Incarcerated people have a substantially higher chance of surviving COVID-19 if their requests for compassionate release come before judges appointed by Obama or Clinton. Those unfortunately enough to face Trump judges are much more likely to die of COVID behind bars.
In other words, the number of deaths attributable to Trump judges is already high. (It’s going to rise exponentially over the next half-century.)
It’s great that Trump signed a criminal justice reform bill, but the tragic reality is that his judicial nominees are going to spend the rest of our lifetimes condemning incarcerated people to needless deaths.
“Don’t blame the Trump judges, change the law” OK but Congress changed the law to expand compassionate release, and it’s Trump judges who are interpreting the new rules in the stingiest, narrowest, cruelest way possible to keep rehabilitated people locked in COVID death prisons.
The First Step Act let inmates petition a judge for compassionate release when the Bureau of Prisons rejects their request. But inmates whose requests go before Trump judges are much less likely to secure compassionate release than those who go before Democratic appointees.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Joseph Stern

Mark Joseph Stern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mjs_DC

25 Jan
The Supreme Court wiped away four lower court decisions this morning because they have become moot:

•Two decisions regarding Trump's alleged violations of the foreign emoluments clause
•Two decisions regarding COVID-related restrictions on abortion

supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
•Trump is out of office, so he can no longer be violating the emoluments clause.
•The COVID-related restrictions on abortion have been lifted, so those cases no longer present live controversies.

SCOTUS deftly avoided controversy by ducking these cases until they became moot.
The Supreme Court also issued a rare decision in favor of a death row inmate, although the disposition is very complicated. Basically, SCOTUS nudged the lower courts to reconsider letting this man bring his spiritual advisor into the execution chamber. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor… Image
Read 14 tweets
23 Jan
A bunch of National Guard troops (small fraction pictured here) got the day off to go sightseeing in DC! We love to see it.
Everybody is thanking the sightseeing National Guard troops for their service 🙂
Group photo at the Lincoln!
Read 4 tweets
23 Jan
In 2012, Jeffrey Clark—the Justice Department official who hatched a plan to facilitate Trump’s coup—was CHAIR of the Federalist Society’s Environmental Law and Property Rights Practice Group. He was also involved in at least two other Federalist Society working groups.
Two current or former chairs of Federalist Society practice groups were intimately involved in Trump’s failed coup: John Eastman and, we now know, Jeffrey Clark. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Don’t worry, I’m sure the Federalist Society will take appropriate action to distance itself from coup-abettors in its ranks by (squints) continuing to invite them to speak at events
Read 5 tweets
23 Jan
Genuinely curious to hear what folks think of this take
Read 6 tweets
21 Jan
This piece by @BrandonMagner does a terrific job explaining why Biden fired Peter Robb, the NLRB GC. Robb took unprecedented steps to sabotage the agency, slash its staff, obliterate pro-union precedent, bust its own union, and grind its gears to a halt. brandonmagner.substack.com/p/should-biden…
I’m not sure it’s really registering how big a deal it is that Biden fired Robb. Progressives were worried Biden would let Robb finish out his term. And Robb refused to resign at Biden’s request! But Biden sacked him anyway. Labor leaders are hailing it as a massive victory.
If progressives were looking for a big, unmistakable sign that Biden would pursue an aggressively pro-labor agenda, they got it on Day One with the firing of Peter Robb. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
Anybody want to defend Trump Judge Justin Walker beginning this opinion with a lecture on political "factions" that includes almost an entire page of footnotes? bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop…
Background on Walker, arguably the worst (and most obnoxious) writer of Trump's judicial nominees: slate.com/news-and-polit…
There's a lot of other crazy shit in here too but for the sake of my own mental health I will simply refer you to @MaxKennerly.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!