The @nytimes ed board just wrote the dumbest shit I have ever seen committed to text. You want to know why elite institutions are utterly failing in the face of a white nationalist insurgence? Look no further. Every braindead DC dysfunction, right here. nytimes.com/2021/01/27/opi…
This is the worst part. After saying Biden shouldn't take the actual actions he CAN take, it says he is entirely responsible for "hammering out agreements with Congress." And if he fails, it's his fault. And his legacy.
I literally can not think of a more perfectly crafted way to set Biden up for failure. You couldn't do it better if you had malicious intent.
When Democrats win, they are judged not by whether they can improve people's lives, but by whether they can persuade Republicans to be less insane. It's utterly surreal & ludicrous, but it's been a habit of elite thinking for so long that they don't even notice it any more.
"Mr. President, it's been four years now, and Mitch McConnell is still an asshole. Why should voters trust you for a second term?"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Congratulations to @MontgomeryCoMD, where a NIMBY-ridden county council threw up so many barriers & restrictions that renewable-energy developer Chaberton Energy has given up entirely & is withdrawing -- no solar fields, no jobs, no energy. theseventhstate.com/?p=14662&fbcli…
Chaberton president @StefanoRatti wrote to the council:
This is a good paper/thread, but there's something slightly odd about study after study discovering that the world's pathetically low carbon prices are producing pathetically little effect. That's not really the locus of disagreement, is it?
The policy-relevant dispute is not whether low carbon prices will magically have large effects (they won't), but a) whether higher carbon prices are politically possible, and b) whether higher carbon prices are worth the political effort relative to other carbon policies.
Evidence to date suggests that, when it comes to direct pricing of carbon, it requires enormous political effort to achieve even a modest price (which has modest effects). The question is whether commensurate political effort directed at other policies can produce more impact.
This episode of @yourewrongabout is typically good, but what most fascinated/horrified me, what I can't stop thinking about, is the description of the Citadel itself. It's a "military college" in South Carolina -- with no actual ties to the military. podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6L…
Meaning, in other words, it's a military *cosplay* college. Does it teach military skills & discipline? No. It appears to exist purely to replicate the Southern "honor culture" -- an authoritarian culture based on dominance & toxic masculinity.
This was especially true back in the 70s/80s, before some mild reforms were forced on it. There was a scandal a while back when it was revealed that freshmen were beaten & humiliated, often sexually, as part of "hazing."
My kid is forcing us to watch football, which means watching live TV, which means watching ads. I almost never see ads any more, so I haven't been desensitized, and holy crap are they just awful.
I think the reason I hate TV ads so much is that the industry has the biggest, most sophisticated audience-research apparatus in the world. Every character & trope in every ad = what worked in audience testing & focus groups. It all reflects what appeals to Americans, which ...
... is not great, given the ads. The example that keeps jumping out at me: America apparently really loves non-threatening black women dressed like bougie suburbanites, with "fun" bouncy hair (but never an afro or anything too, y'know, black).
Look at this bullshit. ABC brought this loathsome turd on to repeat his lies. Then, because the host makes futile after-the-fact efforts to push back, he ALSO gets to pretend he's the victim of "liberal bias." All 100% foreseeable.
Politico interviewed a bunch of people who knew Josh Hawley in college and they all basically say the same thing: I knew that guy, he was smart & conscientious, I respected him, and I truly, truly can't believe what an asshole he's become. .politico.com/news/magazine/…
It really could not be more clear that Hawley is a smart, self-aware guy who has consciously decided the best way to become president is to become the champion of America's white nationalist movement. Even with Cruz I think there's some self-bullshitting, but Hawley 100% knows.
And, because I am me, a dismal prediction: all the shit Hawley is currently taking -- being cut off by donors & corporations, his colleagues scolding him, that picture of him saluting insurrectionists circulating everywhere -- is going to help him in the long run.