Because redistricting is coming up soon, I'd like to issue a reminder for lay people: "gerrymandering" does not mean "the districts look weird."
If you want an easy way to tell if a map is a gerrymander, overlay the map on top of a map of the state's large cities and check how often cities are arbitrarily chopped up or grouped with unrelated cities.

Both Democratic and Republican gerrymanders tend to do this.
Republican gerrymanders will group together unrelated small cities and chop up larger cities so most districts containing them are rural.

Democratic gerrymanders will group together unrelated rural areas and chop up larger rural areas so most districts containing them are urban.
(Although if you already suspect something's a gerrymander by the criteria I laid out, an easy shortcut is to just check which party controlled the legislature that drew it, assuming the legislature draws maps in that state.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Chapman

Matthew Chapman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fawfulfan

24 Jan
Hot take: general elections should be more democratic, but primaries should be less democratic.
What I mean is this: we should have a system that allows there to be way more than two parties — ranked choice voting or proportional representation — but those parties' should decide their platforms and nominations at the leadership level, with little or no input from voters.
This would ensure voters have the widest range of options possible, but it would also give political parties greater power to course-correct their leadership and agenda when the voting public rejects them.
Read 7 tweets
21 Jan
Let's be clear. Mitch McConnell doesn't just want to protect the legislative filibuster because he's in the minority. He wants to protect it because it asymmetrically blocks Democrats from passing their agenda, but not Republicans.
Think about it.

Democrats' agenda actually requires legislation. Expanding health care. Creating green jobs. Campaign finance reform. Full voting rights for all. You have to pass a bill in the Senate for all of these.
On the other hand, nothing Republicans want to do requires legislation.

Cut taxes on the rich? That can go in the budget.

Repeal regulations? Executive agencies can do that.

Roll back women's rights, voting rights, gun control? That's what judges are for.
Read 5 tweets
15 Jan
How exactly did Revali lose to Windblight Ganon?

All the other Blights had some sort of attack or defensive trait that would have made it impossible for the champion to beat them. But I don't see why Revali should have been at a disadvantage to Windblight.
Mipha couldn't beat Waterblight Ganon because she had no ranged attacks to get it on the ceiling.

Daruk couldn't beat Fireblight because he didn't have bombs to block the second phase.

Urbosa couldn't beat Thunderblight because she had no magnesis to redirect the lightning.
But Revali has no obvious weakness to be exploited by Windblight's attack pattern.

He could have dodged the wind blasts and his Great Eagle Bow should have been ideal to stun and counter from a distance.

Did Revali just... suck at using his powers?
Read 4 tweets
14 Jan
Controversial take: lower, not higher, taxes are a sign of authoritarianism.
When a country has low taxes, that tends to mean the state directly owns an industry that produces most of its revenue.

Which means the majority of the people aren't even needed to keep the state running and therefore their opinions — and rights — are irrelevant.
Governments with higher taxes, OTOH, own less of the overall economy and are therefore more dependent on their people — and their people's civic consent — to operate.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jan
I don't think Trump is the only one who could do it. However, I think that Republicans fundamentally don't understand what it was about the Trump formula that worked, so they are unlikely to replicate his appeal anytime soon.
Trump's formula is entirely about personality, not policy. He was vague and flexible on his political beliefs.

What made Trump work was, he was an angry idiot that every angry idiot in America could see themselves in.
Trump spent his life watching the same right-wing anger porn that all his fans did.

So when he spoke, yes mainly about race but also about all kinds of random uninformed conspiracy theories, millions of low-frequency voters thought, FINALLY someone who GETS what I'm mad about.
Read 6 tweets
7 Jan
Every Republican active in politics during the Trump era should be remembered based only on where they drew the line.
Did they draw the line at his openly racist immigration platform?

Did they draw the line when Trump mocked a disabled reporter?

Did they draw the line when he was sued for fraud?

Did they draw the line when he said a Hispanic judge can't be fair because of his race?
Did they draw the line when he urged his supporters to shoot Hillary Clinton?

Did they draw the line when he boasted about assaulting women?

Did they draw the line when he encouraged violence against journalists?

Did they draw the line over his ties to Russia?
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!