The SBC at its worst is characterized by condemnation. This is not inconsistent with the wounded psuedo-dignity elaborately displayed when anyone attempts to hold its members accountable for their sinful behavior.
Note the waving of clean hands under the banner of scripture when a White leader in the SBC feels threatened or condemned by anyone labeled "woke" or affiliated with "CRT," the latest in a long line of bogeymen protecting members of the Fortress of Faithfulness from criticism.
SBC discipleship may accomplish very little in the way of actual transformation of its members, but one thing it does very well is using Pavlovian-style conditioning to dismiss any unease from criticism at their own behavior as a sign of someone else's sinfulness.
Is someone that you don't agree with anxious? Be sure to quote Phil 4.6-7 at them until they stop telling you about their struggles. Do you feel anxious because someone on the outside is criticizing your group? Check the following decision tree to see if you should repent:
Is the person being labeled by your leaders with any of the bad words, including but not limited to: "liberal," "woke," "Marxist," "CRT," "social gospel"? If so, their criticism is illegitimate and you don't have to listen to them anymore.
Does the person display the slightest bit of emotion surrounding their criticisms? Are they in any way angry or sad? Do they begin crying or raising their voices when you dismiss them the first 5 times? If so, they are clearly led by fragile hysterical feelings & are dismissable.
Is the person who is raising objections a woman or Black or a POC or a child? If so, they are more prone to being led away by their feelings into unbiblical deception, which is further evidence that they need to submit to the Clear-Eyed Biblical Leadership of White SBC Leaders.
Is the person challenging you about something that you did or said with Sincerity and the Best of Biblically Informed Good Intentions?
If so, they must not know that your Sweet Sincerity is the inner witness of the Holy Spirit ensuring that your good intentions will never have an impact that you did not intend or anticipate, as your actions in the world are always shaped by the Plain Meaning of Scripture.
If the person raising concerns meets any of these conditions, clutch your pearls with your clean hands over your wounded heart and remind yourself that you are being persecuted because "the darkness hates the light."
Any uncomfortable feelings of unease or "anxiety"-not the Phil 4.6-7 kind but the kind that says you are "anxious that God's Word be honored"-can now be eased as definitely not conviction of the Holy Spirit or shame that you have broken your relationships & need to repair them.
As a treat, you may now convert your anger, shame, sadness, or anxiety into Righteous Indignation and Zeal for the Gospel and God's Word and attack your critics as Unbiblical. This will feel nice and distract you from any lingering unease.
Calling someone a "Jezebel" is just a way of saying "b*tch" when you're an evangelical man that still wants to maintain a self image of being someone whose heart is pained by hearing cussing.
Calling a woman a "Jezebel" is different from a "worldly" person calling someone a "b*tch" in that it evokes the authority of scripture and the church to demonize and dismiss a woman.
Calling someone a "Jezebel" also saves the time and energy that it would take to present a charitable and nuanced description of points of affirmation about what is good about a person and points of disagreement on policy or principles.
I am also glad that Hunter Baker apologized, but won't trust people like him until they show a track record of the good fruit of repentance around the arrogant mindsets that allow evangelical men to overvalue their own calloused judgement and disdain opponents as hysterical.
I think it took some real integrity for Hunter Baker to admit the inner narrative that categorized his own approach as prudential and carefully reasoned and that of his opponents as fragile, weak, and emotional.
@pastordmack "Personal responsibility" language plays an interesting role in SBC culture and is tied to their functional model of how people come to know God and how people grow.
@pastordmack The SBC has its roots in a deeply populist model of knowledge and community. White men in the SBC often have inflated confidence in their own ability to see all of reality clearly, which is an extension of the assumption that they have access to the plain reading of scripture.
@pastordmack The role of our communities in shaping our reading of scripture is usually minimized, if not outright denied. Mutual recognition of other clear-thinking, biblically minded people then appears as recognition of other people with the Sanctified Common Sense to "see what I see."
This is what happens when church leaders lack the wisdom and depth of connection to Jesus to help people develop into Christian maturity. The sincere leaders becone exhausted doing their best to disciple people. 1/
If after years of toil in the fields of the Lord, men most men don't move beyond white, middle-class, employable, and sincere about the Bible facts, the leaders will subtly drop the standards of maturity for men to what is achievable with their current framework. 2/
This framework is unquestionable in much of white evangelical Protestantism, locking people into a system that chokes out growth because faithfulness to this system is equated with thr gospel and faithfulness to God. 3/
President Biden signed an executive action today to mandate face mask wearing on Federal property.
I've been having lots of thoughts about folks that make such performace out of refusing to wear a mask in public and how they cast themselves as Heroes of Freedom who are persecuted by the State.
It's such a toxic individualist conception of freedom, in which the sovereign autonomous individual thinks of themselves as 1. Clear-Thinking possessors of Reason, Common Sense, and Conscience who are refusing to Live in Fear and 2.