2/ Just finished a "blow out" year for PC sales, at 275 million. Sounds huge from a growth perspective, but that still doesn't approach estimates of 450 million or more from a decade ago.
3/ The underlying shift that started in 2010--towards low power, high reliability, "sealed case", app store, connected to phones, WWAN, and more computers epitomized by the iPad -- remains in full swing.
4/ A way to contextualize this is to look at iPads relative to laptops. About 200M PCs were laptops, IF chromebooks are included. Estimates are that Chromebooks are about 30M units. computerworld.com/article/360462…
5/ You can see this if you compare Gartner to IDC PC sales. For mysterious reasons IDC includes Chromebooks in PCs but not Surface Pro like devices. Gartner doesn't include Chromebooks (and reflects traditional desktop OS PCs).
6/ Generally, a rule of thumb is that half of PCs are from business buyers. So about 100M laptops are bought by businesses. It also means almost half that number are alternatives to laptops. Half. Half of all laptops WW. That's a lot.
7/ The arguments over whether the iPad (or Chromebook) are a "substitute" or "adjacenct" to a laptop no longer matter at this volume. There's an inevitable march towards the new architecture for portable computing.
8/ It doesn't change that there are 200-300M people who *must* use a traditional x86 laptop/desktop for work for compatibility, their professional software package, or just their view of "productivity". Heck I'm even using a Surface right now.
9/ The most interesting question is where do you count the M1 Macintosh? :-)
What an incredible shift in the "personal computer" platform this turned out to be.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ Hardcore Software is my first-person account of Microsoft events from pre-Windows 3 through the rise of Office, building a new Windows, and disruption. Along the way came the internet, pivot to enterprise, antitrust trial, product quality crises, reorgs, Apple, …much more.
3/ My substack is a serialization of a book, or two, I wrote. I realized in working with a traditional publisher that I could tell a much better story for many more people by using Substack. So that’s what I chose to do. Here’s why:
Today is the 13th anniversary iPhone announcement—easily one of the greatest launch events and moments of technology change in history. What was the "world" like at the time? When something changes the world so much it seems obvious in hindsight. That was not at all the case. 1/
2/ First, Apple itself was on a bit of a rebound with the iPod and iMac. But that only made Apple part of culture and healthy, but still a fringe player in computing. In all 2006 Apple sold about 5M Macs, which was strong for them but not compared to 235M PCs (98%share).
3/ Apple in the midst of the "Get a Mac" advertising campaign. That’s the "I’m a Mac" and "I’m a PC". These ads were brilliantly executed and brutal relative to Microsoft. These really hit where it hurt the most. So much we had endless fights over if they were true. They were.
Here's an interesting (to me) graph. The grey line are unit sales of all "personal computers" starting in 1981 (IBM PC, Apple, Tandy, Sinclair, and more). 1981=35,000 units WW.
What is the related sold blue line that is a much nicer exponential curve?
The solid blue are internet hosts. People have a lot of difficulty understanding exponential growth. Few understood the implications of "every desktop and every home".
And even many of those people didn't understand "...connected to the internet."
3/ A few have asked about what I counted. Prior to NAT (home internet addresses like 192.168...) every computer connected to the "internet" over tcp/IP had an address that had to be allocated and maintained. That was easy to measure. Here is the source. tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1296
A Chinese Covid-19 Vaccine Has Proved Effective, Its Maker Says nytimes.com/2020/12/30/bus… // This vaccine made w/a traditional time-proven technique and deployed in several places. Might sound less effective than headlines but subject selection likely different than US. 1/3
2/3 for example... Arab nations first to approve Chinese COVID vaccine — despite lack of public data nature.com/articles/d4158…
3/ Two Companies Say Their Vaccines Are 95% Effective. What Does That Mean? // This older story explains efficacy v effectiveness and what that 95% number means in practice. nytimes.com/2020/11/20/hea…
2/ Generally I hate the idea of smart switches because using the app is annoying and I am not a fan of elaborate macros and the like. Plus adding a hub is problematic for many reasons. Light switches are a legacy interface that is reliable :-)
3/ These switches require no hub and connect directly to WiFi. When attached to a single light you want to control remotely they “just work”. App control and schedule.
Only wish — the app should have a randomized time on/off to simulate the value prop of “pretend you’re home”.
1/ This is quite a significant development. Some will say “finally”. Some might say this is wrapped up in politics. For me, journey to this conclusion is kind of a big deal. A look back…
2/ When the first cases hit, public statements from NIH/CDC were solidly about transmission via p2p contact, consistent with cold and flu. Of course there was the famous Fauci comment on handshakes - that was as late as April. npr.org/2020/04/16/836…
3/ Going back before then, however, there were early papers out of China. But these were viewed as anecdotal PLUS many thought information from China was “suspect” at the very least they were not peer reviewed.