Some thoughts on the legality of hotel quarantine (thread)

- What will be the legal basis of hotel quarantine? I am guessing s45B(2)(b) of the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984. Seems a pretty straightforward provision... /1
... but important questions about what detail will be.
- since likely to be a deprivation of liberty in human rights law will need safeguards.
- Will it need specific authorisation each time?
- regular reviews or will 14 days be compulsory?
- access to judicial review?
- As far as I understand Norway (another European Convention on Human Rights state) did this but without legal compulsion
- Interesting Human Rights question whether detention of *potentially* infectious people falls within article 5 exception (will depend in part on necessity)
- devil will be in the detail.
- Lots of difficult decisions to make for the law, eg will certain travellers be able to make own arrangements,
- will there be exceptions eg for people with mental health issues - not surprised will take a few weeks
- also will anyone challenge their detention in court on basis it isn’t necessary eg because they have vaccine/antibodies?
- thoughts welcome in replies, thanks
- The simplest way for the govt to do this is to call it hotel quarantine but match the rules to the current self-isolation rules which allow you to leave in certain very limited circumstances, that would avoid having to have legal detention safeguards
- Also the fact that you will apparently have to pay for the pleasure of being in a quarantine hotel, I’m not sure how that would impact on legality, I imagine a court will be most interested in the detention aspects but who knows
- I don’t think any of this is necessarily unlawful. In fact, I think this is the kind of scenario which has been anticipated under human rights law for the prevention of the spread of infectious disease. But as I said, the devil will be in the detail and safeguards

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

27 Jan
Today is #HolocaustMemorialDay

I helped make this film with three survivors of genocide called The Warning Signs

We must remember and be vigilant genocide always begins with the denial of rights
Genocide doesn’t happen overnight. It comes in stages. If we ignore the denial of basic rights we risk repeating history

#HolocaustMemorialDay
Here is more on the 10 stages of genocide eachother.org.uk/ten-stages-of-…
Read 7 tweets
26 Jan
Oh dear the "spirit of the law" is back

"Our view is that Tesco's actions go against the spirit of the law"
Power to impose prohibition notice is very wide and doesn't require that the local authority has identified breaches of the law.

But the vagueness of the 'spirit of the law' may not go down well with a court looking at necessity and proportionality.

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/750/…
The 'spirit of the law' has haunted other public authorities' response to Covid enforcement recently 👻...
Read 5 tweets
22 Jan
I’m afraid to say that this behaviour may have been triggered in part by bogus advice going round the ultra orthodox Jewish community about how to get round the Covid restrictions. I have tweeted about it before
I have tried repeatedly to communicate with Rabbi Teitelbaum (whose leaflet I understand has gone to thousands of homes) as I guessed his constituents are not my followers on Twitter. I achieved some success in a leaflet being amended but not enough sadly
Read 8 tweets
21 Jan
The fixed penalty notices are for more than 15 not ‘15+’🤦🏼‍♂️

And it’s not just for house parties, for any gathering over 15 (not 15+!) people 🤦🏼‍♂️
It has been pointed out to me, fairly, that there is another possible interpretation that if you attend with 15+ people (so there are 16+ people) you fall within the new rule. But the wording is ambiguous as it could be the *party* which has 15+
Read 4 tweets
21 Jan
🚨Fixed Penalty Notices for indoor gatherings of over 15 people to be increased to £800 for attendance.

- Currently Fixed Penalty Notices for attending gatherings in breach of rules is maximum £200 (or £100 if you pay within 14 days)
This is wrong in BBC announcement - @ChrisMasonBBC

Current Fixed Penalty Notice for someone who "holds or is involved in the holding" of a gathering over over 30 people (not 15) is £10,000

See legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1374…
As I have pointed out a few times, the £10,000 Fixed Penalty Notice 'mega fine' has always been a strange aspect of the regulations enforcement regime.

Read 9 tweets
19 Jan
Tonight's talk - not open access but will try to post a link to recording if I can
I'm told there will be a recording on YouTube
Have just been through my pinned Twitter thread to start putting together a basic timeline of the England lockdown. To be developed!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!