Last year, just before the pandemic hit, I gave the @clarehall_cam Tanner Lectures on Human Values, reflecting on how tech has empowered humanity -- and yet it rightly feels like we have less and less control. today.law.harvard.edu/gaining-power-…
That added power, for example, doesn't just make autonomous vehicles work without drivers. It means those cars can answer to, say, law enforcement authorities instead of the passengers -- locking the doors and driving them to the nearest police station if a warrant is issued.
Our 25 years of a mainstreamed Internet has seen three eras of (non)governance. The first is "rights" -- focusing on how to enjoy the new freedoms of communication without interference from governments who would surveill it and big interests (e.g., ©) who are harmed by it.
The Rights Era, focused on defense against interference, is then eclipsed by the Public Health Era. Here the worry is about broad, systemic harms from unmediated communication - abuse, harassment, disinformation - and the indifference by platforms who could do something about it.
There's no easy way to reconcile rights and public health frameworks. Both state real problems. Solutions often can't be reconciled. But having a few social media founders with permanent unilateral decisionmaking over them is a universally bad (non)answer. theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
What's emerging is an approach to give these decisions the weight and attention they deserve, perhaps from external decisionmakers who don't have the corporate executives' day-to-day incentives and pressures. Like the FB @oversightboard, today releasing its first decisions.
This new era of more formal external process, to try to achieve legitimacy, is at just the time that digital intermediaries, in part thanks to AI, really can and do monitor and intervene in the flow of information, for better or worse. Abdication is now a choice, not a necessity.
Anyway, here's the link to the full lecture. Its references to "public health" were both figurative and literal -- though before the pandemic. All the more in play now.

Curious what you think.
For those who are allergic to slides or otherwise like podcasts, here's the podcastified version of the Tanner lecture, with thanks to @lydia_rosenberg podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/tan…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Zittrain

Jonathan Zittrain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zittrain

19 Nov 20
This story has a strong lede and discussion about how unprecedented, and ill-grounded (indeed, groundless), the Trump campaign's efforts are to overturn voters' decisions in Michigan and elsewhere. But it slips a bit into casual horserace mode over attempted election-stealing. --
If reporters covered assassinations the way they're talking about current events: "Some in the campaign have floated plans to physically attack the winning candidate. However, most agree their clumsiness and existing police protection renders that approach a mere fever dream."
If reporters covered assassinations the way they're talking about current events: “Some in the campaign have floated plans to physically attack the winning candidate. However, experts believe this approach has little chance of success.”
Read 5 tweets
18 Nov 20
I think there's a key barrier to uphold, where players of hardball feel like they must deny it's a mere exercise of power they can get away with, and say instead that circumstances/principles compel them to their actions. Because then any hypocrisy will slow them down. ...
We saw this in the refusal to hold a hearing for Garland; it was couched as a rule about election-year Court vacancies rather than as "we won't seat him because we're Team R and you're Team D, and we have the votes." Seating ACB became: we have the votes. ...
And they did! At that point it opens the door to approval of future nominations being only when the same party holds the Senate. The shift from reasons (however pretextual) to raw power is even worse for elections. ...
Read 5 tweets
29 May 20
Lots going on here: Twitter labels this tweet for violating Twitter’s rules about glorifying violence; the tweet stays up because of its “public importance” test; Twitter further disables retweeting without comment so it can’t go viral so easily. RT with comment is OK. Screenshot of Twitter’s mod...
Then, the official White House account has repeated the words Donald Trump said as realdonaldtrump - “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” - perhaps to associate the full force of the office of the Presidency with them. I imagine Twitter rules will apply again.
Twitter has surely waded into a fraught zone. Good. One of the ways to try to break what is mad online behavior of even a (especially a?) President is to create rules to deal with it - rules that would have no place in normal circumstances. Then endure and respond to blowback.
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct 19
A+ analysis of debate over responsible disclosure of AI advances by @RebeccaCrootof.

What’s riskier for tech that could cause great harm: democratization where nearly anyone can abuse it, or hoarding by a handful of big companies/gov’ts?
For nuclear weapons, non-proliferation seems the strategy. (Though the non-proliferation is of physical materials like enriched uranium, rather than knowledge of how to build a bomb, which has ultimately proven hard to contain.)
Internet access is on the other end of the spectrum of desirable diffusion. “Internet for all” is the worthy, non-controversial rallying cry of the @internetsociety, even as particular apps, including social media, are increasingly scrutinized over what wrongs they empower.
Read 10 tweets
18 Jul 19
This is a compelling account of data leakage through dodgy but popular browser extensions. To do a small useful task -- like letting you easily zoom in a picture on a web page -- an extension will ask for full permissions to read and modify everything you see as you surf. ...
... Thousands of extensions ask for and get that access from users who have no reason to know that, say, the URLs they click on will be shared for "marketing" purposes, eventually finding their way to brokers like Nacho Analytics, who then sell the data to anyone who pays ...
It turns out a lot of private data ends up in a URL. Long, un-guessable URLs are ways of referring to private Google Drive or OneDrive docs. They contain record locators and passenger names for airline flights. And those extensions read it all and pass it along.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!