1/ In response to some questions about release of some Capitol Hill defendants on bond pending trial, I offer this brief explainer. Detention is governed by the federal Bail Reform Act. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18…
2/ Keep in mind that pretrial, defendants are presumed innocent, and cannot be held to punish them for the crime of which they are accused. Detention is to prevent them from harming others or fleeing.
3/ Defendants get a presumption of release, and the majority are released on bond, a promise to pay a sum if they fail to return, often $10,000. Defendants are detained only if no conditions can ensure their appearance at trial or the safety of the community.
4/ At a detention hearing, the government bears the burden of proving danger to the community by clear and convincing evidence or risk of flight by a preponderance of the evidence.
5/ If the judge finds this burden is not met, she will release the defendant on bond. She may include conditions, like an ankle monitor to reduce risk of flight, or no contact with victims, to reduce risk of harm or obstruction.
6/ Conditions may also include surrendering passport, no possession of firearms, drug testing, and others, depending on the facts.
7/ Where there is some risk of flight, a judge may make the bond amount higher to provide an incentive to return. For example, I have seen judges require defendants to pledge the title to their homes as a bond.
8/ The federal system does not use cash bail, which has been criticized for penalizing the poor. In a cash bail system, a judge sets a dollar amount the defendant must pay for release, usually based on the seriousness of the crime. Inability to pay results in detention.
9/ As judges decide whether the Capitol Hill defendants should be released, they consider the nature of the offense charged, including the individual’s conduct, the weight of the evidence, criminal history and character of the offender, and danger posed.
10/ Judges are not seeking to punish defendants at this stage, but to decide whether the government has proven they are a risk of flight or pose a danger to the community between now and trial such that preventive detention is required.
11/ If convicted at trial or by guilty plea, the judge will then sentence the defendant for his crimes. The goals then are different - to punish as well as to protect public safety, deter crime, promote respect for the rule of law, and rehabilitate the defendant.
12/ The judges will decide detention in the Capitol Hill cases on a case-by-case basis, depending on all of these factors. /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Barb McQuade

Barb McQuade Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarbMcQuade

9 Sep 20
1/ DOJ intervention in defamation case is the latest abuse of the levers of government to protect Trump. Here’s how I see it. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
2/ DOJ routinely removes state tort cases to federal court where a government employee was acting in the scope of his employment when the event occurred. Think mail carrier involved in an accident in her postal truck. This law protects employees from liability on the job.
3/ Once DOJ certifies employee was acting within scope of employment, case goes to federal court. DOJ also files motion to substitute US as defendant. This means that taxpayers now pay legal fees and any money judgment. Judge may deny this motion if she disagrees about scope.
Read 9 tweets
19 Aug 20
Silver lining of COVID - live remote court hearings. Ex-FBI lawyer Clinesmith to plead guilty to altering email for Page FISA app today at 1 p.m. before Judge Boasberg in DC. I'll be listening for facts to support materiality, after DOJ has taken tortured position in Flynn case.
Judge Boasberg drew this case randomly, and also happens to sit on the FISA Court, which received the application with the altered email. He apparently did not see the need to recuse himself as a potential victim of the false statement.
Clinesmith is charged with adding the words "not a source" to an email from the CIA and giving it to a supervisory agent. Tricky fact for false statements case - the content is true. The falsity is in adding the words to make it appear that they were in the original CIA email.
Read 12 tweets
13 Aug 20
Proud to have worked with ⁦@edchungDC⁩ at @amprog and other DOJ alums on this blueprint for restoring DOJ. Top of the list: formalize limits on communications between DOJ and House. Read the full report here. americanprogress.org/issues/crimina…
Item 2 in our blueprint to restore DOJ: adopt clear, consolidated policy on election year activity. No more October surprises.
Item 3 in our blueprint for restoring DOJ: establish charging and sentencing policies free from politicization. No more Flynns and Stones.
Read 13 tweets
28 Jul 20
1/ When Barr refers to “bogus Russiagate scandal,” House should ask him to read these quotes aloud from Mueller Report:
2/ “The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion.“
3/ “... a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.”
Read 9 tweets
16 Jun 20
New police reform EO has some good steps, like improved training and limiting chokeholds, but is only a drop in the ocean. If we care about improving professionalism and supporting police, we need more extensive reforms. whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
Proposed Justice in Policing Act has broader reforms, including body and dash cameras, changes in law to improve accountability, data collection, limits on lethal force and no-knock warrants, criminalization of lynching, and more. assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6939…
Other former US Attorneys and I just posted our thoughts about the proposed bill in @USATODAY. usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
Read 6 tweets
3 Jun 20
@LindseyGrahamSC is using classic defense atty trick during @RodRosenstein testimony - pointing out absence of certain evidence to suggest that means the whole case must fall. He deliberately ignores much more evidence.
@SenFeinstein elicits answer from@@RodRosenstein that Mueller did not rely on Steele dossier whatsover in his report. She might also have included Carter Page FISA. These two items are strawmen that need to be knocked down.
@ChuckGrassley is back on the dossier. @RodRosenstein explains that the information from the dossier that made it into the FISA application was verified. And, of course, concerns about its reliability was noted to the court.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!