of history that is still applicable to the 21st century. Enzo Traverso- an excellent Italian socialist historian-who's book "Fire and Blood" published by Verso (Gravel
Historiography/suggested readings for the history of the American empire. This is not a full accounting of the history of U.S. foreign policy, but instead is a number of suggested readings that I think help us understand the nature and history of US empire.
Williams for me is the single greatest historian of US empire. Not only did Williams give a full historical accounting of the origins and trajectory of US empire, but from a theoretical standpoint he was able to help historians understand many of the underlying motivations in
each travail and moment of US foreign policy. He is characterized as a Marxist historian by some, but I don't think that captures his full view and his nuance. "The Tragedy of US Diplomacy" is the best place to start and "The Contours of American history" is his magnum opus
A quick note, this rundown of historical literature on fascism will focus on general interpretations and general histories. This will not focus on specific studies of economics, culture, or politics or regional studies. This is not a complete, and only accounts for what ive read.
My favorite historian of fascism is Stanley Payne. His "A History of Fascism" is the best overview. The second book pictured here is a taxonomic overview of fascism that focuses on ideological differences and policies in different countries.
Before I started studying German hist in grad school, My focus was on Southern hist as undergrad. Reconstruction remains my favorite body of literature because the history and controversies regarding the historiography are almost as interesting as the history itself
Pike, "the Prostrate State". One of the first journalistic accounts of reconstruction. Highly negative in its assessments of black competence in government. Many images from the film "Birth of a Nation" come straight from this book. South Carolina in particular was at the center
"La Grande Illusion", directed by Jen Renoir (1937). The shift from "Civilized" warfare in Europe to the great European civil war that was WWI. Romantically depicts the friendship between French Captain Boeldieu and German Officer von Rauffenstein.
"Reciprocal loyalty and admiration was the mirror of a dynastic and aristocratic conception of war that would not survive the trauma of 1914-1918."
"It is in accomplishing their respective military duties that Boeldieu tries to escape from his imprisonment and Rauffenstein kills
him; but at the moment of his enemy's death he asks to be pardoned: he did not wish to kill Boeldieu, simply to wound him, but it was dark and he failed. The movie shows that these enemies shared many common values - above all the sense of honour - that were certainly higher and