THREAD: The need to enable active travel is not going away. It will only become more urgent as we fail to meet climate + pollution targets.

Every major political party’s manifesto wanted more cycling infrastructure; now is the time to stop using it for hyperlocal point scoring.
What’s more, the majority of people support it. Polls show 77% think more cycling would decrease congestion. Two thirds support road space reallocation for active travel.

Regardless of politic persuasion, people are more and more concerned about the environment.
A narrative of a “war on cars” or that cycle lanes somehow cause pollution is so incredibly niche that politicians on all sides risk alienating the lion’s share of normal voters with such vitriolic language. While forgetting that most people would enjoy cycling safely. Image
People aged 60+ are most likely to own a car and use it most frequently. That makes sense, they grew up in the height of car-focused transport. But politicians are missing whole generations of people who now feel much more in tune with the environment and their local area.
This poll, as one example I found, is from the West Midlands by Liam Byrne MP on policy focuses. The environment is high up on the agenda, as is the sense of community and cleaner air in the word cloud. Image
Local politicians, of all parties, trying to form some sort of non-existent culture war risk going up against vast swathes of normal people who want to do a normal, everyday and benign activity like riding a bike - without being vilified and used as a political pawn.
This will be especially true as people start to see how the areas who have had strong political will are benefiting. People know what good looks like. People pay to go to Center Parcs to have a 15-minute city.

The more we see this is possible here, the more people will want it.
“We’re not Amsterdam” and “That couldn’t happen here” will turn into “Have you seen what they’re doing over in that town? Why aren’t we getting that investment?”

Nobody comes back from the Netherlands and says “Yeah, I had a nice time but I wish there was more traffic.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Tranter

Adam Tranter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamtranter

13 Dec 20
THREAD: A thread on research and sampling, and how the media use data and polling.

I can safely say from a decade of working with media, it is *highly* unusual for a newspaper to so heavily reference a self-selecting and homemade survey and present it as the views of all people.
Surveys with self-selecting samples, in this case, both from FairFuelUK + cycling advocates, should not be represented as the views of all of those groups; same goes for claiming data represents "Tory voters".

And that's without even mentioning the survey's leading questions.
Polls can make for really interesting stories and are commonplace in media. YouGov, a key player, vets the questions and ensures they don't lead, and gets answers from a statistically representative sample to reflect the views of all GB adults.
Read 15 tweets
15 Nov 20
Today you might read that cycle lanes will have an impact on ambulance response times, which naturally sounds concerning. But the more you look into it, the more baseless it becomes; quotes from just one individual used by media with an agenda. (Thread)

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
A new phenomenon caused by hastily rushed through COVID measures, another thing to be concerned about in 2020?

Well, no, the same spokesperson @Richardwebber99 said the same thing in 2017, also to the Mail, about separated cycle lanes then. Concerns that never materialised.
When pushed, articles had to admit that there is no data that specific cycle lanes cause delays to ambulances.

None of the articles referenced that new cycle lanes were actually being used on 999 calls to cut past congestion caused by motor vehicles.
Read 7 tweets
9 Nov 20
A thread on Play Streets - how society demonised children, briefly gave them places to play before shunning them for cars. And what might be next?

1835: Highway Act bans street games on Highway.

1860: 12-year-old George Dunn sent to prison for 5 days for playing in the street.
1912: Lord Lamington tells the Lords “Children have not many recreation grounds in London. It is only natural they play in the street.”

Between 1922-1933, over TWELVE THOUSAND children are killed by motor vehicles.

1935: By now, 2,000 children prosecuted for playing in streets
1936: Trial begins of 200 Play Streets in Manchester and Salford (they were pioneering people-friendly streets even back then).

1950s: Play streets become popular government policy, often championed by local women to retain and promote community spirit and cohesion.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!