Hasu Profile picture
28 Jan, 8 tweets, 2 min read
Some money quotes in Dalio's note on Bitcoin

"It seems to me that Bitcoin has succeeded in crossing the line from being a highly speculative idea that could well not be around in short order to probably being around and probably having some value in the future." (p1)
Dalio challenges the idea that Bitcoin is as scarce as people think, since there is an unlimited number of "Bitcoin-like assets". More innovative coins can probably carve out their own demand, and arguably we are already seeing that today. (p1)
Though Dalio knows about the ability to hold coins in cold storage, he's still concerned about the ability to shield them against cyber attacks and hold them securely. He warns that increasing digitization also increases systemic risk. (p2)
Dalio thinks that Bitcoin's achilles heel is its lack of privacy. While very experienced users can use it privately, most people can't, and that would make it easy for governments to prevent wide-spread adoption as money. (I fully agree.) (p2)
By the way, Dalio with the shot against S2F type models: "Since the supply is known, one has to estimate the demand to estimate its price."
To end, here are the two money quotes:

"[...] Bitcoin looks like a long-duration option on a highly unknown future that I could put an amount of money in that I wouldn’t mind losing about 80% of."
"[we] expect Bridgewater to soon offer an alt-cash fund and a storehold of wealth fund in order to better deal with the devaluation of money and credit that we consider to be a major risk and opportunity, and Bitcoin won’t escape our scrutiny." - Dalio
Full report out now bridgewater.com/research-and-i…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hasu

Hasu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hasufl

30 Jan
It is absolutely mental how many famous Bitcoin evangelists reject coordination problems as a concept. Why? If they admitted that coordination problems exist, they'd also validate their possible solutions, e.g. a central government, or above that, an international order.
However, that thinking is incredibly short-sighted. It's possible to admit that coordination problems exist AND that we need better solutions than central parties. Bitcoin itself is such a solution. But that opens another can of worms...
If they admitted that a rule-based system, enforced by cryptography and economic incentives, are a useful to solution to anything else than digital gold, they'd risk also validating Defi and at least a few other altcoins... oops
Read 4 tweets
19 Jan
Most people in crypto are used to thinking about inflation as a purely social or monetary design choice. But a cryptocurrency's inflation rate is also a lever to shift the volatility of demand between having a predictable cost for users OR a predictable level of security. Image
In the future, inflation in Bitcoin will go to zero, and miners are paid only with transaction fees. Since demand is uncertain, the size of the miner reward (and hence network security) is unpredictable.
In Ethereum, validators are paid primarily with inflation, establishing a predictable floor for security. Inflation can be offset by deflation from burning transaction fees. But demand to transact is once again uncertain, making the total inflation rate is unpredictable.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jan
Fixed supply of shares is a really dumb concept for pseudo-equity. Projects need to be able to mint more shares if they want to invest in growth, as well as buy back shares if they think they are underpriced.
That said, it's not necessarily the right thing to do for Yearn. As I've said many times before, my biggest problem with the project (and reason I sold) is that I don't see enough urgency to build vaults and strategies that users actually want.
Diluting existing equity holders would likely exacerbate the problem as it makes generating cashflows even less urgent.
Read 5 tweets
14 Jan
Whitelisted protocols can now borrow from Cream without posting collateral. I have a few thoughts/questions on it

1) pool to protocol loans are a natural first step for uncollateralized loans when the borrowing protocol is itself non-custodial
2) Lots of people were speculating what it means for two protocols (such as Yearn X Cream) to "merge"/partner with each other. This is an unexpected advantage as Yearn vaults will be able to borrow for free.
3) Being whitelisted is a big advantage so maybe to qualify and align incentives future candidates will have to hold CREAM tokens in their treasury.
Read 8 tweets
1 Dec 20
This is gonna be my last comment on ETH2 staking. Since many ppl have attacked me after projecting a position that I never actually argued for (incl. some nasty PMs - tyvm) I will clarify what I do and don't think:
1) I *don't* think locking ETH in the deposit contract necessarily constitutes a sale. I won‘t be shocked if the IRS argues that it does. But I sure as hell would first try to convince them of the opposite
2) There will be two versions of ETH on most exchanges (ETH + stakedETH, ETH2, beaconETH, whatever you want to call it). There will be many versions of ETH in the market as a whole.

3) If you receive such a liquid staking token, that is most likely a tax event.

And that's it.
Read 4 tweets
30 Nov 20
Here we go. Coinbase doing exactly what I predicted:
* Users can mint BETH by staking ETH via Coinbase
* they can trade BETH against ETH and other coins on Coinbase
* get staking rewards AND liquidity at the same time

This is very attractive. Other exchanges will follow.
Hope this also buries the "there won't be two assets, only ETH" narrative that was popular for a short while
spent a few minutes thinking through the tax implications of staking on Coinbase.

here's a few things we know with ~reasonable certainty. cc @TokenTax

1) going ETH -> BETH is a taxable event
2) you don't own a token until you claimed it

(cont)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!