What does today's news of the "beginning of the end" of badger culling mean, in terms of badgers still to be killed? I had a go at estimating the likely trajectories. A thread... 1/9
Defra is consulting on an intention to issue no new culling licences after 2022, and to limit new supplementary culling licences to 2 years consult.defra.gov.uk/bovine-tb-2020… 2/9
This doesn't mean no culling after 2022, it means no *new licences* after 2022. To project what this may mean for the next few years, I first calculated the average size of existing cull areas (510 sq km), and numbers killed per sq km in each year of culling 3/9 Image
Then, based on previous years, I assumed that NE would issue 10 new licences for average-sized cull areas in 2021, and 10 more in 2022. This leads to a peak of over 40,000 badgers killed in 2022, dropping to zero in 2026 4/9 Image
The total over the lifetime of the licensed culling policy would be 276,045 dead badgers, of which 126,783 (46%) would be killed after today's signalling of the end of culling. 5/9
But! Defra is also consulting on the possibility of halting new culls after two years. This leads to the same peak but reduces the numbers killed a bit more rapidly 6/9 Image
The total over the lifetime of the licensed cull policy would then be 256,879, of which 42% would die after today's announcement. The effect is small because most badgers are killed in the first two years of a cull. 7/9
These calculations assume that a full complement of 10 cull zones would be recruited for each of the two years that licences are available, which is not guaranteed. Obviously, fewer licences and smaller numbers reduce the overall total. 8/9
To summarise: today's consultation concerns not so much the end of culling, or even really the beginning of the end, but (to quote Churchill) the end of the beginning. 2025 should see the last culls and by then vaccination should be extensive. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rosie Woodroffe

Rosie Woodroffe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RosieWoodroffe

27 Jan
This new announcement consult.defra.gov.uk/bovine-tb-2020… means two more years of new #badgercull licences. In 2019-20 new licences covered an area larger than Cornwall, Devon, and Dorset combined so a lot more badgers could die before culling ends
It also looks as though 2025 would be the last year of large-scale culling. The last new licences would be issued in 2022, so 4 years of culling would run 2022-5 (though culling could be stopped earlier)
The supplementary cull licences issued in 2020 would the last 5-year licences issued (culling 2020-4).
Read 15 tweets
7 Nov 19
So many questions about this story, starting with: What measures does @NaturalEngland have in place to check that badgers submitted during culls come from the cull zones, from cull periods? cornwalllive.com/news/cornwall-…
The risk of shooters "beefing up" the numbers by submitting road kills, or adding in badgers shot elsewhere, has been known since the first pilot culls, when badgers subject to PM included 1 that was never shot, and 1 that was shot when already dead assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
...and when @FredaBrox reported tracking a marksman's vehicle which repeatedly visited a baited sett miles from the cull zone. Maybe not legal but a clue to @NaturalEngland what might be going on.
Read 12 tweets
21 Oct 19
Today I published a paper - not headline-grabbing or especially policy-relevant - but I'm proud of it because it solves a problem I've wanted to understand for years: how African wild dog populations work
Wild dogs are highly social. So social it was thought that small packs could not survive. Hence any threat which reduced pack size could cause population extinction.
In particular, it was assumed that small packs would produce small dispersal groups (if any) forming more small packs - so there would be an extinction vortex driven in part by the animals' own social behaviour
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!