"Insurance can only work in Mediocristan; you should never write an uncapped insurance contract if there is risk of catastrophe. The point is called the catastrophe principle."
"{thick tailed}, extreme events away from the centre of the distribution play a very large role. Black Swans are not "more frequent", they are more consequential. The fattest tail distribution has just one very large extreme deviation, rather than many departures from the norm"
"As tails fatten, to mimic what happens in financial markets for example, the probability of a single event staying within one standard deviation rises... we get higher peaks, smaller shoulders, and a higher incidence of a very large deviation"
Beta, Sharpe Ratio and other common hackneyed financial metrics are uninformative
"When variance is infinite, R^2 should be 0. But because samples are necessarily finite, it will show, deceivingly, higher numbers than 0. Effectively, under thick tails R^2 is useless, uninformative, and often downright fraudulent"
"What is called evidence based science, unless rigorously disconfirmatory, is usually interpolative, evidence-free, and unscientific"
"Stating 'violence has dropped' because the number of people killed in wars has declined from the previous year or decade is not a scientific statement"
We need more (way more) data
Robust/Fragile/Antifragile
"Is robust what does not produce variability across perturbation of parameters of the probability distribution. If there is change, but with an asymmetry, concave or convex response to such perturbation, the classification is fragility/antifragility"
Naive Empiricism: never compare thick tailed variables to thin tailed ones.
"The rationality of of common people with a good tail risk detector, compared to the ignorance of experts. People are more calibrated to consequences and properties of distributions than psychologists claim."
"If we visibly incur tiny risk of ruin, but have a frequent exposure, it will go to probability one over time."
"This attitude to tail risk can explain that $GS is 149 years old - and it ran as a partnership with unlimited liability for 130 years, but was bailed out once on 2009, after it became a bank"
"The tail exponent is rather hard to guess, and it's calculation marred with errors, owning to the insufficiency of data in the tails. In general, the data will show thinner tail than it should"
March 2020 Jobless Claims
"The jump is a surprise... but only to economists"
"Bonds don't just default "a little bit". Note the divergence, the probability of the realization being at or close to the mean is about nil."
"what can break and is irreversible will eventually break"
Pandemics = The fattest tails
Fuhgetaboutit
"Just like the FAA and the FDA who deal with safety by focusing on catastrophe avoidance, we will through away the ordinary under the rug and retain extreme as the sole sound approach to risk management"
"Being a "good forecaster" in binary space doesn't lead to having good performance"
"Under fat tails there is no "typical" disaster or collapse... Verbal binary predictions or beliefs cannot be used as guages... Binary bets can never represent *skin in the game* under fat tailed distributions"
Why you know nothing about wealth inequality
"we can easily get a historical illusion of rise, in let's say, wealth concentration"
"Violence is much more severe than it seems from conventional analyses and the prevailing "long peace" theory... The risk of violent conflict has not been decreasing, but rather is underestimated... "
Why there is an equity risk premium
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nobody wants to say it out loud because the Stripe mafia, but the primary reason for lower employee costs at Adyen vs Stripe is because the people running Stripe run it with VC dollars and owners run Adyen.
Does that explain all the differences? No of course not but it is absolutely one of the most important aspects of the company. Watching Stripe hire and fire during the bubble vs Adyen patiently waiting is absolutely core to employee cost differential.
Lastly bottoms up disruption mental model doesn't apply in payments. You're never going to sign up enough SMBs to get scale, you sign up ecom aggregators like Shopify, substack, Etsy, eBay etc... and what does that sale smotion look like? Exact same as enterprise? Would love to know why you think this is wrong @benthompson
TikTok ban is great example of LT vs. St thinking. ST traders would likely buy but in no way is it a LT positive for $META.
Banning TT will only modestly increase reels consumption over maybe a year or two. Why modestly? Because it only modestly (if any?) decreased consumption thus far.
What actually matters is TT ushered in SFV. SFV kneecaped Facebook. TT proved the bears right. Social graph value went to zero as the AI algo took over. LT TT ban doesn't change the fact that SFV is a no moat capital intensive biz which will see multiple new entrants.
Pretty wild how political Naval, someone who claims to be peaceful and open minded is. One of the smartest people I've ever learned from, whose brain utterly destroyed by politics. It truly is hard to be the person he pretends to be, even he can't do it!
Naval the Nutcase.
"Impossible to understand macro economics" - Naval
Yet here I have five sentences explaining the current inflation paradigm that's absolutely incorrect and based on my political leanings rather than logic or without the nuance of complexity.
"Interpreting ratings as a due diligence mechanism is intuitive but anachronistic... Ratings serve to mitigate information asymmetries between institutional investors, clients, and regulators through independent risk estimates" $SPGI $MCO h/t @rhunterh
"When ratings drastically change, market actors are forced to make hasty changes to their portfolios to adhere to the stipulations of the contracts and regulations that bind them."
"any competitor able to offer more reliably accurate indicators of credit risk should have the potential to supplant the Big Three. But reliably accurate indicators of credit risk are a mirage... it is not possible to accurately account for all possible contingencies"